Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Inertial Sensors Used to Learn Manipulation

3. december 2014 opdateret af: Dr. Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas, University of Malaga

EFFECT OF REAL-TIME FEEDBACK THROUGH INERTIAL SENSORS IN LEARNING POSTEROANTERIOR THORACIC MANIPULATION

  • Background Context: no studies have been identified to analyse the effect of real time feedback (using inertial sensors) on physiotherapy students learning the art of posterior-anterior thoracic manipulation (PATM).
  • Purpose: to study the effect caused by real-time feedback on the learning process for PATM, comparing two undergraduate physiotherapy student groups. Hypothesis: significant differences will exist in the execution parameters of manipulation among students receiving real-time feedback versus those who do not.
  • Study Design/Setting: longitudinal, pre-post intervention.
  • Patient Sample: Sixty-one undergraduate physiotherapy students were divided randomly into two groups, G1 (n = 31) (group without feedback in real time) and G2 (n = 30) (group with real-time feedback).
  • Outcome Measures: time, displacement and velocity and improvement (only between groups) to reach maximum peak, to reach minimum peak from maximum peak, total manipulation time.
  • Methods: two groups of physiotherapy students learned PATM, one using a traditional method and the other using real-time feedback (inertial sensor). Measures were obtained pre- and post-intervention. Intragroup pre- and post-intervention and intergroup post-intervention scores were calculated. An analysis of the measures' stability was developed through an ICC (1,2).
  • Results: the values of ICC ranged from 0.881 to 0.997. Statistically significant differences were found in all variables analysed (intra- and inter-group) in favour of G2.
  • Conclusions: the learning process for posterior-anterior thoracic manipulation is facilitated when the student receives real-time feedback.

Studieoversigt

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

64

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

18 år til 65 år (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ja

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants did not have any training in manual therapy techniques, especially those involving a high velocity, low amplitude execution.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to participate in the study

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Crossover opgave
  • Maskning: Dobbelt

