Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Subarachnoid Administrations of Adults Autologous Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in SCI

14. Mai 2019 aktualisiert von: Jesús Vaquero Crespo, M.D., Puerta de Hierro University Hospital

Subarachnoid Administrations of Adults Autologous Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Patients Suffering Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)

The study goes on 24 months, with recruiting, treatment and follow period for all patients. The first day for each patient will be the first cellular administration. 3 doses will be administrated every 3 months from first dose.

When the clinical trial finishes, it will be done a completed check of all obtained parameters.

Studienübersicht

Status

Abgeschlossen

Detaillierte Beschreibung

It is a clinical trial phase I, single center, non-randomized, uncontrolled, open prospective follow-up of a cohort of patients with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) .10 patients will be included with this injury.

Primary objective: Analyze the possible clinical efficacy of administration of main adult mesenchymal autologous cells expanded "in vitro" in patients with incomplete and chronically established SCI.

Secondary objectives: Confirm the safety of treatment, and study possible changes in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels (Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), nerve growth factor (NGF), ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF), Nerve Growth Factor 3 and 4(NT3 and NT4) after subarachnoid administration of BMMC.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

10

Phase

  • Phase 1

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

    • Madrid
      • Majadahonda, Madrid, Spanien, 28222
        • Hospital Puerta de Hierro

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre bis 70 Jahre (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Incomplete SCI
  2. Neurological deficit clinically stable at least 12 months prior to treatment, and with a minimum of one-year evolution after SCI.
  3. Neurophysiological confirmation of incomplete SCI.
  4. The MRI study that morphologically evaluate the SCI.
  5. Age between 18 and 70 years
  6. Thread Men and women will compromise to use anticonceptive issues from first cell´s extraction to 6 months after last cell´s administration.
  7. Ability to attend clinical follow-up and perform physical therapy through the treatment period.
  8. Written and signed informed consent, according to the local regulation.
  9. Hematologic and creatinin parameters, SGOT and SGPT, within the normal range, according to laboratory standards considering that small variations could be accepted based on clinical study team criteria.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. A classification in ASIA and FRANKEL clinical scales to evaluate the SCI.
  2. Neurophysiological records that confirm the complete SCI.
  3. Age below 18 years or above 70.
  4. Pregnancy or lactation.
  5. Malignancy disease diagnosed or treated within the last 5 years.
  6. Patients with systemic disease that represents and additional risk to treatment.
  7. Patients with uncertain commitment to follow the physical therapy and clinical visits as well as patient with a negative input in the previous phycological assessment.
  8. Inability to assess the SCI features through MRI either noise due to spinal stabilization systems or any other cause.
  9. Patients currently under hematopoietic growth factors treatment or who required or maintained anticoagulation.
  10. Neurodegenerative disease additional.
  11. History of substance abuse, psychiatric disease or allergy to the protein products used in the process of cell expansion.
  12. Positive serology for HIV and syphilis.
  13. Active Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C.
  14. With other reason that would consider the patient ineligible for cell therapy according to the investigators judgment.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: N / A
  • Interventionsmodell: Einzelgruppenzuweisung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cell
All patients will be treated with the same treatment: Adult Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cell
Diagnosed patients with incomplete spinal cord injury and chronically established SCI will be treated with Adult Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cells.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Efficacy-Sensivity Improvement Using the ASIA Score
Zeitfenster: measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after surgery
Sensitivity improvement was measured using the ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) scale to measure the Surface sensitivity (LTS), pain sensitivity (PPS), and the degree of motor function in key muscles (MS). The sum of MS, LTS, and PPS configure total ASIA score. A minimum possible score is 0 points. A maximum possible score is 224 points for a patient with normal sensation. ASIA score was obtained before surgery, and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after surgery. Mean and standard deviation for the 10 patients were obtained at all the time points and statistically analyzed.
measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after surgery
Efficacy- Changes in Functional Independence Measure Scale
Zeitfenster: measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery

- Changes in Functional Independence Measure scale (NIF scale), score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment.

Ranges score: 18 to 126. Being 18 total patient dependency and 126 total patient independence.

measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery
Efficacy-Change in Barthel Score
Zeitfenster: measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery

- Changes in Barthel score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment.

Ranges score: 0 to 100. Being 0 total patient dependency and 100 total patient independence.

measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery
Efficacy-IANC-SCIFRS Scale
Zeitfenster: Changes in IANC-SCIFRS scale before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)

-Changes in IANC-SCIFRS scale

Ranges score: 0 to 48. Being 0 severe degree of disability and 48 normal value.

