Plasma Therapy for Diverse Wounds

April 23, 2026 updated by: Hu Zhicheng, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

A Prospective, Multicenter, Real-World Observational Study of a Plasma Device for Adjunctive Therapy in Acute Wounds, Chronic Wounds, Post-Grafting Wounds, and Sutured Wounds

This study is a prospective, multicenter, real-world observational study. It aims to evaluate whether adding plasma device therapy to standard wound care is effective and safe for treating different types of wounds, including acute wounds (such as burns and surgical incisions), chronic wounds (such as diabetic foot ulcers and pressure injuries), post-grafting wounds, and sutured wounds.

A total of 500 patients receiving standard wound care plus plasma therapy will be enrolled from multiple hospitals across China. Their outcomes will be compared with 500 matched patients who received standard wound care alone. The main outcomes include wound healing rate at 4 weeks, time to complete wound closure, pain relief, scar formation, and any side effects. Patients will be followed for up to 6 months.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

1000

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population will be recruited from patients presenting with acute wounds, chronic wounds, post-grafting wounds, or sutured wounds at the wound care centers, burn units, or plastic surgery departments of 10 participating tertiary hospitals across China.

Eligible participants are those who require wound management and meet the inclusion criteria. Patients in the plasma device group will be enrolled prospectively from those receiving standard wound care plus plasma device therapy as part of their routine clinical care. Control group participants will be derived from either: (1) concurrent patients receiving standard wound care alone at the same centers, or (2) retrospectively identified patients from medical records who received standard wound care without plasma therapy. Propensity score matching will be applied to balance baseline characteristics between the two groups.

No special restrictions on gender, race, or socioeconomic status will be applied. The study aims to reflect

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of any of the following wound types: acute wounds (burns, trauma, surgical incisions, skin avulsions), chronic wounds (diabetic foot ulcers, pressure injuries, venous ulcers, radiation ulcers, burn residual wounds), post-grafting wounds (autograft or allograft, including donor and recipient sites), or sutured wounds (postoperative incisions, flap surgery, tension-reducing sutures).
  • Age ≥ 12 years (for minors under 18 years, informed consent must be provided by a parent or legal guardian).
  • Stable vital signs and able to tolerate wound treatment.
  • Willing to participate and able to provide signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active malignant tumor involving the wound area.
  • Severe systemic infection or sepsis.
  • Severe immunodeficiency or long-term use of high-dose corticosteroids.
  • Intolerance to plasma therapy or refusal to participate.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Plasma Device Group
Patients receiving standard wound care plus plasma device therapy. The plasma device is applied to the wound bed at a distance of 5-10 mm for 3-10 minutes per session, once daily or every other day, until complete wound healing or suture removal.
Cold atmospheric plasma device used for non-contact wound treatment. The device generates low-temperature plasma with broad-spectrum antibacterial properties, promoting cell proliferation, modulating inflammation, and improving local microcirculation.
Conventional Treatment Group
Patients receiving standard wound care alone, including wound bed preparation (debridement, infection control, moist healing, dressing changes). This group does not receive plasma device therapy. Patients may be derived from retrospective cases or concurrent non-plasma users, with confounding factors controlled by propensity score matching.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complete Wound Healing Rate at 4 Weeks
Time Frame: 4 weeks after enrollment
Proportion of wounds (acute wounds, post-grafting wounds, and sutured wounds) achieving complete epithelialization without drainage at 4 weeks post-treatment.
4 weeks after enrollment
Proportion of Wounds Achieving ≥50% Area Reduction at 4 Weeks
Time Frame: 4 weeks after enrollment
For chronic wounds (diabetic foot ulcers, pressure injuries, venous ulcers, radiation ulcers, etc.), the proportion of wounds showing a reduction in wound area of 50% or more compared to baseline at 4 weeks.
4 weeks after enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Complete Wound Healing
Time Frame: From enrollment to complete epithelialization, assessed up to 6 months
Number of days from initial treatment to complete wound closure (100% re-epithelialization).
From enrollment to complete epithelialization, assessed up to 6 months
Change in Pain Score (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline, day 3, day 7, day 14, day 21, day 28
Pain intensity is measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Scores range from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate worse pain (0 = no pain, 10 = worst possible pain).
Baseline, day 3, day 7, day 14, day 21, day 28
Change in Pain Relief/Satisfaction (ASA)
Time Frame: Baseline, day 3, day 7, day 14, day 21, day 28
Pain relief and satisfaction are measured using the Analog Scale of Appreciation (ASA). Scores range from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate better pain relief or greater satisfaction (0 = no appreciation/relief, 10 = complete appreciation/relief).
Baseline, day 3, day 7, day 14, day 21, day 28
Wound Area Reduction Rate
Time Frame: Day 7, day 14, day 28
Percentage reduction in wound area calculated as (baseline area - current area) / baseline area × 100%.
Day 7, day 14, day 28
Scar Assessment
Time Frame: Month 1, month 3, month 6
Scar quality is evaluated using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) , which assesses vascularity, pigmentation, pliability, and height. The total score ranges from 0 to 13, with higher scores indicating worse scar quality (e.g., greater vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, and reduced pliability).
Month 1, month 3, month 6
Wound Recurrence Rate
Time Frame: Proportion of participants experiencing recurrence of a wound at the same anatomical site within 6 months after complete healing.
6 months after enrollment
Proportion of participants experiencing recurrence of a wound at the same anatomical site within 6 months after complete healing.
Functional Recovery - Local Sensory Function
Time Frame: 6 months after enrollment
Local sensory function of the healed wound area is assessed by sensory testing. Unit of Measure: Present vs. absent (or reduced) sensation; or specific monofilament rating (e.g., 2.0-6.0). Higher scores or "present" indicate better sensory function.
6 months after enrollment
Functional Recovery - Sweating Function
Time Frame: 6 months after enrollment

Sweating function of the healed wound area is assessed by sweat test (e.g., starch-iodine test).

Unit of Measure: Present vs. absent (or reduced) sweating; or area of sweating (cm²). Higher scores or "present" indicate better sweating function.

6 months after enrollment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Adverse Events
Time Frame: From enrollment to 6 months follow-up
Proportion of participants experiencing local adverse reactions (burns, erythema, blisters, increased exudate, allergy) or systemic adverse reactions (fever, infection spread). Rate of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events will also be recorded.
From enrollment to 6 months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 17, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 28, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 28, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • hzc-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Wound Care

Clinical Trials on Plasma Device

Subscribe