Hyaluronan in the Treatment of Painful Achilles Tendinopathy.

November 6, 2015 updated by: TRB Chemedica AG
The primary objective of this study is to compare OSTENIL® TENDON (2% hyaluronan) and Extracorporeal Shock Wave (ESWT) therapy in the treatment of painful Achilles tendinopathy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

62

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Edegem, Belgium, 2650
        • Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen, Fysische Geneeskunde en Revalidatie
    • Nordrhein-Westfalen
      • Aachen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany, 52062
        • Praxiszentrum Orthopädie-Unfallchirurgie Nordrhein

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female patients between 18 and 75 years of age.
  • Good general health condition.
  • Signed written informed consent.
  • Painful Achilles midportion tendinopathy since more or equal than 6 weeks.
  • Pain according to VAS (Huskisson, 100 mm) more or equal than 40 mm.
  • Ensured compliance of subjects over the whole study period.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concomitant or previous participation in a clinical investigation within the last 3 months prior to study inclusion.
  • Infection or relevant skin disease at study relevant site.
  • Blood coagulation disorder or intake of blood thinner (e.g. Marcumar).
  • Known hypersensitivity to hyaluronic acid (HA) preparations or to the constituents mannitol, sodium chloride, disodium phosphate and sodium dihydrogenphosphate.
  • Contra-indications for ESWT application in study relevant area (e.g. recent surgery, malignant tumour, local osteomyelitis or open epiphysis).
  • Severe intercurrent illness (e.g. uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, peripheral neuropathy), which in the opinion of the investigator, may put the patient at risk when participating in the study, or affect the patient's ability to take part in the study.
  • Concomitant disease at study relevant site (e.g. insertion tendinopathy at Achilles tendon) influencing study evaluation.
  • Diseases or characteristics judged by the investigator to be incompatible with the assessments and/or procedures for the study evaluation.
  • Intake of concomitant medications not allowed which might interfere with the functional assessment of the study (e.g. immunosuppressive drugs within the last 3 months).
  • Previous therapies (except non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID)) at study relevant site within the last 4 weeks prior to study inclusion.
  • Use of NSAIDs within the last week prior to study treatment.
  • Recent history of drug and/or alcohol abuse (within the last 6 months).
  • Pregnant or lactating females.
  • Participants of childbearing age (pre-menopausal) who do not accept the use of methods of birth control with pearl index of at least 1 (i.e. oral contraceptives, vaginal ring, hormone-releasing Intrauterine Device (IUD), implants, depot syringes, hormone patch, double barrier method, tubal ligation, vasectomised partner,…) during the treatment period and the first 4 weeks of follow-up period.
  • Subjects not capable of contracting and of understanding the nature, risks, significance and implications of the clinical investigation and unable to form a rational intention in the light of these facts.
  • Subjects unable to understand informed consent or having a high probability of non compliance to the study procedures and / or non completion of the study according to investigator's judgement (e.g. illiteracy, insufficient knowledge of local language).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: ESWT (Extracorporal Shock Wave Therapy)
Three applications in weekly interval.
Active Comparator: hyaluronic acid sodium salt
Two injections of 2% (40 milligrams (mg) / 2 millilitres (ml)) hyaluronan in weekly interval.
Other Names:
  • OSTENIL® TENDON

