Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Participatory Research for Fine-tuning of a 2.0 System to Optimise Home Management of Oral Cancer Therapies.

This is a prospective testing-validation, interventional, non-pharmacological study on a new app for oral anticancer therapy management.

A total of 80 patients will be considered: 20 evaluable patients in the training step; 60 patients in the validation step. In the training step will be considered evaluable the patients with: at least 6 weeks of treatment; visit at 6 weeks after the start of treatment performed and questionnaires self-administered.

Patients will be visited every 6 weeks. In the training step, patients will remain under observation for a minimum of 6 weeks, until change of therapy (due to progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, death, discontinuation) or for a maximum of 12 weeks. Patients enrolled in the validation step will remain under observation until change of therapy (due to progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, death, discontinuation) or for a maximum of 24 weeks.

The objective of this study is to assess the capability of a newly developed interactive health care application to support patients and health professionals in the shared management of oral anticancer therapies, improving adherence, preventing complications at home, toxicities, improper treatment reductions or interruptions, emergency accesses and to assess the system usability and acceptability by patients and health professionals, integration in the hospital workflow, monitoring over time patient perceived levels of quality of care, quality of life, social support, anxiety, and self-care capability.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Inconnue

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

This is a prospective, interventional, non pharmacological study for testing-validation of a new app for optimising home management of oral therapies for cancer treatment.

All patients will be treated according to the local clinical practice. Enrolment period: 8 (training step) + 12 (validation step) months. Total duration of the study: 36 months. This is a multicenter study. Objective of the study is to assess the capability of a newly developed interactive health care application to support patients and health professionals in the shared management of oral anticancer therapies, and to assess the system usability and acceptability by patients and health professionals.

Eligible patients must meet the following criteria:

  • adult 18-75 years old;
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 1;
  • candidate for treatment with capecitabine or sunitinib as monotherapy (adjuvant and advanced settings allowed);
  • sufficient ability to manage mobile devices after basic training course held at baseline;
  • clear understanding of the Italian language;
  • written informed consent.

Health professionals and patients define the items of the system through participatory design techniques (e.g. focus group sessions, joint review).

To define whether the system is capable of monitoring patient adherence, the number of pills counted by the system (self-reported by the patient at home) will be compared with that counted by the physician as residual pills returned by the patient at the hospital visit. A difference in the number of pills within +/- 10% will be considered acceptable. A comparison of type and grade of toxicity will be made between the adverse events indicated by the system and those reported by the patient at the clinical visit. The quality of the system will be considered adequate if all the grade 3 and at least 80% of the grade 2 or more toxicity data reported by the patient at the time of the visit is recorded in the app.

To investigate system usability and acceptability, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaires will be used. Scores will be subdivided into different subscales and analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Two new questionnaires have been developed and will be used to evaluate patient expectations of the system, and system acceptability + patient-doctor communication. An internationally validated questionnaire translated into Italian on system usability (SUS) will be also administered at the end of observation. Conversational interviews will be audio-recorded, transcribed and analyzed.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

40

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

      • Bergamo, Italie, 24127
        • Azienda Ospedaliera Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo
      • Meldola (FC), Italie, 47014
        • Irst-Irccs
      • Trento, Italie, 38123
        • Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari della Provincia Autonoma di Trento

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans à 75 ans (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ECOG-Performance Status (PS) less or equal to 1;
  • life expectancy > 12 weeks;
  • candidate for treatment with capecitabine or sunitinib as monotherapy (adjuvant and advanced settings allowed);
  • clear understanding of the Italian language;
  • subjects who are, in the opinion of the Investigator, able to understand this study, to cooperate with the study procedures and able to manage mobile devices after basic training course held at baseline;
  • written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients receiving also intravenous anticancer treatment

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Recherche sur les services de santé
  • Répartition: N / A
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation à un seul groupe
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Cancer patients undergoing oral therapy
At the time of therapy prescription, patients candidate for oral therapy with capecitabine or sunitinib will be provided with informations on the side-effects of therapy and on the use and functions of the mobile diary app TreC-Onco. Patients are required to manually insert data into the mobile diary app at least once a day. Patients will be visited every 6 weeks. During the visit, the clinician will compare adherence and toxicity data entered into the mobile diary app with those directly reported by the patient and by drug accountability.

TreC-Onco is composed of two tools aimed at supporting patient self-care and health professional monitoring and intervention:

  1. Mobile diary app. This is an Android app (for Android version 2.2 and higher) that allows patients to record parameters related to their health state (e.g. medications; blood pressure, weight, fever; side-effects or other symptoms) through a mobile device. Data are stored in a central database and are made available in real time to health professionals through a web dashboard on the TreC server or through a tablet app.
  2. Web dashboard. Through this, oncologists can check patient data, monitoring their side-effects and adherence to prescriptions. The Dashboard is optimized for the Firefox browser in version 7 or higher.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Drug accountability comparison
Délai: 3 years
the number of pills counted by the system (self-reported by the patient at home) will be compared with that counted by the physician as residual pills returned by the patient at the hospital visit. A difference in the number of pills within +/- 10% will be considered acceptable.
3 years
Toxicity reporting comparison
Délai: 3 years
A comparison of type and grade of toxicity will be made between the adverse events indicated by the system and those reported by the patient/detected by the doctor at the clinical visit. The quality of the system will be considered adequate if all the grade 3 and at least 80% of the grade 2 toxicity data reported by the patient at the time of the visit is recorded in the app. A comparison will be made between the adverse event start time reported by the system and the time of data-entry by the patient into the system.
3 years

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
System acceptability: HADS questionaire
Délai: 3 years
HADS questionaire will be analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test
3 years
System acceptability: FACT-B questionaire
Délai: 3 years
FACT-B questionaire will be analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test
3 years
System usability: system usability scale (SUS) questionaire
Délai: 3 years
system usability scale (SUS) will be analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test
3 years
System acceptability by the Q-pre questionaire
Délai: 3 years
System acceptability by the Q-pre questionaire using content and template qualitative sociological analysis
3 years
System acceptability by the Q-post questionaire
Délai: 3 years
System acceptability by the Q-post questionaire using content and template qualitative sociological analysis
3 years
System acceptability by semi-structured interviews
Délai: 3 years
System acceptability by semi-structured interviews using content and template qualitative sociological analysis
3 years

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Collaborateurs

Les enquêteurs

  • Chaise d'étude: Alessandro Passardi, MD, IRST IRCCS, Meldola (FC)

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

27 janvier 2016

Achèvement primaire (Anticipé)

1 mai 2021

Achèvement de l'étude (Anticipé)

1 mai 2021

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

26 septembre 2016

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

29 septembre 2016

Première publication (Estimation)

3 octobre 2016

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

26 février 2021

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

25 février 2021

Dernière vérification

1 février 2021

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

INDÉCIS

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

Essais cliniques sur TreC-Onco

3
S'abonner