Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Participatory Research for Fine-tuning of a 2.0 System to Optimise Home Management of Oral Cancer Therapies.

This is a prospective testing-validation, interventional, non-pharmacological study on a new app for oral anticancer therapy management.

A total of 80 patients will be considered: 20 evaluable patients in the training step; 60 patients in the validation step. In the training step will be considered evaluable the patients with: at least 6 weeks of treatment; visit at 6 weeks after the start of treatment performed and questionnaires self-administered.

Patients will be visited every 6 weeks. In the training step, patients will remain under observation for a minimum of 6 weeks, until change of therapy (due to progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, death, discontinuation) or for a maximum of 12 weeks. Patients enrolled in the validation step will remain under observation until change of therapy (due to progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, death, discontinuation) or for a maximum of 24 weeks.

The objective of this study is to assess the capability of a newly developed interactive health care application to support patients and health professionals in the shared management of oral anticancer therapies, improving adherence, preventing complications at home, toxicities, improper treatment reductions or interruptions, emergency accesses and to assess the system usability and acceptability by patients and health professionals, integration in the hospital workflow, monitoring over time patient perceived levels of quality of care, quality of life, social support, anxiety, and self-care capability.

Studienübersicht

Status

Unbekannt

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

This is a prospective, interventional, non pharmacological study for testing-validation of a new app for optimising home management of oral therapies for cancer treatment.

All patients will be treated according to the local clinical practice. Enrolment period: 8 (training step) + 12 (validation step) months. Total duration of the study: 36 months. This is a multicenter study. Objective of the study is to assess the capability of a newly developed interactive health care application to support patients and health professionals in the shared management of oral anticancer therapies, and to assess the system usability and acceptability by patients and health professionals.

Eligible patients must meet the following criteria:

  • adult 18-75 years old;
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 1;
  • candidate for treatment with capecitabine or sunitinib as monotherapy (adjuvant and advanced settings allowed);
  • sufficient ability to manage mobile devices after basic training course held at baseline;
  • clear understanding of the Italian language;
  • written informed consent.

Health professionals and patients define the items of the system through participatory design techniques (e.g. focus group sessions, joint review).

To define whether the system is capable of monitoring patient adherence, the number of pills counted by the system (self-reported by the patient at home) will be compared with that counted by the physician as residual pills returned by the patient at the hospital visit. A difference in the number of pills within +/- 10% will be considered acceptable. A comparison of type and grade of toxicity will be made between the adverse events indicated by the system and those reported by the patient at the clinical visit. The quality of the system will be considered adequate if all the grade 3 and at least 80% of the grade 2 or more toxicity data reported by the patient at the time of the visit is recorded in the app.

To investigate system usability and acceptability, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaires will be used. Scores will be subdivided into different subscales and analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Two new questionnaires have been developed and will be used to evaluate patient expectations of the system, and system acceptability + patient-doctor communication. An internationally validated questionnaire translated into Italian on system usability (SUS) will be also administered at the end of observation. Conversational interviews will be audio-recorded, transcribed and analyzed.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

40

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

      • Bergamo, Italien, 24127
        • Azienda Ospedaliera Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo
      • Meldola (FC), Italien, 47014
        • Irst-Irccs
      • Trento, Italien, 38123
        • Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari della Provincia Autonoma di Trento

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre bis 75 Jahre (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ECOG-Performance Status (PS) less or equal to 1;
  • life expectancy > 12 weeks;
  • candidate for treatment with capecitabine or sunitinib as monotherapy (adjuvant and advanced settings allowed);
  • clear understanding of the Italian language;
  • subjects who are, in the opinion of the Investigator, able to understand this study, to cooperate with the study procedures and able to manage mobile devices after basic training course held at baseline;
  • written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients receiving also intravenous anticancer treatment

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Versorgungsforschung
  • Zuteilung: N / A
  • Interventionsmodell: Einzelgruppenzuweisung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Cancer patients undergoing oral therapy
At the time of therapy prescription, patients candidate for oral therapy with capecitabine or sunitinib will be provided with informations on the side-effects of therapy and on the use and functions of the mobile diary app TreC-Onco. Patients are required to manually insert data into the mobile diary app at least once a day. Patients will be visited every 6 weeks. During the visit, the clinician will compare adherence and toxicity data entered into the mobile diary app with those directly reported by the patient and by drug accountability.

TreC-Onco is composed of two tools aimed at supporting patient self-care and health professional monitoring and intervention:

  1. Mobile diary app. This is an Android app (for Android version 2.2 and higher) that allows patients to record parameters related to their health state (e.g. medications; blood pressure, weight, fever; side-effects or other symptoms) through a mobile device. Data are stored in a central database and are made available in real time to health professionals through a web dashboard on the TreC server or through a tablet app.
  2. Web dashboard. Through this, oncologists can check patient data, monitoring their side-effects and adherence to prescriptions. The Dashboard is optimized for the Firefox browser in version 7 or higher.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Drug accountability comparison
Zeitfenster: 3 years
the number of pills counted by the system (self-reported by the patient at home) will be compared with that counted by the physician as residual pills returned by the patient at the hospital visit. A difference in the number of pills within +/- 10% will be considered acceptable.
3 years
Toxicity reporting comparison
Zeitfenster: 3 years
A comparison of type and grade of toxicity will be made between the adverse events indicated by the system and those reported by the patient/detected by the doctor at the clinical visit. The quality of the system will be considered adequate if all the grade 3 and at least 80% of the grade 2 toxicity data reported by the patient at the time of the visit is recorded in the app. A comparison will be made between the adverse event start time reported by the system and the time of data-entry by the patient into the system.
3 years

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
System acceptability: HADS questionaire
Zeitfenster: 3 years
HADS questionaire will be analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test
3 years
System acceptability: FACT-B questionaire
Zeitfenster: 3 years
FACT-B questionaire will be analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test
3 years
System usability: system usability scale (SUS) questionaire
Zeitfenster: 3 years
system usability scale (SUS) will be analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test
3 years
System acceptability by the Q-pre questionaire
Zeitfenster: 3 years
System acceptability by the Q-pre questionaire using content and template qualitative sociological analysis
3 years
System acceptability by the Q-post questionaire
Zeitfenster: 3 years
System acceptability by the Q-post questionaire using content and template qualitative sociological analysis
3 years
System acceptability by semi-structured interviews
Zeitfenster: 3 years
System acceptability by semi-structured interviews using content and template qualitative sociological analysis
3 years

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Mitarbeiter

Ermittler

  • Studienstuhl: Alessandro Passardi, MD, IRST IRCCS, Meldola (FC)

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

27. Januar 2016

Primärer Abschluss (Voraussichtlich)

1. Mai 2021

Studienabschluss (Voraussichtlich)

1. Mai 2021

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

26. September 2016

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

29. September 2016

Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)

3. Oktober 2016

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

26. Februar 2021

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

25. Februar 2021

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Februar 2021

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • IRST100.18

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

UNENTSCHIEDEN

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur TreC-Onco

3
Abonnieren