Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Virtual Reality-based Perceptual Learning Therapy for Visually Impaired Population

4 de septiembre de 2026 actualizado por: Centre for Eye and Vision Research

Virtual Reality-based Perceptual Learning Therapy for Visually Impaired Population: Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial

Visual impairments significantly impact individuals' activities of daily living (ADL) and quality of life (QoL). While perceptual learning (PL) has shown promise in vision rehabilitation, traditional PL usually involves a protracted training process, and its training effects may sometimes lack ecological validity. This study protocol outlines a two-arm, single-blind, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of an innovative virtual reality (VR)-based PL therapy integrated with machine learning algorithms. Twenty participants with visual field deficits will be recruited and randomized in a 1:1 ratio into either the VR training group or a no-intervention control group. The intervention consists of six visits (1-7 days apart), each involving two training tasks (20 - 30 minutes per task). The VR training task is an Ecological Multiple Object Tracking task and a Dual task. Training stimuli are personalized to target each participant's transition zone (1~20 dB) based on the result of clinical visual field test. A Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) framework, specifically the Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) algorithm, is utilized as an adaptive controller to dynamically modulate task difficulty and maintain participants in an optimal cognitive "flow state". The primary outcome is visual field area improvement (measured by Humphrey Field Analyzer). Secondary outcomes include pre- and post-intervention assessments of visual search, balance ability, fear of falling, ADL, and QoL. It is hypothesized that participants in the VR training group will obtain improvements in primary and secondary outcomes.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Aún no reclutando

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

20

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

  • Nombre: Ke Zhang
  • Número de teléfono: 852+53748502
  • Correo electrónico: ke.zhang@cevr.hk

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Units 901-903, 9/F, Building 17W, 17 Science Park West Avenue, Hong Kong Science Park, Pak Shek Kok, Shatin
        • Contacto:
          • Ke Zhang
          • Número de teléfono: 852+53748502
          • Correo electrónico: ke.zhang@cevr.hk

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Humphrey visual field analyzer (HFA) visual field loss (mean deviation of ≤-6 dB)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Comprehension disorder that does not allow understanding of tests or training (e.g., in severe aphasia)
  • Currently under other PL treatment

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Doble

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Virtual Reality-based Perceptual Learning Training

Prior to the training session, participants' visual fields will be assessed using standard automated perimetry (e.g., Humphrey Field Analyzer, 30-2 or 24-2 grid). Based on the decibel (dB) sensitivity maps from the clinical results, each participant's visual field will be classified into three functional zones: the intact zone (normal sensitivity), the absolute blind zone (<0 dB), and the transition zone or "gray area" (1~20 dB; relative scotoma characterized by reduced but present sensitivity).

One training session will be 20 ~30 minutes for each task. Participants will be asked to complete a total of 6 training sessions. In each training session, the participant will be asked to complete two tasks (i.e., ecological multiple object tracking task and dual task) which will take approximately one hour. Training sessions will be spaced at intervals of 1~7 days.

Sin intervención: No-intervention Control

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Visual Area Improvement
Periodo de tiempo: Within one week after the training ends
Primary outcome is the visual area measured using the HVF (24-2, SITA-standard), where sensitivity increased by 6 dB or more relative to baseline in the defective hemifield or whole field.
Within one week after the training ends

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Pre/post-intervention assessments of visual search
Periodo de tiempo: Within one week after the training ends
Visual search: Perceptual processing efficiency will be assessed using a visual search task - spatial configuration search task (Wolfe et al., 2010). In this task, participants were instructed to fixate on the centre of the screen and to locate a target. Each trial began with a short tone, followed after 500 ms by a search display. Participants pressed a key to report whether the target was present (in 50% of trials) or absent, responding as quickly and accurately as possible. Feedback-indicating response correctness-appeared for 500 ms after each trial. Trials were separated by a 1000-ms inter-trial interval. Set size was systematically varied across two conditions-6 items (1 target + 5 distractors) and 18 items (1 target + 17 distractors)-to quantify search efficiency. For each participant, reaction time (RT) was regressed on set size, and the resulting slope served as the primary index of perceptual processing efficiency: shallower slopes indicate higher efficiency.
Within one week after the training ends
Pre/post-intervention assessments of balance ability
Periodo de tiempo: Within one week after the training ends
Balance: The Bertec Balance Advantage™ system is used to assess participants' balance before and after training. During the test, participants are asked to stand under different challenging conditions. Balance-challenging conditions include (1) standing on a firm or foam surface (Fi/Fo); (2) standing surface with backward or forward translation (BT/FT); and (3) standing with their eyes close (EC). Outcome measures, including root mean square sway of the center of pressure in the anterior - posterior and medial -lateral directions (mm/s), total sway path length (mm), and maximum CoP displacement in the AP and ML directions (mm)
Within one week after the training ends
Pre/post-intervention assessments of fear of fall
Periodo de tiempo: Within one week after the training ends
Fear of fall: The English & Chinese version of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) is a validated and reliable questionnaire used to assess fear of falling in everyday life. The FES-I total score ranges from 16 to 64. Higher scores indicate greater concern about falling and therefore a worse outcome.
Within one week after the training ends
Pre/post-intervention assessments of quality of life (a)
Periodo de tiempo: Within one week after the training ends
The National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25), English and Chinese versions. The NEI VFQ-25 scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better visual functioning and better vision-related quality of life and therefore represent a better outcome.
Within one week after the training ends
Pre/post-intervention assessments of quality of life (b)
Periodo de tiempo: Within one week after the training ends
The Chinese version of the Low Vision Quality of Life Questionnaire (CLVQOL) is used to assess vision-related quality of life. The CLVQOL contains 25 items, each scored from 0 to 5, resulting in a theoretical total score ranging from 0 to 125. Higher scores indicate fewer vision-related difficulties and better vision-related quality of life and therefore represent a better outcome.
Within one week after the training ends

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Colaboradores

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

1 de octubre de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

1 de octubre de 2028

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

1 de enero de 2029

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

31 de agosto de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

4 de septiembre de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

9 de septiembre de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

9 de septiembre de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

4 de septiembre de 2026

Última verificación

1 de septiembre de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • CEVR-PL-20260831

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

SÍ

Marco de tiempo para compartir IPD

After the publication of the study results, for an indefinite period.

Criterios de acceso compartido de IPD

Upon reasonable request and with approval from the study's principal investigator.

Tipo de información de apoyo para compartir IPD

  • PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDIO
  • SAVIA

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .