Feasibility and Preliminary Performance of an AI Prototype for Digital ROSE During EBUS-TBNA and Peripheral TBNA: a Prospective Pilot Study (AI-ROSE-FEAS) (AI-ROSE-FEAS)
Preliminary Feasibility and Diagnostic Performance of an Investigational Artificial Intelligence Prototype for Digital Rapid On-Site Evaluation (ROSE) of Cytological Slides During Diagnostic Bronchoscopy With Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and Peripheral Transbronchial Needle Aspiration: a Prospective Monocentric Pilot Study (AI-ROSE-FEAS)
Rapid On-Site Evaluation (ROSE) of cytological slides obtained during EBUS-TBNA improves diagnostic yield by providing real-time adequacy assessment and preliminary diagnostic orientation after each needle pass. In centers without a dedicated cytopathologist, ROSE is performed by a second interventional pulmonologist acting as a dedicated ROSE operator (interventional pulmonologist-performed ROSE, IP-ROSE), a model associated with good but variable diagnostic performance compared to cytopathologist-performed ROSE.
This study evaluates the feasibility and preliminary diagnostic performance of an investigational artificial intelligence prototype for digital ROSE. The prototype, developed in-house by the Principal Investigator, analyzes microscopic images of Diff-Quik stained cytological slides acquired through a dedicated digital microscope, together with basic clinical data, via API calls to a multimodal AI model. It produces two outputs: sample adequacy (appropriate/not appropriate) and malignancy suspicion (benign/malignant), each with a confidence score. The AI output is recorded in the study database for research purposes only and is not shown to the operator in real time; it does not influence clinical decisions during the procedure.
The study is a prospective, monocentric, observational pilot study enrolling 65 adult patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA or peripheral TBNA with IP-ROSE at a single interventional pulmonology unit. The primary statistical unit is the individual ROSE slide, with an expected 130 to 160 evaluable slides. Co-primary endpoints are: (1) technical feasibility of the AI prototype, defined as the proportion of slides with valid AI output within 90 seconds; and (2) AI accuracy for sample adequacy assessment compared to the definitive cytopathological diagnosis, with an expected 95% confidence interval precision of ±5.5%. Secondary endpoints include AI accuracy for malignancy suspicion, agreement between the AI prototype and the IP-ROSE operator, and AI output latency.
The AI prototype is not a commercially approved or CE-marked medical device. It was developed internally by the Principal Investigator for research purposes and is evaluated exclusively within this study. Data from this pilot study will inform the design of a subsequent confirmatory non-inferiority trial, which will be the subject of separate registration and ethical approval.
Studienübersicht
Status
Status
Bedingungen
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Intervention / Behandlung
Studientyp
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Geschätzt)
Einschreibung
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienkontakt
Studienkontakt
- Name: Matilde Boccia, Medical Doctor
- Telefonnummer: +39 0817473393
- E-Mail: matilde.boccia@aocardarelli.it
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
- Erwachsene
- Älterer Erwachsener
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Probenahmeverfahren
Studienpopulation
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Clinical indication for diagnostic bronchoscopy with EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal lymphadenopathy and/or TBNA on peripheral lung lesions, according to ACCP/ERS-ESTS guidelines and the Unit's diagnostic pathways.
- The procedure will be performed in two-person mode with IP-ROSE performed as per the center's SOP.
- Ability to provide written informed consent.
- Willingness to undergo the required follow-up.
Exclusion Criteria
- Absolute contraindications to bronchoscopy.
- Known histological diagnosis of the target lesion (except re-staging).
- Concomitant interventional procedures that alter the standard sequence.
- Inability to provide written informed consent.
- Any condition that, in the investigator's judgment, compromises patient safety or the reliability of the data.
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
Anzahl der Gruppen / Kohorten
Kohorten und Interventionen
Gruppe / KohorteGruppe / Kohorte |
Intervention / BehandlungIntervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
patients with an indication for diagnostic bronchoscopy
patients with an indication for diagnostic bronchoscopy for suspected malignant disease of the lung or mediastinum or for suspected interstitial lung disease
|
Bronchologist's Rapid On Site Evaluation (ROSE) compared with those of the AI and then compared with the pathological anatomy report
Andere Namen:
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
technical feasibility of the AI prototype
Zeitfenster: 6 months
|
technical feasibility of the AI prototype, defined as the proportion of slides with valid AI output within 90 seconds
|
6 months
|
|
AI accuracy
Zeitfenster: 6 months
|
AI accuracy for sample adequacy assessment compared to the definitive cytopathological diagnosis, with an expected 95% confidence interval precision of ±5.5%
|
6 months
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
AI accuracy for malignancy suspicion
Zeitfenster: 6 months
|
AI accuracy for malignancy suspicion
|
6 months
|
|
Agreement between the AI prototype and the IP-ROSE operator
Zeitfenster: 6 months
|
Agreement between the AI prototype and the IP-ROSE operator
|
6 months
|
|
AI output latency
Zeitfenster: 6 months
|
AI output latency
|
6 months
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Sponsor
Sponsor
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)
Studienbeginn
Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)
Primärer Abschluss
Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)
Studienabschluss
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Zuerst gepostet
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes Update gepostet
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- AI-ROSE-FEAS
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .