- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04229420
Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Bilateral Rectus Sheath Block in Adults Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery
Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Bilateral Rectus Sheath Block in Adults Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery: a Randomized Comparative Study.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Introduction:
Regional anesthesia is a key component of opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia after major abdominal surgery as it improves recovery such as return of bowel function and early ambulation. Continuous epidural local anesthetic infusion is a common analgesic technique but comes with the side effect of hypotension and potential leg weakness and rarely, epidural abscess or hematoma. The rectus sheath block (RSB) has been used for postoperative analgesia in surgical procedures involving a vertical midline laparotomy incision as well as for laparoscopic procedures. In this block the ventral rami of the seventh intercostal nerve up to the subcostal nerve, which supply the rectus abdominis muscle and overlying skin, are blocked.
Recently, the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has gained wide attention due to its simplicity and potential uses in truncal procedures. This paraspinal plane block is performed by injecting local anesthetic between the erector spinae muscles and transverse processes and is thought to work by blocking the dorsal and ventral rami of the thoracic spinal nerves. Injections at various thoracic levels have been described in case reports with satisfactory postoperative analgesia for breast, thoracic and abdominal procedures. Comparison of post-operative pain management of both erector spinae plane block and rectus sheath block in adults undergoing major abdominal surgery for has not been investigated before.
Hypothesis:
It is hypothesized that ESPB is more effective in postoperative analgesia following major abdominal surgeries with minimal motor affection and postoperative morphine consumption compared to RSB block.
2. Study Protocol:
On arrival of the patients to anesthesia room, patients will be secured with 20-gauge intravenous cannula and will receive midazolam 0.02mg/kg intravenous (IV), ondansetron (4 mg slowly IV).
Monitoring will include ECG, non-invasive arterial blood pressure, and pulse oximetry (SpO2).
All patients will receive a standardized anesthetic technique for induction with 2mcg/kg fentanyl, 2-3 mg/kg propofol, and 0.5 mg/kg atracurium. Mechanical ventilation will be adjusted to maintain an end tidal CO2 between (30 - 40 mmHg). Maintenance will be achieved with oxygen/air with isoflurane 1.2% and atracurium infusion at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg/h.
Following induction of anesthesia patients will be divided into two equal groups; Group 1 will receive pre-incisional ultrasound (US)-guided Bilateral RSB blocks using 20-ml volume of bupivacaine 0.25% for each side, and group 2 will receive pre-incisional ultrasound (US)-guided Bilateral ESPB using 20-ml volume of bupivacaine 0.25% for each side.
Group 1(RSB):
After preparing the skin with povidone iodine, a high frequency (5-10 MHz) ultrasound probe (S-NerveTM; SonoSite Inc., Bothell, WA, USA) will be placed in a longitudinal orientation above the level of the umbilicus with the Patient in the supine position. After identifying the rectus abdominis muscle, A 22 G echogenic needle using the in plane technique will be inserted just below the costal margin at an angle of approximately 45 degrees to the skin, then, a total of 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected into the plane between the rectus muscle and posterior rectus sheath. Negative aspiration will be confirmed every 5 ml. The block will then be repeated on the other side.
Group 2 (ESPB):
After induction of anesthesia; the patient will be positioned on the lateral position. The skin will be prepared with povidone iodine, and a high frequency (5-10 MHz) ultrasound probe (S-NerveTM; SonoSite Inc., Bothell, WA, USA) will be placed in a transverse orientation on the T9 spinous process which will be located by palpating and counting down from the C7 spinous process. The tip of the T9 transverse process will be identified and centred on the ultrasound screen, the probe will then be rotated into a longitudinal orientation to produce a parasagittal view, visible superficial to the acoustic shadows of the transverse processes: skin and subcutaneous tissue; trapezius; and erector spinae muscle .Correct location of the needle tip in the fascial plane deep to erector spinae muscle is confirmed by injecting 0.5-1 ml saline and seeing the fluid lifting the erector spinae muscle off the transverse process while not distending the muscle. A total of 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will then be injected into the ESP of both sides. Negative aspiration will be confirmed every 5 ml].
Postoperative pain management:
Postoperatively, patients will receive 1 g paracetamol every 6 h and 30 mg ketorolac every 12 h.
If the visual analogue scale (VAS) is ≥ 4, a morphine increment (2-3 mg) IV that could be repeated every 5 minutes with a maximum dose of 15 mg per 4 hours or 45 mg per 24 hours will be added to maintain a resting VAS at <4 and the total 24 hours morphine consumption will be recorded.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cairo, Egypt, 11559
- Kasralainy
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- ASA physical status I-II. Age: 18 to 60 years. Undergoing midline vertical laparotomy incisions (open colorectal resections or major ventral hernia repair).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Refusal of patients.
- Patients with coagulation disorders (Platelets ≤ 50,000 and/or INR> 1.5).
- History of allergic reactions to local anesthetics.
- Rash or signs of infection at the injection site.
