Evaluation of the Performance and Safety of a Single-dose Hyaluronic Acid (Promovia Hydro Balance) in the Treatment of Non-traumatic Degenerative Meniscus Tears

April 13, 2026 updated by: Innate srl
Evaluation of the performance and safety of a single-dose hyaluronic acid (Promovia hydro balance) in the treatment of non-traumatic degenerative meniscus tears

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of a single-dose intra-articular hyaluronic acid treatment (Promovia Hydro Balance 100 mg/4 mL; Innate S.r.l, Novi Ligure (AL), Italy) in restoring joint function and reducing associated pain. The safety of the treatment will also be assessed.

Primary objective: To evaluate, using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the performance of intra-articular treatment with Promovia Hydro Balance at a 6-month follow-up (T6) in restoring joint function and improving associated pain in patients with non-traumatic degenerative meniscal tears.

Secondary objectives: To evaluate the performance of Promovia Hydro Balance in terms of improvement in overall pain, joint stiffness, and patient quality of life at 3 (T3) and 6 months (T6) following the injection. The safety of the treatment and the consumption of analgesics/NSAIDs will also be evaluated in the various phases of the study at the various follow-up times.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

25

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • MI
      • Milan, MI, Italy
        • Recruiting
        • ASST Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • - Age between 35 and 75 years at the time of administration.
  • Presence of a symptomatic degenerative meniscus tear, not related to acute trauma, documented by MRI.
  • Positive meniscal tests.
  • Pain intensity NRS ≥ 4.
  • Willingness to participate in physical therapy or light exercise.
  • Informed consent received, understood, and signed by the patient for active participation in the study and for the processing of personal data.
  • Ability of the patient to understand the study conditions and to participate for the entire duration of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - Patients with traumatic meniscus tears.
  • Patients with a meniscal tear requiring surgical treatment (FLAP tear, radial tear, RAMP tear).
  • Patients with severe knee osteoarthritis.
  • Patients with axial deviation greater than 10°.
  • Patients who have undergone meniscal or ligament surgery in the previous 12 months.
  • Patients with rheumatic diseases or chondrocalcinosis.
  • Patients with signs of possible infection in the affected joint or a skin disease involving the knee (e.g., dermatitis, psoriasis).
  • Patients with diabetes.
  • Patients with coagulopathies, platelet aggregation disorders, or those receiving oral anticoagulants or antiplatelet drugs.
  • Patients receiving intra-articular corticosteroids or hyaluronic acid in the previous 12 months.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patients.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patients with non-traumatic degenerative meniscus lesions
Promovia Hydro Balance 100 mg

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evalution T6 with Koos (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score): efficacy
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in the evaluation at 6 Months
To evaluate, through the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) functional score, the performance of intra-articular treatment with Promovia Hydro Balance at 6 months follow-up (T6) in the recovery of joint function and improvement of associated pain in patients affected by non-traumatic degenerative meniscus lesions
Change from Baseline in the evaluation at 6 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Performance evaluation T3 with Koos Questionnaire
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in the evaluation at 3 Months

Evaluate the performance of Promovia Hydro Balance in terms of improvement of general pain, joint stiffness and patient quality of life 3 (T3) after infiltration treatment.

T3 evaluation with Koos questionnaire

Change from Baseline in the evaluation at 3 Months
Evaluation of performance T3 with Womac (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in the evaluation at 3 Months
Secondary endpoints will consist of evaluating the performance of Promovia Hydro Balance in terms of improvement in overall pain, joint stiffness and patient quality of life at 3 months. Evaluation with Womac scale (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index)
Change from Baseline in the evaluation at 3 Months
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at T3 compared to baseline
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in NRS at 3 month from T0
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at T3 compared to baseline (T0). econdary endpoints will consist of evaluating the performance of Promovia Hydro Balance in terms of improvement in overall pain, joint stiffness and patient quality of life
Change from Baseline in NRS at 3 month from T0
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at 6 months
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in NRS at 6 months from T0
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at 6 months compared to baseline. Secondary endpoints will consist of evaluating the performance of Promovia Hydro Balance in terms of improvement in overall pain, joint stiffness and patient quality of life
Change from Baseline in NRS at 6 months from T0
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) at 6 months
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at time of 6 months.
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) at 6 months compared to baseline (T0). Secondary endpoints will consist of evaluating the performance of Promovia Hydro Balance in terms of improvement in overall pain, joint stiffness and patient quality of life
Change from Baseline at time of 6 months.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AE and SAE
Time Frame: Presence of adverse events and serious adverse events at 3 months from T0
Presence of adverse events and serious adverse events at 3 months from T0
Presence of adverse events and serious adverse events at 3 months from T0
AE and SAE
Time Frame: Presence of adverse events and serious adverse events at 6 months from T0
Presence of adverse events and serious adverse events at 6 months from T0
Presence of adverse events and serious adverse events at 6 months from T0
consumption of analgesic/fans
Time Frame: consumption of analgesic/fans at 3 months from T0
consumption of analgesic/fans at 3 months from T0
consumption of analgesic/fans at 3 months from T0
consumption of analgesic/fans
Time Frame: consumption of analgesic/fans at 6 months from T0
consumption of analgesic/fans at 6 months from T0
consumption of analgesic/fans at 6 months from T0

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 30, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 13, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Meniscus Tears

Clinical Trials on Promovia Hydro Balance 100 mg, Hyaluronic acid sodium salt and trehalose

Subscribe