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A score)
Time Frame: Day 90 (plus or minus 3 days)
The validated questionnaire will be used to evaluate the outcome in Achilles tendinopathy. The score ranges from '0' to '100' whereas '0' denotes 'no activity / maximum pain' and '100' denote 'maximum activity / no pain'.
Day 90 (plus or minus 3 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A score)
Time Frame: Day 0
The validated questionnaire will be used to evaluate the outcome in Achilles tendinopathy. The score ranges from '0' to '100' whereas '0' denotes 'no activity / maximum pain' and '100' denote 'maximum activity / no pain'.
Day 0
Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A score)
Time Frame: Day 7 (plus or minus 1 day)
The validated questionnaire will be used to evaluate the outcome in Achilles tendinopathy. The score ranges from '0' to '100' whereas '0' denotes 'no activity / maximum pain' and '100' denote 'maximum activity / no pain'.
Day 7 (plus or minus 1 day)
Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A score)
Time Frame: Day 28 (plus or minus 3 days)
The validated questionnaire will be used to evaluate the outcome in Achilles tendinopathy. The score ranges from '0' to '100' whereas '0' denotes 'no activity / maximum pain' and '100' denote 'maximum activity / no pain'.
Day 28 (plus or minus 3 days)
Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A score)
Time Frame: Day 180 (plus or minus 3 days)
The validated questionnaire will be used to evaluate the outcome in Achilles tendinopathy. The score ranges from '0' to '100' whereas '0' denotes 'no activity / maximum pain' and '100' denote 'maximum activity / no pain'.
Day 180 (plus or minus 3 days)
Visual Analogue Scale of pain (VAS; 100 mm)
Time Frame: Day 0
Intensity of pain will be evaluated on the Huskisson VAS pain scale on which 0 mm indicate 'no pain' and 100 mm indicate 'extreme pain'.
Day 0
Visual Analogue Scale of pain (VAS; 100 mm)
Time Frame: Day 7 (plus or minus 1 day)
Intensity of pain will be evaluated on the Huskisson VAS pain scale on which 0 mm indicate 'no pain' and 100 mm indicate 'extreme pain'.
Day 7 (plus or minus 1 day)
Visual Analogue Scale of pain (VAS; 100 mm)
Time Frame: Day 28 (plus or minus 3 days)
Intensity of pain will be evaluated on the Huskisson VAS pain scale on which 0 mm indicate 'no pain' and 100 mm indicate 'extreme pain'.
Day 28 (plus or minus 3 days)
Visual Analogue Scale of pain (VAS; 100 mm)
Time Frame: Day 90 (plus or minus 3 days)
Intensity of pain will be evaluated on the Huskisson VAS pain scale on which 0 mm indicate 'no pain' and 100 mm indicate 'extreme pain'.
Day 90 (plus or minus 3 days)
Visual Analogue Scale of pain (VAS; 100 mm)
Time Frame: Day 180 (plus or minus 3 days)
Intensity of pain will be evaluated on the Huskisson VAS pain scale on which 0 mm indicate 'no pain' and 100 mm indicate 'extreme pain'.
Day 180 (plus or minus 3 days)
Patient's and investigator's global evaluation of study-relevant tendon complaints
Time Frame: Day 7 (plus or minus 1 day)
Measured by Clinical Global Impression (CGI) 7-point scale, ranking from 'very much improved' to 'very much worse' condition.
Day 7 (plus or minus 1 day)
Patient's and investigator's global evaluation of study-relevant tendon complaints
Time Frame: Day 28 (plus or minus 3 days)
Measured by Clinical Global Impression (CGI) 7-point scale, ranking from 'very much improved' to 'very much worse' condition.
Day 28 (plus or minus 3 days)
Patient's and investigator's global evaluation of study-relevant tendon complaints
Time Frame: Day 90 (plus or minus 3 days)
Measured by Clinical Global Impression (CGI) 7-point scale, ranking from 'very much improved' to 'very much worse' condition.
Day 90 (plus or minus 3 days)
Patient's and investigator's global evaluation of study-relevant tendon complaints
Time Frame: Day 180 (plus or minus 3 days)
Measured by Clinical Global Impression (CGI) 7-point scale, ranking from 'very much improved' to 'very much worse' condition.
Day 180 (plus or minus 3 days)
Clinical Parameters
Time Frame: Day 0
  • Redness
  • Warmth
  • Swelling
  • Tenderness on palpation
  • Crepitus on motion
  • Accumulation of tissue fluid

Measured by 5-point scale, ranking from 'none' to 'extreme' intensity.

Day 0
Clinical Parameters
Time Frame: Day 7 (plus or minus 1 day)
  • Redness
  • Warmth
  • Swelling
  • Tenderness on palpation
  • Crepitus on motion
  • Accumulation of tissue fluid

Measured by 5-point scale, ranking from 'none' to 'extreme' intensity.

Day 7 (plus or minus 1 day)
Clinical Parameters
Time Frame: Day 28 (plus or minus 3 days)
  • Redness
  • Warmth
  • Swelling
  • Tenderness on palpation
  • Crepitus on motion
  • Accumulation of tissue fluid

Measured by 5-point scale, ranking from 'none' to 'extreme' intensity.

Day 28 (plus or minus 3 days)
Clinical Parameters
Time Frame: Day 90 (plus or minus 3 days)
  • Redness
  • Warmth
  • Swelling
  • Tenderness on palpation
  • Crepitus on motion
  • Accumulation of tissue fluid

Measured by 5-point scale, ranking from 'none' to 'extreme' intensity.

Day 90 (plus or minus 3 days)
Clinical Parameters
Time Frame: Day 180 (plus or minus 3 days)
  • Redness
  • Warmth
  • Swelling
  • Tenderness on palpation
  • Crepitus on motion
  • Accumulation of tissue fluid

Measured by 5-point scale, ranking from 'none' to 'extreme' intensity.

Day 180 (plus or minus 3 days)
Frequency of test product-related Adverse Events
Time Frame: Up to Day 180
Up to Day 180

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thierry De Vroey, Dr. med., Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen, Fysische Geneeskunde en Revalidatie
  • Principal Investigator: Nils Lynen, Dr. med., Praxiszentrum Orthopädie-Unfallchirurgie Nordrhein

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

October 1, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 9, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2015

Last Verified

November 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tendinopathy

Clinical Trials on ESWT

3
Subscribe