AI-Generated Versus Human Feedback in Preclinical Restorative Dentistry (AIF-HF)
Artificial Intelligence-Generated Feedback Versus Human Feedback in Preclinical Restorative Dentistry: Effects on Performance, State Anxiety, and Student Perception
Studieoversikt
Status
Status
Forhold
Forhold
Intervensjon / Behandling
Intervensjon / Behandling
Studietype
Studietype
Registrering (Faktiske)
Registrering
Fase
Fase
- Ikke aktuelt
Kontakter og plasseringer
Studiesteder
-
-
-
Adana, Tyrkia (Türkiye)
- Cukurova University Faculty of Dentistry
-
-
Deltakelseskriterier
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
- Voksen
- Eldre voksen
Tar imot friske frivillige
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
Third-year dental students enrolled in the preclinical restorative dentistry course at Cukurova University Faculty of Dentistry.
Attendance at the scheduled practical training session. Provision of written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
Students who declined to participate. Students who did not complete the practical training session. Students with incomplete performance assessment or questionnaire data.
Studieplan
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
- Primært formål: Annen
- Tildeling: Ikke-randomisert
- Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
- Masking: Ingen (Open Label)
Antall våpen
Våpen og intervensjoner
Deltakergruppe / ArmDeltakergruppe / Arm |
Intervensjon / BehandlingIntervensjon / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentell: AI-Generated Feedback
Participants received formative feedback generated by an artificial intelligence chatbot during preclinical restorative dentistry training.
Feedback was provided according to predefined evaluation criteria and was intended to support students' practical skill development.
|
Participants received formative feedback generated by an artificial intelligence chatbot during preclinical restorative dentistry training.
Feedback was based on predefined evaluation criteria and was provided to support practical skill development and learning.
|
|
Aktiv komparator: Human Instructor Feedback
Participants received formative feedback from a faculty instructor during preclinical restorative dentistry training.
Feedback was provided according to the same predefined evaluation criteria used in the AI-generated feedback group.
|
Participants received formative feedback from a faculty instructor during preclinical restorative dentistry training.
Feedback was provided according to predefined evaluation criteria.
|
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Practical Performance Score
Tidsramme: At completion of the preclinical training session (approximately 2 weeks after study initiation)
|
Students' practical performance was evaluated using a standardized rubric consisting of eight assessment criteria for preclinical restorative dentistry procedures.
Total scores ranged from 0 to 16, with higher scores indicating better practical performance.
|
At completion of the preclinical training session (approximately 2 weeks after study initiation)
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in State Anxiety
Tidsramme: Baseline (before the practical session) and immediately after completion of the practical session (approximately 2 hours).
|
State anxiety was assessed using the 5-item State Anxiety Inventory (STAIS-5), a shortened version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.
The total score ranges from 5 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater state anxiety.
A score of 10 or higher indicates clinically significant state anxiety.
|
Baseline (before the practical session) and immediately after completion of the practical session (approximately 2 hours).
|
|
Student Perception of the Feedback Method
Tidsramme: Immediately after completion of the practical training session (approximately 2 hours after baseline).
|
Student perception was assessed using an 8-item, 5-point Likert questionnaire.
The reported outcome was the mean questionnaire score, ranging from 1.0 to 5.0, with higher scores indicating more positive perceptions of the feedback method.
|
Immediately after completion of the practical training session (approximately 2 hours after baseline).
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Sponsor
Sponsor
Studierekorddatoer
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
Studiestart
Primær fullføring (Faktiske)
Primær fullføring
Studiet fullført (Faktiske)
Studiet fullført
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
Først innsendt
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Først lagt ut (Faktiske)
Først lagt ut
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)
Sist oppdatering lagt ut
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Sist bekreftet
Sist bekreftet
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Andre studie-ID-numre
Andre studie-ID-numre
- REC163-42-2026
Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)
Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?
Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .