Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Efficacy and Safety of Hematoma Block Versus Brachial Plexus Block for Closed Reduction of Extra-Articular Distal Radius Fracture: A Prospective Study

31. maj 2026 opdateret af: Rohit Shrestha, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences

EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF HEMATOMA BLOCK VERSUS BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK FOR CLOSED REDUCTION OF EXTRA-ARTICULAR DISTAL RADIUS FRACTURE: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY

Distal radius fractures are one of the most common types of fractures, affecting mostly youngsters and the elderly. Safety, ease of use, affordability, and effectiveness all play a role in analgesia during reduction. This study's goal is to assess how well the Hematoma Block (HB) reduces distal forearm fractures in a developing nation like Nepal. At a tertiary care hospital, a randomized comparative study is used. The individuals with distal forearm fractures that have been radiologically confirmed are enrolled after taking informed consent. When reducing distal forearm fractures, the patients are divided into two groups: Brachial Plexus Block (BPB group) and Hematoma Block group. We note the level of pain before, during, and after reduction using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in both groups. The patient's radiological correction is assessed by Modified Sarmiento Criteria with an immediate post reduction radiograph.

Comparing Hematoma Block and Brachial Plexus Block, we can choose a definitive easy method for reduction that is easy, safe and less time consuming. Hence, the study will provide a guide for commonly occurring distal radius fracture.

Hypotheses of the Study:

Null hypothesis (Ho): There is no difference between feasibility, safety and quality of reduction in the two groups of anesthesia techniques.

Ho: Safety, efficacy and quality of reduction with Hematoma block = Brachial plexus block

Alternate hypothesis (H1): There is a difference between feasibility, safety and quality of reduction in the two groups of anesthesia techniques.

H1: Safety, efficacy and quality of reduction with Hematoma block ≠ Brachial plexus block

Studieoversigt

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

90

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

    • Bagmati
      • Dhulikhel, Bagmati, Nepal, 45200
        • Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Voksen
  • Ældre voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Beskrivelse

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Adult male or female patients in the age range of skeletally mature (18 years and above)
  2. Displaced distal radius fracture, requiring manipulation
  3. Only extra-articular fractures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Open fractures (Gustilo Anderson open fracture Type I, II and III), intra-articular fractures, and comminuted fractures.
  2. Undisplaced distal radial fractures which do not require manipulation.
  3. Patients who have a history of an adverse reaction to local anesthetics.
  4. Polytrauma, multiple injuries

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Ikke-randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Eksperimentel: Brachial Plexus Block
Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia administered by anesthesiology personnel
Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia administered by anesthesiology personnel
Aktiv komparator: Hematoma Block
Local anesthetic infiltration into the fracture hematoma by an orthopedic surgeon/resident.
Local anesthetic infiltration into the fracture hematoma by an orthopedic surgeon/resident.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Pain Severity Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Tidsramme: 1 year
Pain severity during fracture reduction will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), a 10-point scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst imaginable pain. Pain scores will be recorded prior to, during, and immediately following fracture reduction. Higher scores indicate worse pain severity.
1 year
Quality of Fracture Reduction Assessed by Plain Radiographic Parameters
Tidsramme: 1 year
Quality of reduction following fracture manipulation will be assessed using plain radiographs in posteroanterior (PA) and lateral views. Radiographic parameters include ulnar variance (mm), radial length (mm), radial tilt (degrees), and dorsal/palmar tilt (degrees). Measurements will be compared between hematoma block and brachial plexus block groups.
1 year

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Procedure-Related Complications
Tidsramme: 1 year
Complications related to fracture reduction or anesthesia technique will be recorded during hospital stay and follow-up. Complications may include neurovascular injury, compartment syndrome, local anesthetic-related adverse events, infection, or failure of reduction. Outcome will be reported as number and percentage of participants experiencing complications.
1 year

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

20. januar 2024

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

1. april 2026

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

2. april 2026

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

24. maj 2026

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

31. maj 2026

Først opslået (Faktiske)

4. juni 2026

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

4. juni 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

31. maj 2026

Sidst verificeret

1. januar 2024

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

JA

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Distal Radius Fraktur

Kliniske forsøg med Brachial Plexus Block

Abonner