Horizontal vs Vertical Scleral Tunnels in Flanged IOL Fixation (HORVER)
Horizontal Versus Vertical Scleral Tunnel Orientation in Flanged Intrascleral Fixation: A 2-Year Comparative Study
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Estado
Condiciones
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
Background: The management of aphakia, crystalline lens luxation, and intraocular lens (IOL) luxation in the absence of adequate capsular support remains challenging. Traditional surgical options include anterior chamber IOLs, iris-fixated IOLs, and scleral-sutured posterior chamber IOLs, each carrying significant long-term risks. In 2017, Yamane and colleagues introduced a sutureless flanged intrascleral IOL fixation technique that rapidly gained worldwide acceptance. A critical yet under-investigated surgical variable is the orientation of the scleral tunnels relative to the limbus. Some surgeons create tunnels parallel to the limbus (horizontal/tangential), others perpendicular (vertical/radial), based on personal preference rather than high-level evidence.
Objective: To evaluate whether horizontal versus vertical scleral tunnel orientation is associated with differing 2-year outcomes in flanged intrascleral IOL fixation.
Study Design: This is a retrospective observational cohort study conducted at a single tertiary referral centre.
Participants: A total of 107 eyes (43 vertical tunnels, 64 horizontal tunnels) with complete 24-month follow-up are included. Surgeries are performed by two experienced vitreoretinal surgeons.
Interventions: All procedures follow the original Yamane flanged intrascleral fixation method with intentional variation in tunnel orientation only. The horizontal tunnel group receives tunnels parallel to the limbus (tangential), while the vertical tunnel group receives tunnels perpendicular to the limbus (radial). A three-piece foldable acrylic IOL (Alcon AcrySof MA60AC) is used in all eyes.
Outcome Measures: The primary outcome is the proportion of eyes achieving mean absolute error (MAE) within ±0.50D of target refraction at 2 years. Secondary outcomes include MAE at 2 years, IOL tilt measured using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), iris capture, conjunctival erosion, cystoid macular oedema, epiretinal membrane, retinal detachment, vitreous haemorrhage, hypotony, corneal oedema, early IOP elevation, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and vector astigmatism analysis using the Alpins method.
Statistical Analysis: Propensity score matching (1:1) will be performed to address selection bias. Multivariate logistic regression and a multilevel mixed-effects model with surgeon as random effect will be used to adjust for confounders including surgical period, age, and baseline refraction. For the primary outcome, a single pre-specified comparison will be made with a two-tailed significance level of α = 0.05. For secondary outcomes, the False Discovery Rate (FDR) using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure (q = 0.05) will be applied to control for Type I error inflation.
Timeline: Data were collected from patients who underwent surgery between March 1, 2022, and March 1, 2025. Minimum follow-up is 24 months, with final data collection completed in March 2025.
Tipo de estudio
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Actual)
Inscripción
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
-
Van, Turquía (Türkiye), 65000
- SBU Van Training and Research Hospital
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
- Adulto
- Adulto Mayor
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Método de muestreo
Población de estudio
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Complicated aphakia defined as absence of adequate capsular support following cataract extraction, lens trauma, or previous lensectomy
- Crystalline lens luxation defined as partial or complete displacement of the natural lens due to zonular weakness
- Intraocular lens (IOL) luxation defined as partial or complete dislocation of a previously implanted IOL
- Inadequate capsular support (<180° of intact zonular or capsular support)
- Ability to complete scheduled follow-up visits
- Complete follow-up data available
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous scleral buckling surgery within 6 months
- Pars plana vitrectomy within 3 months
- Active uveitis
- Active endophthalmitis
- Uncontrolled scleritis or scleral thinning
- Corneal decompensation (endothelial cell density <1000 cells/mm²)
- Uncontrolled glaucoma (IOP >25 mmHg despite maximum therapy)
- History of penetrating keratoplasty, DALK, DSEK, or DMEK
- History of corneal refractive surgery
- Active proliferative diabetic retinopathy
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Inability to complete 24-month follow-up
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
Número de grupos/cohortes
Cohortes e Intervenciones
Grupo / CohorteGrupo / Cohorte |
Intervención / TratamientoIntervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Vertical Scleral Tunnel Group
Patients who underwent flanged intrascleral IOL fixation with scleral tunnels created perpendicular to the limbus (radial/vertical orientation).
|
Sutureless flanged intrascleral fixation of a three-piece foldable acrylic IOL (Alcon AcrySof MA60AC).
Two partial-thickness scleral tunnels are created 2.0 mm posterior to the limbus, 180° apart.
Haptics are externalized through the tunnels, and a flange is created on each haptic tip using thermal cautery.
Tunnel orientation varied intentionally: horizontal (parallel to limbus) or vertical (perpendicular to limbus).
|
|
Horizontal Scleral Tunnel Group
Patients who underwent flanged intrascleral IOL fixation with scleral tunnels created parallel to the limbus (tangential/horizontal orientation).
|
Sutureless flanged intrascleral fixation of a three-piece foldable acrylic IOL (Alcon AcrySof MA60AC).
Two partial-thickness scleral tunnels are created 2.0 mm posterior to the limbus, 180° apart.
Haptics are externalized through the tunnels, and a flange is created on each haptic tip using thermal cautery.
Tunnel orientation varied intentionally: horizontal (parallel to limbus) or vertical (perpendicular to limbus).
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Eyes Achieving Mean Absolute Error (MAE) Within ±0.50 Diopters of Target Refraction
Periodo de tiempo: 24 Months
|
The proportion of eyes achieving mean absolute error (MAE) within ±0.50 diopters of the target spherical equivalent refraction at 24 months postoperatively.
|
24 Months
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Absolute Error (MAE) at 2 Years
Periodo de tiempo: 24 Months
|
Mean absolute error in spherical equivalent refraction at 24 months postoperatively.
|
24 Months
|
|
IOL Tilt Angle
Periodo de tiempo: 24 Months
|
Intraocular lens tilt angle measured using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) at 24 months postoperatively.
|
24 Months
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Patrocinador
Publicaciones y enlaces útiles
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
Inicio del estudio
Finalización primaria (Actual)
Finalización primaria
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
Finalización del estudio
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
Publicado por primera vez
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización publicada
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Otros números de identificación del estudio
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- GOKAEK-2024-04-02 (Otro identificador: Van Training and Research Hospital Ethics Committee)
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
Descripción del plan IPD
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .