Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Autonomic and Immune Effects of Regional Anesthesia in Total Hip Arthroplasty (PENG neuromodu)

3. November 2026 aktualisiert von: Poznan University of Medical Sciences

Effects of Three Regional Anesthesia Strategies on Autonomic Regulation, Systemic Inflammatory Response, and Postoperative Recovery Following Elective Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Trial

Surgical trauma activates the sympathetic nervous system and induces a systemic inflammatory response, both of which may adversely affect postoperative recovery. Regional anesthesia has traditionally been used for perioperative analgesia; however, emerging evidence suggests that peripheral nerve blocks may also modulate autonomic and immune pathways. This prospective randomized double-blind trial aims to compare three regional anesthesia strategies in patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia and to determine their effects on autonomic regulation, systemic inflammatory response, postoperative pain, opioid consumption, quality of recovery, and early functional outcomes.

Studienübersicht

Status

Noch keine Rekrutierung

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with substantial surgical trauma, resulting in activation of the sympathetic nervous system and a systemic inflammatory response that may contribute to postoperative pain, delayed functional recovery, and perioperative complications. Although regional anesthesia techniques are widely used to improve postoperative analgesia, increasing evidence suggests that they may also influence autonomic regulation and neuroimmune interactions beyond their analgesic effects. The extent to which different regional anesthesia strategies modify perioperative autonomic and inflammatory responses remains incompletely understood.

This prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial aims to compare three regional analgesic strategies in patients undergoing elective primary total hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia: ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, local infiltration analgesia (LIA), and the combination of PENG block with LIA. All patients will receive standardized perioperative anesthetic and multimodal analgesic management, with the regional analgesic technique being the only study intervention.

The primary objective is to determine whether different regional anesthesia strategies differentially influence perioperative autonomic regulation and systemic inflammatory response. Autonomic function will be assessed using perioperative hemodynamic parameters and vasopressor requirements, while systemic inflammatory activation will be evaluated using routinely available inflammatory biomarkers, including the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and other laboratory markers measured before and after surgery.

Secondary objectives include comparison of postoperative pain intensity at rest and during movement, opioid consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, quality of recovery assessed using the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, time to first ambulation, length of hospital stay, patient satisfaction, and the incidence of postoperative complications.

The study is designed to determine whether combining peripheral nerve blockade with periarticular infiltration provides additive benefits not only for postoperative analgesia but also for modulation of autonomic-immune interactions and enhancement of postoperative recovery. The findings may improve understanding of peripheral nerve blocks as a form of perioperative neuromodulation and support optimization of regional anesthesia strategies in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

165

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Studienorte

      • Poznan, Polen, 62-701
        • Poznan University of Medical Sciences

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre bis 100 Jahre (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged ≥18 years.
  • Scheduled for elective primary total hip arthroplasty due to primary hip osteoarthritis.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III.
  • Planned spinal anesthesia with one of the study regional analgesia techniques.
  • Ability to understand the study procedures and provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal or inability to provide written informed consent.
  • Revision hip arthroplasty, simultaneous bilateral hip arthroplasty, or hip arthroplasty performed for an acute fracture.
  • Known hypersensitivity to ropivacaine or other medications required for the study procedures.
  • Contraindication to spinal anesthesia, PENG block, or local infiltration analgesia, including infection at the injection site or a coagulation disorder or antithrombotic treatment that precludes safe performance of the planned procedures.
  • Pre-existing neurological or neuromuscular disease that substantially affects sensation or motor function in the operated limb or prevents reliable assessment of study outcomes.
  • Cognitive impairment or a communication disorder that prevents understanding of the study procedures or reliable completion of pain assessments.
  • A medical condition that, in the investigator's judgment, makes participation or the planned anesthetic procedures unsafe.
  • Planned use of an additional regional analgesic technique outside the study protocol.
  • Participation in another interventional study that could interfere with the assessment of the study outcomes.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Vervierfachen

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: PENG Block

Ropivacaine for Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block

Ultrasound-guided single-injection pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block performed before surgery using 20ml of 0.2% ropivacaine

Andere Namen:
  • PENG
  • Perikapsuläre Nervengruppenblockade
  • 0.2% Ropimol
Experimental: Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA)

Ropivacaine for Local Infiltration Analgesia

Local infiltration analgesia is performed intraoperatively - 20ml 0.2% ropivacaine

Andere Namen:
  • Periarticular Infiltration Analgesia
  • 0.2% ropimol
Experimental: Combined PENG Block + LIA

Ropivacaine for Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block before surgery and Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA)

Ultrasound-guided single-injection pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block performed before surgery using 20ml of 0.2% ropivacaine

Andere Namen:
  • PENG
  • Perikapsuläre Nervengruppenblockade
  • 0.2% Ropimol

Local infiltration analgesia is performed intraoperatively - 20ml 0.2% ropivacaine

Andere Namen:
  • Periarticular Infiltration Analgesia
  • 0.2% ropimol

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Change in Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII)
Zeitfenster: 24 hours after surgery

Comparison of the change in Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index from baseline to postoperative 24 hours among the three study groups.

