AI-Generated Versus Human Feedback in Preclinical Restorative Dentistry (AIF-HF)
Artificial Intelligence-Generated Feedback Versus Human Feedback in Preclinical Restorative Dentistry: Effects on Performance, State Anxiety, and Student Perception
Studieoversigt
Status
Status
Betingelser
Betingelser
Intervention / Behandling
Intervention / Behandling
Undersøgelsestype
Undersøgelsestype
Tilmelding (Faktiske)
Tilmelding
Fase
Fase
- Ikke anvendelig
Kontakter og lokationer
Studiesteder
-
-
-
Adana, Tyrkiet (Türkiye)
- Cukurova University Faculty of Dentistry
-
-
Deltagelseskriterier
Berettigelseskriterier
Berettigelseskriterier
Aldre berettiget til at studere
- Voksen
- Ældre voksen
Tager imod sunde frivillige
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
Third-year dental students enrolled in the preclinical restorative dentistry course at Cukurova University Faculty of Dentistry.
Attendance at the scheduled practical training session. Provision of written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
Students who declined to participate. Students who did not complete the practical training session. Students with incomplete performance assessment or questionnaire data.
Studieplan
Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?
Design detaljer
- Primært formål: Andet
- Tildeling: Ikke-randomiseret
- Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
- Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)
Antal våben
Våben og indgreb
Deltagergruppe / ArmDeltagergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / BehandlingIntervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentel: AI-Generated Feedback
Participants received formative feedback generated by an artificial intelligence chatbot during preclinical restorative dentistry training.
Feedback was provided according to predefined evaluation criteria and was intended to support students' practical skill development.
|
Participants received formative feedback generated by an artificial intelligence chatbot during preclinical restorative dentistry training.
Feedback was based on predefined evaluation criteria and was provided to support practical skill development and learning.
|
|
Aktiv komparator: Human Instructor Feedback
Participants received formative feedback from a faculty instructor during preclinical restorative dentistry training.
Feedback was provided according to the same predefined evaluation criteria used in the AI-generated feedback group.
|
Participants received formative feedback from a faculty instructor during preclinical restorative dentistry training.
Feedback was provided according to predefined evaluation criteria.
|
Hvad måler undersøgelsen?
Primære resultatmål
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Practical Performance Score
Tidsramme: At completion of the preclinical training session (approximately 2 weeks after study initiation)
|
Students' practical performance was evaluated using a standardized rubric consisting of eight assessment criteria for preclinical restorative dentistry procedures.
Total scores ranged from 0 to 16, with higher scores indicating better practical performance.
|
At completion of the preclinical training session (approximately 2 weeks after study initiation)
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in State Anxiety
Tidsramme: Baseline (before the practical session) and immediately after completion of the practical session (approximately 2 hours).
|
State anxiety was assessed using the 5-item State Anxiety Inventory (STAIS-5), a shortened version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.
The total score ranges from 5 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater state anxiety.
A score of 10 or higher indicates clinically significant state anxiety.
|
Baseline (before the practical session) and immediately after completion of the practical session (approximately 2 hours).
|
|
Student Perception of the Feedback Method
Tidsramme: Immediately after completion of the practical training session (approximately 2 hours after baseline).
|
Student perception was assessed using an 8-item, 5-point Likert questionnaire.
The reported outcome was the mean questionnaire score, ranging from 1.0 to 5.0, with higher scores indicating more positive perceptions of the feedback method.
|
Immediately after completion of the practical training session (approximately 2 hours after baseline).
|
Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere
Sponsor
Sponsor
Datoer for undersøgelser
Studer store datoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
Studiestart
Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)
Primær færdiggørelse
Studieafslutning (Faktiske)
Studieafslutning
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først indsendt
Først indsendt
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
Først opslået (Faktiske)
Først opslået
Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler
Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)
Sidste opdatering sendt
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
Sidst verificeret
Sidst verificeret
Mere information
Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
- REC163-42-2026
Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)
Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?
Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt
Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .