Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Iliac Crest harvest-is it Beneficial?

20 de diciembre de 2016 actualizado por: Dr. Vigil Peter, Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute

Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Supplementation During Iliac Crest Bone Graft Harvest - Its Influence on Postoperative Parameters

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a supplemental Transversus Abdominis Plane block administered intraoperatively improves the postoperative parameters in patients undergoing Alveolar bone grafting with iliac crest harvest. It also aims to find out if there is a decrease in the incidence of chronic pain or numbness at the harvest site.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

This study is a prospective, randomised, parallel group, single - centre trial evaluating the postoperative parameters in patients receiving supplemental Transversus Abdominis Plane block for anterior iliac crest harvest. It was conducted in 143 patients undergoing Alveolar bone grafting with iliac crest bone graft.

Methodology:

Informed consent and approval of local ethics and research committee in Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute, Thrissur, India was obtained prior to initiation of the study. A pilot study was done to determine the efficacy of the additional TAP block. The results showed that the intervention improved patient analgesia and reduced the requirement for rescue analgesics. A minimum sample size of 65 patients was calculated for each group to obtain a power of 80% and confidence interval of 95%. 143 patients aged between 7 and 22 years posted for Alveolar bone grafting with anterior iliac crest harvest were assessed in the study. Only those undergoing Alveolar bone grafting as a part of the reconstructive procedure for cleft lip and palate were considered for the study. The patients who had difficulty in mentation and communication,bleeding disorders, hepatic problems, infection of the abdominal wall, renal dysfunction as well as allergy to the local anaesthetic were excluded from the study. Patients undergoing revision surgeries were also excluded from the study. All the candidates were randomly alloted to either of the two groups, using a computer - generated number.

All the patients were premedicated with Midazolam 0.15mg kg-1 and Glycopyrolate 0.01mg kg-1 Anaesthesia was induced with Propofol 2 mg kg -1 and Fentanyl 2 mcg kg-1 .Vecuronium 0.1 mg kg-1 was given to facilitate orotracheal intubation with a cuffed tube.Anaesthesia was maintained with oxygen, nitrous oxide and sevoflurane. Prior to incision, all the patients were given wound infiltration with 0.75 ml kg-1 of 0.2% Ropivacaine at the graft harvest site. Those in group A received an additional ultrasound guided Transversus Abdominis Plane block with a similar volume and concentration of Ropivacaine.

At the end of the surgical procedure, the patients were extubated awake, after giving I / V Neostigmine 0.05 mg kg-1. Just prior to extubation, I/V Tramadol 0.5 mg kg-1 was given for the pain in the postoperative period. In the recovery room, the pain and emergence delirium were assessed by an independent observer every ten minutes during the first postoperative hour.These were evaluated using the FLACC Behavioural Pain Assessment Scale and WATCHA Scale respectively. They were subsequently shifted to the postoperative ward.

The next time point of assessment was 24 hours post - surgery, when the patient's pain and ambulatory status were evaluated. The pain was ranked using the five - point verbal ranking score. It was ranked as no pain, light pain, moderate pain, severe pain and intolerable pain, with a score of 0,1,2,3 and 4 respectively. The total number of rescue analgesics demanded by the patient on the first postoperative day was noted.Ambulatory status was graded using one - day Cumulated Ambulatory Score.

The patients were followed up and questioned at six weeks and twelve weeks post operatively for the presence of chronic pain, numbness or wound healing problems at the harvest site.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

143

Fase

  • No aplica

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

4 años a 22 años (Niño, Adulto)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must undergo alveolar bone grafting as a part of the reconstructive procedure for cleft lip and palate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Revision procedure
  • History of difficulty in mentation and communication
  • Bleeding disorders, hepatic problems or renal dysfunction
  • Allergy to local anaesthetic
  • Presence of infection of anterior abdominal wall

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Doble

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Local Infiltration with TAP block
Ultrasound guided Transversus Abdominis Plane block is administered intraoperatively using 0.2% Ropivacaine.
Local infiltration of the iliac crest harvest site along with TAP block using 0.2 % Ropivacaine is done
Experimental: Local Infiltration only
Local Infiltration with 0.2% Ropivacaine.
Only local infiltration with 0.2% Ropivacaine of the iliac crest harvest site is done.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Mean pain scores
Periodo de tiempo: First hour after extubation
Mean pain scores were assessed using the FLACC Behavioural Pain Assessment Scale,
First hour after extubation
Emergence delirium
Periodo de tiempo: First hour after extubation
Emergence delirium was assessed using WATCHA Scale during the first hour after extubation
First hour after extubation
Pain scores
Periodo de tiempo: 24 hours after surgery
Pain scores using the five - point verbal ranking score 24 hours after surgery
24 hours after surgery
Ambulatory status
Periodo de tiempo: 24 hours after surgery
Ambulatory status was assessed using one - day Cumulated Ambulatory Score 24 hours after surgery
24 hours after surgery

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Infection and delayed healing at the graft harvest site
Periodo de tiempo: 6 weeks after surgery
All patients were interviewed for the presence of infection or delayed healing at the graft harvest site 6 weeks after surgery.
6 weeks after surgery
Chronic pain, numbness or discomfort at graft harvest site
Periodo de tiempo: 12 weeks after the surgery
All the patients were reviewed 12 weeks after surgery for the presence of chronic pain, numbness or discomfort at iliac crest harvest
12 weeks after the surgery

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Vigil Peter, MD, Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Publicaciones Generales

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de abril de 2016

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de agosto de 2016

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de noviembre de 2016

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

15 de diciembre de 2016

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

16 de diciembre de 2016

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

19 de diciembre de 2016

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Estimar)

22 de diciembre de 2016

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

20 de diciembre de 2016

Última verificación

1 de diciembre de 2016

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • 07/16/IEC/JMMC&RI

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Ensayos clínicos sobre local infiltration and TAP block

Suscribir