Tumor Landscape Pathological Diagnosis by Large Tissue Sections
Tutkimuksen yleiskatsaus
Tila
Tila
Ehdot
Ehdot
Interventio / Hoito
Interventio / Hoito
Opintotyyppi
Opintotyyppi
Ilmoittautuminen (Odotettu)
Ilmoittautuminen
Osallistumiskriteerit
Kelpoisuusvaatimukset
Kelpoisuusvaatimukset
Opintokelpoiset iät
Hyväksyy terveitä vapaaehtoisia
Sukupuolet, jotka voivat opiskella
Näytteenottomenetelmä
Tutkimusväestö
Kuvaus
Inclusion Criteria:
- Older than 15-year-old
- Did not receive preoperative preoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy
Exclusion Criteria:
patients undergoing preoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy
Opintosuunnitelma
Miten tutkimus on suunniteltu?
Suunnittelun yksityiskohdat
Ryhmien/kohorttien lukumäärä
Kohortit ja interventiot
Ryhmä/KohorttiRyhmä/Kohortti |
Interventio / HoitoInterventio / Hoito |
|---|---|
|
prostate ,traditional sample method
Samples from 100 patients with prostate carcinoma were obtained by traditional sampling method
|
|
|
prostate ,landscape sample method
Samples from 100 patients with prostate carcinoma were obtained by landscape sampling method to testify the clinical value and significance of tumor landscape pathological diagnosis .
|
200 cases of different tumor tissues will be compared by traditional sample method and landscape sample method to testify the clinical value and significance of tumor landscape pathological diagnosis .
Muut nimet:
|
|
liver, traditional sample method
Samples from 100 patients with liver cancer were obtained by traditional sampling method.
|
|
|
liver,landscape sample method
Samples from 100 patients with liver cancer were obtained by landscape sampling method to testify the clinical value and significance of tumor landscape pathological diagnosis .
|
200 cases of different tumor tissues will be compared by traditional sample method and landscape sample method to testify the clinical value and significance of tumor landscape pathological diagnosis .
Muut nimet:
|
|
esophageal ,traditional sample method
Samples from 100 patients with esophageal carcinoma were obtained by traditional sampling method.
|
|
|
esophageal ,landscape sample method
Samples from 100 patients with esophageal carcinoma were obtained by landscape sampling method to testify the clinical value and significance of tumor landscape pathological diagnosis .
|
200 cases of different tumor tissues will be compared by traditional sample method and landscape sample method to testify the clinical value and significance of tumor landscape pathological diagnosis .
Muut nimet:
|
|
GIST,traditional sample method
Samples from 100 patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor were obtained by traditional sampling method.
|
|
|
GIST,landscape sample method
Samples from 100 patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor were obtained by landscape sampling method to testify the clinical value and significance of tumor landscape pathological diagnosis .
|
200 cases of different tumor tissues will be compared by traditional sample method and landscape sample method to testify the clinical value and significance of tumor landscape pathological diagnosis .
Muut nimet:
|
|
colorectal ,traditional sample method
Samples from 100 patients with colorectal carcinoma were obtained by traditional sampling method.
|
|
|
colorectal ,landscape sample method
Samples from 100 patients with colorectal carcinoma were obtained by landscape sampling method to testify the clinical value and significance of tumor landscape pathological diagnosis .
|
200 cases of different tumor tissues will be compared by traditional sample method and landscape sample method to testify the clinical value and significance of tumor landscape pathological diagnosis .
Muut nimet:
|
|
pancreatic ,traditional sample method
Samples from 100 patients with pancreatic carcinoma were obtained by traditional sampling method.
|
|
|
pancreatic,landscape sample method
Samples from 100 patients with pancreatic carcinoma were obtained by landscape sampling method to testify the clinical value and significance of tumor landscape pathological diagnosis .
|
200 cases of different tumor tissues will be compared by traditional sample method and landscape sample method to testify the clinical value and significance of tumor landscape pathological diagnosis .
Muut nimet:
|
|
lung cancer,traditional sample method
Samples from 100 patients with lung cancer were obtained by traditional sampling method.
|
|
|
lung cancer,landscape sample method
Samples from 100 patients with lung cancer were obtained by landscape sampling method to testify the clinical value and significance of tumor landscape pathological diagnosis .
|
200 cases of different tumor tissues will be compared by traditional sample method and landscape sample method to testify the clinical value and significance of tumor landscape pathological diagnosis .
Muut nimet:
|
|
Renal ,traditional sample method
Samples from 100 patients with renal carcinoma were obtained by traditional sampling method.
|
|
|
Renal carcinoma,landscape sample method
Samples from 100 patients with renal carcinoma were obtained by landscape sampling method to testify the clinical value and significance of tumor landscape pathological diagnosis .
|
200 cases of different tumor tissues will be compared by traditional sample method and landscape sample method to testify the clinical value and significance of tumor landscape pathological diagnosis .
Muut nimet:
|
|
Breast cancer,traditional sample method
Samples from 100 patients with breast cancer were obtained by traditional sampling method.
|
|
|
Breast cancer,landscape sample method
Samples from 100 patients with breast cancer were obtained by landscape sampling method to testify the clinical value and significance of tumor landscape pathological diagnosis .
|
200 cases of different tumor tissues will be compared by traditional sample method and landscape sample method to testify the clinical value and significance of tumor landscape pathological diagnosis .
