Feasibility and Preliminary Performance of an AI Prototype for Digital ROSE During EBUS-TBNA and Peripheral TBNA: a Prospective Pilot Study (AI-ROSE-FEAS) (AI-ROSE-FEAS)

June 17, 2026 updated by: Matilde Boccia, Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale A.Cardarelli

Preliminary Feasibility and Diagnostic Performance of an Investigational Artificial Intelligence Prototype for Digital Rapid On-Site Evaluation (ROSE) of Cytological Slides During Diagnostic Bronchoscopy With Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and Peripheral Transbronchial Needle Aspiration: a Prospective Monocentric Pilot Study (AI-ROSE-FEAS)

Rapid On-Site Evaluation (ROSE) of cytological slides obtained during EBUS-TBNA improves diagnostic yield by providing real-time adequacy assessment and preliminary diagnostic orientation after each needle pass. In centers without a dedicated cytopathologist, ROSE is performed by a second interventional pulmonologist acting as a dedicated ROSE operator (interventional pulmonologist-performed ROSE, IP-ROSE), a model associated with good but variable diagnostic performance compared to cytopathologist-performed ROSE.

This study evaluates the feasibility and preliminary diagnostic performance of an investigational artificial intelligence prototype for digital ROSE. The prototype, developed in-house by the Principal Investigator, analyzes microscopic images of Diff-Quik stained cytological slides acquired through a dedicated digital microscope, together with basic clinical data, via API calls to a multimodal AI model. It produces two outputs: sample adequacy (appropriate/not appropriate) and malignancy suspicion (benign/malignant), each with a confidence score. The AI output is recorded in the study database for research purposes only and is not shown to the operator in real time; it does not influence clinical decisions during the procedure.

The study is a prospective, monocentric, observational pilot study enrolling 65 adult patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA or peripheral TBNA with IP-ROSE at a single interventional pulmonology unit. The primary statistical unit is the individual ROSE slide, with an expected 130 to 160 evaluable slides. Co-primary endpoints are: (1) technical feasibility of the AI prototype, defined as the proportion of slides with valid AI output within 90 seconds; and (2) AI accuracy for sample adequacy assessment compared to the definitive cytopathological diagnosis, with an expected 95% confidence interval precision of ±5.5%. Secondary endpoints include AI accuracy for malignancy suspicion, agreement between the AI prototype and the IP-ROSE operator, and AI output latency.

The AI prototype is not a commercially approved or CE-marked medical device. It was developed internally by the Principal Investigator for research purposes and is evaluated exclusively within this study. Data from this pilot study will inform the design of a subsequent confirmatory non-inferiority trial, which will be the subject of separate registration and ethical approval.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
65

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

patients with clinical indication for diagnostic bronchoscopy with EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal lymphadenopathy and/or TBNA on peripheral lung lesions, according to ACCP/ERS-ESTS guidelines and the Unit's diagnostic pathways.

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Clinical indication for diagnostic bronchoscopy with EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal lymphadenopathy and/or TBNA on peripheral lung lesions, according to ACCP/ERS-ESTS guidelines and the Unit's diagnostic pathways.
  • The procedure will be performed in two-person mode with IP-ROSE performed as per the center's SOP.
  • Ability to provide written informed consent.
  • Willingness to undergo the required follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Absolute contraindications to bronchoscopy.
  • Known histological diagnosis of the target lesion (except re-staging).
  • Concomitant interventional procedures that alter the standard sequence.
  • Inability to provide written informed consent.
  • Any condition that, in the investigator's judgment, compromises patient safety or the reliability of the data.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
patients with an indication for diagnostic bronchoscopy
patients with an indication for diagnostic bronchoscopy for suspected malignant disease of the lung or mediastinum or for suspected interstitial lung disease
Diagnostic test: ROSE
Bronchologist's Rapid On Site Evaluation (ROSE) compared with those of the AI and then compared with the pathological anatomy report
Other Names:
  • AI-ROSE
  • IP-ROSE

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
technical feasibility of the AI prototype
Time Frame: 6 months
technical feasibility of the AI prototype, defined as the proportion of slides with valid AI output within 90 seconds
6 months
AI accuracy
Time Frame: 6 months
AI accuracy for sample adequacy assessment compared to the definitive cytopathological diagnosis, with an expected 95% confidence interval precision of ±5.5%
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AI accuracy for malignancy suspicion
Time Frame: 6 months
AI accuracy for malignancy suspicion
6 months
Agreement between the AI prototype and the IP-ROSE operator
Time Frame: 6 months
Agreement between the AI prototype and the IP-ROSE operator
6 months
AI output latency
Time Frame: 6 months
AI output latency
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale A.Cardarelli

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 17, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 17, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 23, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 17, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AI-ROSE-FEAS

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on ROSE

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings