Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Dry-Shield vs Rubber Dam During Fissure Sealant Placement (DRY-SEAL)

26. maj 2026 opdateret af: Suez Canal University

Efficiency of Using Dry-Shield and Rubber Dam Isolation on Fissure Sealant Application in Permanent Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate the efficiency of the Dry-Shield isolation system compared with rubber dam isolation and cotton roll isolation during fissure sealant application in permanent molars among pediatric patients.

The study evaluates chairside time, patient preference, and fissure sealant retention rates after 6 and 12 months of follow-up. Proper isolation during fissure sealant application is considered essential for optimal retention and long-term clinical success.

The study also aims to assess whether Dry-Shield can provide a practical and comfortable alternative to conventional isolation techniques in pediatric dentistry.

Studieoversigt

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Fissure sealants are widely used preventive measures for reducing occlusal caries in permanent molars. Successful sealant retention largely depends on adequate moisture control during application. Rubber dam isolation has traditionally been considered the gold standard for moisture control; however, its use in pediatric dentistry may be associated with increased chair time and patient discomfort.

Dry-Shield is an isolation device that combines suction, tongue retraction, bite block support, and moisture control in a single system. This may improve clinical efficiency and patient comfort during dental procedures.

This randomized clinical trial compares the Dry-Shield isolation system with rubber dam isolation and cotton roll isolation during fissure sealant application in permanent molars in children. The study evaluates clinical efficiency through assessment of chairside time, patient preference, and fissure sealant retention at 6 and 12month follow-ups.

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

30

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

    • Ismailia Governorate
      • Ismailia, Ismailia Governorate, Egypten, 41522
        • Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Barn

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ja

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

A- Patient inclusion criteria:

  1. Cooperative, apparently healthy children.
  2. Each child had at least three fully erupted first and/or second permanent molars.
  3. Patient being at high risk of dental caries.
  4. Informed consent was filled before treatment.

B- Molar inclusion criteria:

  1. Tooth had deep pits and fissures.
  2. Molars with the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) score 0-2.
  3. All three molars required PFS.

Exclusion Criteria:

A- Patient exclusion criteria:

  1. Uncooperative children.
  2. Children with special needs.
  3. Children who required emergency dental care (draining sinus, abscess and cellulitis).
  4. Who were suffering from an allergy to latex or a severe gag reflex.
  5. Mouth breather or child with nasal obstruction.
  6. Children with fixed orthodontic.

B- Molar exclusion criteria:

  1. Previous restored or carious first or second permanent molars.
  2. Molars with anomalies of the enamel or dentin.

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Forebyggelse
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Crossover opgave
  • Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Eksperimentel: Group 1: Dry-Shield Isolation
Participants receive pit and fissure sealant using Dry-Shield isolation system in a split-mouth design.
Application of a fluoride-releasing, resin-based pit and fissure sealant (Conseal F) on eligible permanent molars to evaluate and compare the clinical efficiency of three different isolation methods.
Aktiv komparator: Group 2: Rubber Dam Isolation
Participants receive pit and fissure sealant using rubber dam isolation technique in a split-mouth design.
Application of a fluoride-releasing, resin-based pit and fissure sealant (Conseal F) on eligible permanent molars to evaluate and compare the clinical efficiency of three different isolation methods.
Aktiv komparator: Group 3: Cotton Roll Isolation
Participants receive pit and fissure sealant using cotton roll isolation technique in a split-mouth design
Application of a fluoride-releasing, resin-based pit and fissure sealant (Conseal F) on eligible permanent molars to evaluate and compare the clinical efficiency of three different isolation methods.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Sealant Retention Rate
Tidsramme: 6 months and 12 months
Evaluation of fissure sealant retention using Simonsen criteria after 6 and 12 months.
6 months and 12 months

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Chairside Time
Tidsramme: Immediately during procedure
Assessment of the time required for fissure sealant application using each isolation technique
Immediately during procedure
Patient Preference and discomfort
Tidsramme: Immediately after procedure
Assessment of patient preference and discomfort using a questionnaire and Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale after fissure sealant placement
Immediately after procedure

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

26. februar 2025

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

29. april 2026

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

8. maj 2026

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

26. maj 2026

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

26. maj 2026

Først opslået (Faktiske)

3. juni 2026

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

3. juni 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

26. maj 2026

Sidst verificeret

1. maj 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

IPD-planbeskrivelse

To protect patient privacy and maintain confidentiality, individual participant data will not be made publicly available

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Grube- og sprækkeforseglinger

Kliniske forsøg med Pit and fissure sealant (Conseal F)

Abonner