Changes in IANC-SCIFRS scale before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)
Efficacy-Changes in PENN Score.
Zeitfenster: measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery

- Changes in PENN score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment

Ranges score: 0 to 4. Being 0 absence of spasms and 4 frequency greater than 10 spasms per hour.

measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery
Changes in ASHWORTH Score
Zeitfenster: measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery

- Changes in ASHWORTH score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment

Ranges score: 0 to 4. Being 0 when there isn´t increase in muscle tone when stretching, and 4 when there is rigid affected follow-up in flexion or extension

measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery
Efficacy-Changes in EVA Score
Zeitfenster: measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery

• Changes in EVA score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment

Ranges score: 0 to 10. Being 0 absence of pain and 10 the worst pain.

measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery
Efficacy- Changes in Geffner Score
Zeitfenster: Changes in Geffner scale before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)

changes in Geffner score before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)

Ranges score: 0 to 6. Being 0 absence of bladder control and 6 total control of bladder

Changes in Geffner scale before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)
Efficacy- Changes in NBD Score
Zeitfenster: measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery

changes in NBD score before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)

Ranges score: 0 to 47. 0-6 is very minor dysfunction. 7-9 is minor dysfunction. 10-13 is moderate dysfunction; and 14 or more is severe dysfunction.

measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery
Efficacy-Changes in the Neurophysiological Parameters (SSEPs, Somatosensory Evoked Potentials)
Zeitfenster: Efficacy-measure before treatment (baseline visit), 6, and 12 months after surgery
Changes in the neurophysiological parameters (SSEPs, somatosensory evoked potentials) measured as the number of patients that improved along the study.
Efficacy-measure before treatment (baseline visit), 6, and 12 months after surgery
Efficacy-Urodynammic in Terms of Detrusor Pressure
Zeitfenster: Urodynamic studies before surgery, and at 6 and 12 months after surgery (follow-up
Urodynamic studies in terms of detrusor pressure (decrease on detrusor pressure is considered a clinical improvement)
Urodynamic studies before surgery, and at 6 and 12 months after surgery (follow-up
Efficacy-Urodynamic Studies Bladder Compliance
Zeitfenster: measure before treatment (baseline visit), 6 and 12 months after surgery

Urodynamic studies in terms of Bladder compliance. Bladder compliance is the result of a mathematical calculation of volume responsible for 1 cm H2O pressure rise measured during a cystometric filling

. It gives an indication on how the different mechanisms in the bladder wall react on stretching.

It is obvious that compliance figures can vary widely in groups which makes it difficult to define limits of normality.

measure before treatment (baseline visit), 6 and 12 months after surgery
Efficacy-Urodynamic Studies Maximum Cystometric Capacity
Zeitfenster: Urodynamic studies before surgery, and at 6 and 12 months after surgery (follow-up
Urodynamic studies in terms of Maximum cystometric capacity
Urodynamic studies before surgery, and at 6 and 12 months after surgery (follow-up
Efficacy-modification of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Zeitfenster: before (baseline visit) and at 12 months
Number of patients with changes in morphology of injury compared with basal images
before (baseline visit) and at 12 months

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Number of Adverse Events .
Zeitfenster: Up to 12 months
- The safety will be valued with number of adverse events related with administration of subarachnoid autologous Bone Marrow Expanded Mesenchymal Cells in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury (SCI).
Up to 12 months
Efficacy- Expression of Neurotrophins in CSF (CerebroSpinal Fluid) Samples
Zeitfenster: Basal and 10 months after the administration
Changes in expression of neurotrophins in CSF (CerebroSpinal Fluid) samples obtained previously to first administration of cell therapy, and previously to the last administration, at month 10, in order to study the variability in the expression of neurotrophins along time. The mean+SD (standard deviation) at each time point was obtained. The tested neurotrophins were: BDNF.
Basal and 10 months after the administration

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Jesús JV Vaquero Crespo, M.D., Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn

1. Mai 2014

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. Mai 2016

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. Mai 2016

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

6. Mai 2014

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

12. Juni 2014

Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)

18. Juni 2014

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

19. Juli 2019

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

14. Mai 2019

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Mai 2019

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

Ja

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

Anonymized individual data of participants will be shared with Authorities at the end of the Clinical development plan by the CTD (Common Technical Document). Results will be published in a scientific publication

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Rückenmarksverletzung

3
Abonnieren