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Eksperimentel: Real Time Feedback
Before beginning practice, one of the teachers performed the manipulation and explained the graph parameters as real-time feedback to consider when interpreting the graph, leaving the graphic as the benchmark execution
Before beginning practice, one of the teachers performed the manipulation and explained the graph parameters as real-time feedback to consider when interpreting the graph, leaving the graphic as the benchmark execution
Aktiv komparator: Tradicional Learning Method
Two expert teachers in manual therapy provided indications and corrections to the group with a teacher - student ratio of 1:8
Two expert teachers in manual therapy provided indications and corrections to the group with a teacher - student ratio of 1:8.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Change from displacement maximum peak (seconds)
Tidsramme: baseline; post-education; 24 weeks follow up
An instrumented manikin (Resusci Anne Full Body with signal box, Laerdal Medical AS) joined an inertial sensor (Inertial Cube (Intersense Inc, USA)) was used to register the physical parameters during execution of the PATM. The inertial sensor was placed in the middle of the thoracic spine, placing hands immediately below the sensor. The manikin has a ribcage with a deformation capacity similar to that of a human thorax. This option was chosen to minimize the power variation when comparing differences in parameters between different groups of students. The inclusion criteria used were that they did not have any training in manual therapy techniques, especially those involving a high velocity, low amplitude execution.
baseline; post-education; 24 weeks follow up
Change from Time to reach maximum peak (seconds)
Tidsramme: baseline; post-education; 24 weeks follow up
An instrumented manikin (Resusci Anne Full Body with signal box, Laerdal Medical AS) joined an inertial sensor (Inertial Cube (Intersense Inc, USA)) was used to register the physical parameters during execution of the PATM. The inertial sensor was placed in the middle of the thoracic spine, placing hands immediately below the sensor. The manikin has a ribcage with a deformation capacity similar to that of a human thorax. This option was chosen to minimize the power variation when comparing differences in parameters between different groups of students. The inclusion criteria used were that they did not have any training in manual therapy techniques, especially those involving a high velocity, low amplitude execution.
baseline; post-education; 24 weeks follow up
Change from Displacement between maximum and minimum peak (milimitres)
Tidsramme: baseline; post-education; 24 weeks follow up
An instrumented manikin (Resusci Anne Full Body with signal box, Laerdal Medical AS) joined an inertial sensor (Inertial Cube (Intersense Inc, USA)) was used to register the physical parameters during execution of the PATM. The inertial sensor was placed in the middle of the thoracic spine, placing hands immediately below the sensor. The manikin has a ribcage with a deformation capacity similar to that of a human thorax. This option was chosen to minimize the power variation when comparing differences in parameters between different groups of students. The inclusion criteria used were that they did not have any training in manual therapy techniques, especially those involving a high velocity, low amplitude execution.
baseline; post-education; 24 weeks follow up
Change from Total manipulation time (seconds)
Tidsramme: baseline; post-education; 24 weeks follow up
An instrumented manikin (Resusci Anne Full Body with signal box, Laerdal Medical AS) joined an inertial sensor (Inertial Cube (Intersense Inc, USA)) was used to register the physical parameters during execution of the PATM. The inertial sensor was placed in the middle of the thoracic spine, placing hands immediately below the sensor. The manikin has a ribcage with a deformation capacity similar to that of a human thorax. This option was chosen to minimize the power variation when comparing differences in parameters between different groups of students. The inclusion criteria used were that they did not have any training in manual therapy techniques, especially those involving a high velocity, low amplitude execution.
baseline; post-education; 24 weeks follow up
Change from Velocity to reach maximum peak (degrees per second)
Tidsramme: baseline; post-education; 24 weeks follow up
An instrumented manikin (Resusci Anne Full Body with signal box, Laerdal Medical AS) joined an inertial sensor (Inertial Cube (Intersense Inc, USA)) was used to register the physical parameters during execution of the PATM. The inertial sensor was placed in the middle of the thoracic spine, placing hands immediately below the sensor. The manikin has a ribcage with a deformation capacity similar to that of a human thorax. This option was chosen to minimize the power variation when comparing differences in parameters between different groups of students. The inclusion criteria used were that they did not have any training in manual therapy techniques, especially those involving a high velocity, low amplitude execution.
baseline; post-education; 24 weeks follow up
Change from Time to reach peak minimum from maximum peak (seconds)
Tidsramme: baseline; post-education; 24 weeks follow up
An instrumented manikin (Resusci Anne Full Body with signal box, Laerdal Medical AS) joined an inertial sensor (Inertial Cube (Intersense Inc, USA)) was used to register the physical parameters during execution of the PATM. The inertial sensor was placed in the middle of the thoracic spine, placing hands immediately below the sensor. The manikin has a ribcage with a deformation capacity similar to that of a human thorax. This option was chosen to minimize the power variation when comparing differences in parameters between different groups of students. The inclusion criteria used were that they did not have any training in manual therapy techniques, especially those involving a high velocity, low amplitude execution.
baseline; post-education; 24 weeks follow up
Change from Velocity to reach minimum peak from maximum peak (degress/second)
Tidsramme: baseline; post-education; 24 weeks follow up
An instrumented manikin (Resusci Anne Full Body with signal box, Laerdal Medical AS) joined an inertial sensor (Inertial Cube (Intersense Inc, USA)) was used to register the physical parameters during execution of the PATM. The inertial sensor was placed in the middle of the thoracic spine, placing hands immediately below the sensor. The manikin has a ribcage with a deformation capacity similar to that of a human thorax. This option was chosen to minimize the power variation when comparing differences in parameters between different groups of students. The inclusion criteria used were that they did not have any training in manual therapy techniques, especially those involving a high velocity, low amplitude execution.
baseline; post-education; 24 weeks follow up

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Efterforskere

  • Ledende efterforsker: Manuel González-Sánchez, PT, PhD, University of Malaga
  • Ledende efterforsker: Yves Lenfant, PT, University of Malaga

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart

1. februar 2012

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

1. juni 2012

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

1. september 2012

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

23. juli 2013

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

29. juli 2013

Først opslået (Skøn)

30. juli 2013

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Skøn)

4. december 2014

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

3. december 2014

Sidst verificeret

1. juli 2013

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • ACuesta07072013

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Medicinsk Uddannelse

Kliniske forsøg med Real Time Feedback

Abonner