Effect of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Combined With Autologous Platelet-rich Plasma Injection on Rotator Cuff Calcific Tendinitis

April 17, 2024 updated by: Xiali Xue

Effect of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Combined With Autologous Platelet-rich Plasma Injection on Rotator Cuff Calcific Tendinitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to explore the effect of extracorporeal shock wave combined with autologous platelet-rich plasma injection on the rehabilitation of rotator cuff calcific tendinitis, to provide new treatment methods and evidence for the rehabilitation of rotator cuff calcific tendinitis, and to reduce patients; pain and return to normal life as soon as possible.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to explore the effect of extracorporeal shock wave combined with autologous platelet-rich plasma injection on the rehabilitation of rotator cuff calcific tendinitis, to provide new treatment methods and evidence for the rehabilitation of rotator cuff calcific tendinitis, and to reduce patients' pain and return to normal life as soon as possible.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Chengdu Sport University Xiali Xue
  • Phone Number: +86 28 8509 4700
  • Email: 390231882@qq.com

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Meet the diagnostic criteria for rotator cuff calcific tendonitis, aged between 40 and 60 years old
  • Persistent pain in the affected shoulder, with obvious tenderness under the acromion and rotator cuff, as confirmed by X-ray and Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) examination showed one or more round-shaped high-density calcium salt deposits near the greater tuberosity of the humerus
  • All were diagnosed for the first time
  • Complaints of severe pain in the shoulder joint, obvious

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Combined with rotator cuff trauma, long head of biceps tendonitis and other shoulder joint diseases
  • Past combined history of shoulder joint surgery
  • Patients with internal fixation of the shoulder joint
  • Shoulder joint combined with infection, Tumors and other lesions
  • Combined with severe heart, liver, and kidney dysfunction
  • Do not agree to participate in the study or fail to sign the informed consent form.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy group
In the shoulder pain points, choose 2 to 3 of them for each treatment, apply the coupling agent, which is convenient for the treatment head to stick to the skin, and complete the longitudinal treatment and horizontal treatment. The setting frequency was 4 ~ 8 Hz, the length of the probe was 15 mm, and the pressure was set at 1.5 mJ/mm2. The frequency of each treatment point reached 2 000 ~ 2 500 times, and the hand-held pressure was set to medium-high level. A total of 6 treatments were completed. For patients with unclear pain points or regional pain, the treatment point should be supraspinatus tendon or infraspinatus tendon, and the treatment should be completed with the most severe pain site.
In the shoulder pain points, choose 2 to 3 of them for each treatment, apply the coupling agent, which is convenient for the treatment head to stick to the skin, and complete the longitudinal treatment and horizontal treatment. The setting frequency was 4 ~ 8 Hz, the length of the probe was 15 mm, and the pressure was set at 1.5 mJ/mm2. The frequency of each treatment point reached 2 000 ~ 2 500 times, and the hand-held pressure was set to medium-high level. A total of 6 treatments were completed. For patients with unclear pain points or regional pain, the treatment point should be supraspinatus tendon or infraspinatus tendon, and the treatment should be completed with the most severe pain site.
Experimental: Platelet-rich plasma group
Autologous Platelet-rich plasma injection was performed under ultrasound guidance
Autologous Platelet-rich plasma injection was performed under ultrasound guidance
Experimental: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy+Platelet-rich plasma group
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy followed by Platelet-rich plasma injection
In the shoulder pain points, choose 2 to 3 of them for each treatment, apply the coupling agent, which is convenient for the treatment head to stick to the skin, and complete the longitudinal treatment and horizontal treatment. The setting frequency was 4 ~ 8 Hz, the length of the probe was 15 mm, and the pressure was set at 1.5 mJ/mm2. The frequency of each treatment point reached 2 000 ~ 2 500 times, and the hand-held pressure was set to medium-high level. A total of 6 treatments were completed. For patients with unclear pain points or regional pain, the treatment point should be supraspinatus tendon or infraspinatus tendon, and the treatment should be completed with the most severe pain site.
Autologous Platelet-rich plasma injection was performed under ultrasound guidance

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analogue Scale,VAS
Time Frame: After 1, 2, 4 and 8 weeks of intervention

The full name of the Scale is Visual Analogue Scale, that is, visual analogue scale.

Minimum value and maximum value: the minimum value of the VAS scale is 0, indicating "completely painless" or "painless end"; The maximum value is 10, which indicates "the most severe pain imaginable" or "the most severe pain end." Score Significance: On the VAS scale, a higher score means a worse outcome, i.e. a greater degree of pain. The patient marks the corresponding position on the scale according to their pain experience, thus indicating the intensity of the pain.

After 1, 2, 4 and 8 weeks of intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon's Form,ASES
Time Frame: After 1, 2, 4 and 8 weeks of intervention

The full name of the scale: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score, namely, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score.

Minimum value and maximum value: The minimum value of ASES scale is 0 and the maximum value is 100.

Score Significance: On the ASES scale, a higher score means a better outcome, i.e. a better functional state of the shoulder or a milder condition.

After 1, 2, 4 and 8 weeks of intervention
the university of California at Los Angeles shoulder rating scale, UCLA
Time Frame: After 1, 2, 4 and 8 weeks of intervention

Full name of the Scale: University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale.

Minimum and maximum values: The minimum value of the UCLA Shoulder Joint Scoring Scale is usually 0, and the maximum value may vary depending on the version and scoring rules, but a common maximum value is 35.

Score Significance: On the UCLA Shoulder Joint Rating Scale, a higher score generally means a better outcome, i.e. better shoulder function or less pain.

After 1, 2, 4 and 8 weeks of intervention
The location and size of the calcifications were examined by ultrasound
Time Frame: After 4 and 8 weeks of intervention
After 4 and 8 weeks of intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 20, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 10, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

To protect patient privacy, the investigators have chosen not to share data for the time being.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rotator Cuff Tendinitis

Clinical Trials on Extracorporeal shock wave therapy device

Subscribe