Muut nimet:
|
|
cervical ,traditional sample method
Samples from 100 patients with cervical carcinoma were obtained by traditional sampling method.
|
|
|
cervical ,landscape sample method
Samples from 100 patients with cervical carcinoma were obtained by landscape sampling method to testify the clinical value and significance of tumor landscape pathological diagnosis .
|
200 cases of different tumor tissues will be compared by traditional sample method and landscape sample method to testify the clinical value and significance of tumor landscape pathological diagnosis .
Muut nimet:
|
Mitä tutkimuksessa mitataan?
Ensisijaiset tulostoimenpiteet
Ensisijaiset tulostoimenpiteet
Tulosmittaus |
Toimenpiteen kuvaus |
Aikaikkuna |
|---|---|---|
|
Prostate,traditional and landscape sample method
Aikaikkuna: 1st January, 2018 ~30th June, 2018
|
200 cases of prostate carcinoma sampled by traditional method and landscape method will be compared for precise and comprehensive pathological analysis.
|
1st January, 2018 ~30th June, 2018
|
|
liver,traditional and landscape sample method
Aikaikkuna: 1st January, 2018 ~30th June, 2018
|
200 cases of liver cancer sampled by traditional method and landscape method will be compared for precise and comprehensive pathological analysis.
|
1st January, 2018 ~30th June, 2018
|
|
esophageal,traditional and landscape sample method
Aikaikkuna: 1st January, 2018 ~30th June, 2018
|
200 cases of esophageal carcinoma sampled by traditional method and landscape method will be compared for precise and comprehensive pathological analysis.
|
1st January, 2018 ~30th June, 2018
|
|
GIST,traditional and landscape sample method
Aikaikkuna: 1st July, 2018 ~31st December, 2018
|
200 cases of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST)sampled by traditional method and landscape method will be compared for precise and comprehensive pathological analysis.
|
1st July, 2018 ~31st December, 2018
|
|
colorectal,traditional and landscape sample method
Aikaikkuna: 1st July, 2018 ~31st December, 2018
|
200 cases of colorectal carcinoma sampled by traditional method and landscape method will be compared for precise and comprehensive pathological analysis.
|
1st July, 2018 ~31st December, 2018
|
|
pancreatic,traditional and landscape sample method
Aikaikkuna: 1st July, 2018 ~31st December, 2018
|
200 cases of pancreatic carcinoma sampled by traditional method and landscape method will be compared for precise and comprehensive pathological analysis.
|
1st July, 2018 ~31st December, 2018
|
|
lung, traditional and landscape sample method
Aikaikkuna: 1st July, 2018 ~31st December, 2018
|
200 cases of lung cancer sampled by traditional method and landscape method will be compared for precise and comprehensive pathological analysis.
|
1st July, 2018 ~31st December, 2018
|
|
renal,traditional and landscape sample method
Aikaikkuna: 1st July, 2018 ~31st December, 2018
|
200 cases of renal carcinoma sampled by traditional method and landscape method will be compared for precise and comprehensive pathological analysis.
|
1st July, 2018 ~31st December, 2018
|
|
breast,traditional and landscape sample method
Aikaikkuna: 1st July, 2018 ~31st December, 2018
|
200 cases of breast cancer sampled by traditional method and landscape method will be compared for precise and comprehensive pathological analysis.
|
1st July, 2018 ~31st December, 2018
|
|
cervical,traditional and landscape sample method
Aikaikkuna: 1st July, 2018 ~31st December, 2018
|
200 cases of cervical carcinoma sampled by traditional method and landscape method will be compared for precise and comprehensive pathological analysis.
|
1st July, 2018 ~31st December, 2018
|
Yhteistyökumppanit ja tutkijat
Sponsori
Sponsori
Opintojen ennätyspäivät
Opi tärkeimmät päivämäärät
Opiskelun aloitus (Odotettu)
Opiskelun aloitus
Ensisijainen valmistuminen (Odotettu)
Ensisijainen valmistuminen
Opintojen valmistuminen (Odotettu)
Opintojen valmistuminen
Opintoihin ilmoittautumispäivät
Ensimmäinen lähetetty
Ensimmäinen lähetetty
Ensimmäinen toimitettu, joka täytti QC-kriteerit
Ensimmäinen toimitettu, joka täytti QC-kriteerit
Ensimmäinen Lähetetty (Todellinen)
Ensimmäinen Lähetetty
Tutkimustietojen päivitykset
Viimeisin päivitys julkaistu (Todellinen)
Viimeisin päivitys julkaistu
Viimeisin lähetetty päivitys, joka täytti QC-kriteerit
Viimeisin lähetetty päivitys, joka täytti QC-kriteerit
Viimeksi vahvistettu
Viimeksi vahvistettu
Lisää tietoa
Tähän tutkimukseen liittyvät termit
Avainsanat
Muita asiaankuuluvia MeSH-ehtoja
Muut tutkimustunnusnumerot
Muut tutkimustunnusnumerot
- B2017-113R
Lääke- ja laitetiedot, tutkimusasiakirjat
Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää lääkevalmistetta
Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää laitetuotetta
Nämä tiedot haettiin suoraan verkkosivustolta clinicaltrials.gov ilman muutoksia. Jos sinulla on pyyntöjä muuttaa, poistaa tai päivittää tutkimustietojasi, ota yhteyttä register@clinicaltrials.gov. Heti kun muutos on otettu käyttöön osoitteessa clinicaltrials.gov, se päivitetään automaattisesti myös verkkosivustollemme .