Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Cholangioscopy or Conventional Techniques for Indeterminate Biliary Stenosis

7. april 2021 opdateret af: Frederic PRAT, MD, PhD

Comparison of Two Diagnostic Strategies in Indeterminate Biliary Stenosis: Exploration by Retrograde Cholangioscopy From the Outset or After Failure of Conventional Techniques

Biliary stenosis not associated with a mass is difficult to diagnose with certainty. The diagnosis is usually based on a first-line cytological study of biliary brushing, which allows a diagnosis in 30 to 50% of cases. In the event of negativity, it is then possible to perform a cholangioscopy in a second step, which allows better sensitivity by performing biopsies. Performing cholangioscopy from the start could potentially save time and avoid disturbances associated with intermediate biliary stenting.

The main objective is to compare two strategies for exploring indeterminate biliary stenosis (1st vs. 2nd line retrograde cholangioscopy) in terms of diagnostic performance. The secondary objectives are to compare the same two strategies in terms of effectiveness, side effects and cost-effectiveness.

The primary outcome measure is the diagnostic yield (performance) of the initial investigation of indeterminate biliary stenosis: cytological brushing followed by cholangioscopy in case of failure (control group) or cholangioscopy from the start (study group).

Studieoversigt

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Forventet)

150

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiekontakt

Undersøgelse Kontakt Backup

Studiesteder

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

18 år til 85 år (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of intra- or extrahepatic biliary stenosis, involving the main bile ducts: common hepatic duct, right and left hepatic ducts
  • Presence of clinical jaundice and / or biological cholestasis (GGT> 3N)
  • Absence of visible mass near the biliary stenosis after initial morphological assessment by abdominal CT scan, MRI with biliary sequences.
  • Endoscopic ultrasound performed and not having allowed the acquisition of material of diagnostic interest by guided puncture of the lesion.
  • No history of ERCP in the 6 months preceding inclusion and no biliary prosthesis (plastic or metal) in place at the time of inclusion
  • Collegial validation of the need for a formal diagnosis of indeterminate biliary stenosis in order to guide therapeutic management
  • Patients aged 18 to 85
  • Patient who gave his consent to participate in the study
  • No contraindication to anesthesia (ASA 1, 2,3)
  • Patient affiliated to a social security scheme (beneficiary or beneficiary)
  • Absence of pregnancy and current contraception in women of childbearing age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of a manifest tissue mass in relation to the biliary stenosis on CT and / or MRI imaging.
  • Very strong presumption of the etiological diagnosis of biliary stenosis given the history (history, background): i.e. liver surgery, cholecystectomy, autoimmunity
  • History of ERCP and / or percutaneous biliary drainage in the 6 months preceding inclusion
  • Presence of a plastic or metal biliary prosthesis in place at the time of inclusion
  • History of cephalic duodeno-pancreatectomy or hepatico-jejunal anastomosis
  • Non-passable stenosis of the main bile duct
  • Severe coagulopathy, thrombocytopenia <75,000 G / L, treatment with clopidogrel cannot be interrupted even temporarily
  • Anesthetic contraindication (ASA 4)
  • Inability to obtain informed consent
  • person deprived of liberty

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Diagnostisk
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Aktiv komparator: cytological brushing followed by cholangioscopy in case of failure
endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with cholangioscopy in the first procedure for exploration of an indeterminate biliary stenosis and biliary drainage
Eksperimentel: cholangioscopy from the start
endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with cholangioscopy in the first procedure for exploration of an indeterminate biliary stenosis and biliary drainage

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Diagnostic yield (performance) of the initial investigation of indeterminate biliary stenosis: cytological brushing followed by cholangioscopy in case of failure (control group) or cholangioscopy from the start (study group).
Tidsramme: 48 months
Diagnostic performance is expressed primarily by sensitivity for the diagnosis of malignancy.
48 months

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tidsramme
Specific rate of diagnosis with cholangioscopy by spyglass used in 1st or 2nd intention
Tidsramme: 48 months
48 months
Rate of adverse events related to diagnostic procedures in each of the 2 groups
Tidsramme: 48 months
48 months
Comparison of the costs of the 2 diagnostic strategies
Tidsramme: 48 months
48 months

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

26. december 2018

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

26. december 2018

Studieafslutning (Forventet)

26. december 2022

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

7. april 2021

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

7. april 2021

Først opslået (Faktiske)

12. april 2021

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

12. april 2021

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

7. april 2021

Sidst verificeret

1. april 2021

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • SFED 131

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Ondartet galdestenose

Abonner