- Emergency surgery.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Rectus sheath block group (RSB)
After preparing the skin, a high frequency (5-10 MHz) ultrasound probe will be placed in a longitudinal orientation above the level of the umbilicus with the Patient in the supine position.
After identifying the rectus abdominis muscle, A 22 G echogenic needle using the in plane technique will be inserted just below the costal margin then, a total of 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected into the plane between the rectus muscle and posterior rectus sheath.
Negative aspiration will be confirmed every 5 ml.
The block will then be repeated on the other side.
|
Ultrasound guided Rectus sheath block vs Erector spinae plane block
|
Active Comparator: Erector spinae plane block group (ESPB)
After induction of anesthesia; the patient will be positioned on the lateral position.
The skin will be prepared with povidone iodine, and a high frequency (5-10 MHz) ultrasound probewill be placed in a transverse orientation on the T9 spinous process which will be located by palpating and counting down from the C7 spinous process.
The tip of the T9 transverse process will be identified and centred on the ultrasound screen, the probe will then be rotated into a longitudinal orientation to produce a parasagittal view.
Correct location of the needle tip in the fascial plane deep to erector spinae muscle is confirmed by injecting 0.5-1 ml saline and seeing the fluid lifting the erector spinae muscle off the transverse process while not distending the muscle.
A total of 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will then be injected into the ESP of both sides.
|
Ultrasound guided Rectus sheath block vs Erector spinae plane block
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Time to first request of postoperative rescue analgesics
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
the time interval between the block performance and the first request to postoperative analgesia and or VAS ≥ 4
|
24 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Visual analogue score at rest (static), and on movement or coughing (dynamic)
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Visual analogue score at rest (static), and on movement or coughing (dynamic) at 30 and 60 minutes in the PACU then every 6 hours in the ward for 24 hours. The visual analogue score is a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal (HVAS) or vertical (VVAS) line, usually 10 centimeters (100 mm) in length. For pain intensity, the scale is most commonly anchored by "no pain" (score of 0) and "pain as bad as it could be" or "worst imaginable pain" (score of 100 [100-mm scale]) |
24 hours
|
Total consumption of morphine
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
total postoperative morphine consumption
|
24 hours
|
Incidence of perioperative complications.
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Incidence of perioperative complications(lower limb weakness, hematoma, viscus injury, intravascular injection and PONV
|
24 hours
|
Block performance time in min
Time Frame: procedure (time from probe contact with skin till needle withdrawal)
|
time from probe contact with skin till needle withdrawal.
|
procedure (time from probe contact with skin till needle withdrawal)
|
Failure rate of the block
Time Frame: 1st postoperative hour
|
will be calculated, where the block will be considered a failed block if the patient required more than two doses of rescue analgesia in the first hour postoperatively.
|
1st postoperative hour
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Khaled Sarhan, MD, Lecturer of anesthesia, Cairo university
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- MD-33-2019
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pain
-
Flowonix MedicalApproved for marketingBack Pain | Leg Pain | Trunk Pain | Intractable Pain | Arm Pain
-
University Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinZealand University Hospital; European Regional Development Fund; Design School...CompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | Pain Measurement | Pain, CancerGermany
-
Universitat Jaume ICompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | OncologySpain
-
University of Campinas, BrazilCompletedPREGNANCY | LUMBAR BACK PAIN | PELVIC PAIN
-
Dow University of Health SciencesRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Pain, Chronic | Pain, Back | Lower Back Pain Chronic | CLBP - Chronic Low Back PainPakistan
-
Dr. Negrin University HospitalCompletedPostoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, ChronicSpain
-
George Washington UniversityRecruitingCervical Fusion | Pain, Back | Pain, Neck | Myofacial PainUnited States
-
Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training...RecruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, Chronic | VATSTurkey
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCCompletedPain, Radiating | Pain, Burning | Pain, Crushing | Pain, Migratory | Pain, SplittingUnited States, France, Spain, Poland, Portugal
-
susanne beckerSNSFCompletedLow Back Pain | Pain, Acute | Pain, ChronicSwitzerland
Clinical Trials on Ultrasound guided Rectus sheath block vs Erector spinae plane block
-
Damanhour Teaching HospitalRecruiting
-
Asan Medical CenterCompletedVisceral Pain, PostoperativeKorea, Republic of
-
Abd-Elazeem Abd-Elhameed ElbakryActive, not recruiting
-
Assiut UniversityUnknownPain, Postoperative | Pulmonary Atelectasis | MastectomyEgypt
-
Mater Misericordiae University HospitalUnknown
-
ZhangyiNot yet recruitingNerve Block | Laparoscopic HepatectomyChina
-
Fudan UniversityCompletedPostoperative Pain | Erector Spinae Plane Block | Mammary CancerChina
-
Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute...Not yet recruiting
-
Tanta UniversityCompletedEfficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Lower Limb Surgery in PediatricEgypt
-
Tanta UniversityRecruiting