Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Pilot Study of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)

28 de abril de 2020 actualizado por: NYU Langone Health
This study will test the tolerability and preliminary efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with a cognitive training program, remotely-delivered using a telemedicine protocol in 60 adults with multiple sclerosis (MS). The study will evaluate the efficacy of tDCS to evaluate two of the most debilitating symptoms of MS: cognitive impairment and fatigue.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been demonstrated to:

  1. successfully treat fatigue in adults with MS, and
  2. improve learning ability and other aspects of cognitive functioning in healthy controls and in participants with a range of medical disorders.

Cognitive impairment in MS remains a major treatment challenge and a trial of tDCS combined with a cognitive training program to treat MS-related cognitive impairment is warranted. However, one barrier for the study of tDCS has been the need for the participant to travel to the study site for each tDCS administration. To address this issue, the biomedical company Soterix, has recently designed a remote-delivery tDCS device designed for use in clinical trials. Therefore, the primary goal of this study is to establish a protocol for remotely-supervised in-home tDCS delivery for studies with MS participants. Established safety and feasibility of remotely-supervised tDCS delivery will facilitate the next steps of larger controlled trials, in both MS as well as other conditions, to determine efficacy and appropriate real-world use.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

31

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • New York
      • New York, New York, Estados Unidos, 10016
        • New York University Langone Medical Center

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años a 70 años (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ages 18-70
  • Definite MS diagnosis, all subtypes [95]
  • MS-related changes in cognitive functioning
  • A score of 6.5 or lesson the Expanded
  • Disability Status Scale (EDSS) OR more than 6.5 with proxy
  • Has stable and continuous access to internet service at home compatible with the study laptop (Wi-Fi or ethernet cable)
  • Adequate internet capacity for remote monitoring, as tested by http://www.speedtest.net/)
  • Adequate home facilities (enough space, access to quiet and distraction free area)
  • Able to commit to the two-week period of training sessions with baseline and follow-up visits.
  • Able to understand the informed consent process and provide consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Visual, auditory and motor deficits that would prevent full ability to understand study instructions or operate the tDCS device or study laptop, as judged by treating neurologist or study staff
  • Relapse or steroid use in previous month
  • History of mental retardation, pervasive developmental disorder or other neurological condition associated with cognitive impairment
  • Primary psychiatric disorder that would influence ability to participate
  • History of seizures or seizure disorder
  • Current chronic headaches or migraines. In addition, if a subject has had a change in the rate or severity of head pressure, headache, or migraine in the past two weeks, they are excluded.
  • History of head trauma (e.g., head injury, brain surgery) or medical device implanted in the head (such as Deep Brain Stimulator) or in the neck (such as a Vagus Nerve Stimulator)
  • Any skin disorder/sensitive skin (e.g., eczema, severe rashes), blisters, open wounds, burn including sunburns, cuts or irritation, or other skin defects which compromise the integrity of the skin at or near stimulation locations (where electrodes are placed)
  • Treatment for a communicable skin disorder currently or over the past 12 months

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Doble

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Comparador activo: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
tDCS is a therapeutic development that utilizes low amplitude direct currents to induce changes in cortical excitability. tDCS is expected to produce neuronal polarization of less than one mV (millivolt) 9. tDCS produces relatively diffuse current flow, as demonstrated by imaging studies and computational models
Otros nombres:
  • Mini CT Soterix 1x1 tDCS
Comparador falso: Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
During a sham session, the device is programmed to ramp up to the desired intensity (target 2.0 mA) and ramp down for the initial 60 seconds, with no current delivery during the session, and then again at the end of the session. These brief periods of stimulation serve to mimic the effects of a true stimulation session.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
The Number of Participants Completing at Least 80% of the Targeted Sessions.
Periodo de tiempo: Four Weeks
80% is equivalent to n=16 of the targeted 20 transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) or sham tDCS sessions.
Four Weeks
Change in Total Score of the Brief International Assessment of Cognition in MS (BICAMS)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, Four Weeks

BICAMS comprises two tests, the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) and the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R).

Scoring for SDMT involves summing the number of correct substitutions within the 90 second interval (max = 110. The higher the score, the better).

Visual/spatial memory is assessed in BICAMS using the BVMTR. In this test, six abstract designs are presented for 10 sec. The display is removed from view and patients render the stimuli via pencil on paper manual responses. Each design receives from 0 to 2 points representing accuracy and location. Thus, scores range from 0 to 12 (the higher the score, the better).

The total score range for BICAMS is 0-122. The higher the score, the better.

Baseline, Four Weeks

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Change in Score on Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 4 Weeks
MFIS consists of 21 statements. The number that best indicates how often fatigue has affected the participant in the manner described during the past 4 weeks is circled. Answer choices include: 0 - never, 1 - rarely, 2 - sometimes, 3 - often, 4 - almost always. The total score ranges from 0 to 84. The higher the number, the more frequently fatigue impacted the participant during the past 4 weeks.
Baseline, 4 Weeks
Change in Score of CogState Brief Battery (CBB)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 4 Week
CBB is a brief, computer-administered cognitive test battery that requires approximately 10 minutes for administration. If the CBB score falls between -10 to +10, it is considered normal. CogState scoring is such that 0 could be considered as performing in the average range for that subtest compared to people of similar age. A negative score means that the performance was lower than average, and a positive score means the performance was higher than average. Higher positive scores (for instance 0.2 becoming 0.5) may indicate slightly better performance and higher negative scores (for instance, -0.4 becoming -0.8) may indicate slightly worsening performance.
Baseline, 4 Week

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Colaboradores

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Leigh Charvet, NYU Langone Medical Center

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

1 de abril de 2016

Finalización primaria (Actual)

30 de septiembre de 2018

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

30 de septiembre de 2018

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

4 de abril de 2016

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

20 de abril de 2016

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

21 de abril de 2016

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

8 de mayo de 2020

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

28 de abril de 2020

Última verificación

1 de abril de 2020

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

producto fabricado y exportado desde los EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Ensayos clínicos sobre Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)

3
Suscribir