24 hours after surgery

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR)
Zeitfenster: 24 hours after surgery

Comparison of the change in neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio among the three study groups.

24 hours after surgery
Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR)
Zeitfenster: 12 hours after surgery

Comparison of the change in neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio among the three study groups.

12 hours after surgery
Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR)
Zeitfenster: 48 hours after surgery

Comparison of the change in neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio among the three study groups.

48 hours after surgery
Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR)
Zeitfenster: 24 hours after surgery

Comparison of the change in platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio among the three study groups.

24 hours after surgery
Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR)
Zeitfenster: 48 hours after surgery

Comparison of the change in platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio among the three study groups.

48 hours after surgery
Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR)
Zeitfenster: 12 hours after surgery

Comparison of the change in platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio among the three study groups.

12 hours after surgery
Postoperative pain intensity
Zeitfenster: 2 hours after surgery

Comparison of postoperative pain intensity assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0-10) at rest.

2 hours after surgery
Postoperative pain intensity at movement
Zeitfenster: 2 hours after surgery

Comparison of postoperative pain intensity assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0-10) at movement.

2 hours after surgery
Postoperative pain intensity at movement
Zeitfenster: 6 hours after surgery

Comparison of postoperative pain intensity assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0-10) at movement.

6 hours after surgery
Postoperative pain intensity at movement
Zeitfenster: 12 hours after surgery

Comparison of postoperative pain intensity assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0-10) at movement.

12 hours after surgery
Postoperative pain intensity at movement
Zeitfenster: 24 hours after surgery

Comparison of postoperative pain intensity assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0-10) at movement.

24 hours after surgery
Postoperative pain intensity at movement
Zeitfenster: 48 hours after surgery

Comparison of postoperative pain intensity assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0-10) at movement.

48 hours after surgery
Postoperative pain intensity
Zeitfenster: 6 hours after surgery

Comparison of postoperative pain intensity assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0-10) at rest.

6 hours after surgery
Postoperative pain intensity
Zeitfenster: 12 hours after surgery

Comparison of postoperative pain intensity assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0-10) at rest.

12 hours after surgery
Postoperative pain intensity
Zeitfenster: 24 hours after surgery

Comparison of postoperative pain intensity assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0-10) at rest.

24 hours after surgery
Postoperative pain intensity
Zeitfenster: 48 hours after surgery

Comparison of postoperative pain intensity assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0-10) at rest.

48 hours after surgery
Postoperative opioid consumption
Zeitfenster: 48 hours after surgery

Comparison of cumulative opioid consumption during the postoperative period, expressed as intravenous morphine milligram equivalents (MME).

48 hours after surgery
Time to first rescue analgesia
Zeitfenster: 48 hours after surgery

Comparison of the time from the end of surgery to the first administration of rescue opioid analgesia.

48 hours after surgery
Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII)
Zeitfenster: 24 hours after surgery

Comparison of the change in the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) among the three study groups.

24 hours after surgery
Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII)
Zeitfenster: 12 hours after surgery

Comparison of the change in the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) among the three study groups.

12 hours after surgery
Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII)
Zeitfenster: 48 hours after surgery

Comparison of the change in the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) among the three study groups.

48 hours after surgery
C-reactive protein (CRP)
Zeitfenster: 12 hours after surgery

Comparison of postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations among the three study groups.

12 hours after surgery
C-reactive protein (CRP)
Zeitfenster: 24 hours after surgery

Comparison of postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations among the three study groups.

24 hours after surgery
C-reactive protein (CRP)
Zeitfenster: 48 hours after surgery

Comparison of postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations among the three study groups.

48 hours after surgery

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

1. Dezember 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

30. Dezember 2027

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

1. Januar 2028

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

29. Juli 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

3. November 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

9. November 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

9. November 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

3. November 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. November 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • 18/2026

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

JA

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

De-identified individual participant data underlying the published results will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author. Data will be shared after publication of the primary study results and following approval of a methodologically sound research proposal and completion of a data sharing agreement.

IPD-Sharing-Zeitrahmen

Data will be available beginning 6 months after publication of the primary results and for a period of 5 years.

IPD-Sharing-Zugriffskriterien

Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal aimed at achieving the objectives of the approved proposal will be granted access. Requests should be directed to the corresponding author. A data access agreement will be required prior to data release.

Art der unterstützenden IPD-Freigabeinformationen

  • STUDIENPROTOKOLL
  • SAFT
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .