Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Double ablation thermique prophylactique et fermeture complète après résection muqueuse endoscopique de gros polypes colorectaux non pédonculés : un essai contrôlé randomisé (ABLATION)

Double ablation thermique prophylactique et fermeture complète après résection endoscopique de la muqueuse de gros polypes colorectaux non pédonculés : un essai contrôlé randomisé - (HAPC-RCT)

Large (≥20mm) colorectal polyps often harbor areas of advanced neoplasia, making them immediate colorectal cancer (CRC) precursors. Such polyps have to be completely removed to prevent CRC and to avoid surgery and/or adjuvant therapy. The laterally spreading lesions (LSLs) are removed via endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). However, recurrence is common. New techniques for LSL resection (hybrid argon plasma coagulation (h-APC) margin and base ablation) have shown a reduction in recurrence following the interventions.

We hypothesize that performing hybrid argon plasma coagulation (h-APC) margin and base ablation during EMR of large (≥20mm) colorectal LSLs will lead to lower rates of lesion recurrence compared to Snare tip soft coagulation (STSC) margin ablation.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

This trial is an open-label, two-arm, parallel-group, multicenter, randomized controlled superiority trial. Patients undergoing EMR will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo additional STSC margin ablation (control group and current standard of care) or h-APC ablation of the margins and base (experimental group).

Patients will be enrolled in the study before the endoscopy procedure, or in the outpatient clinic.

Eligible patients who have consented to participate in the study will be asked to take a standard colonoscopy preparation regimen before their scheduled procedure.

EMR intervention will be performed for all eligible patients with a large laterally spreading lesions (LSLs) by expert endoscopists. Only if a polyp meets inclusion criteria, the study subject will be enrolled and randomized into one of these 2 groups:

  • Group 1: EMR + h-APC margin and base thermal ablation
  • Group 2: EMR + STSC of the margin

The standard EMR technique will be used for the primary removal of all polyps. Submucosal injection will be used to lift the polyp from the muscularis propria. Injection will be used as per the current standard of care using a contrast agent and a lifting agent (e.g., NaCl 0.9% or Voluven). Snare electrocautery resection will be facilitated until complete visible removal of the complete polyp. Electrocautery snare technique will be facilitated using standard microprocessor-controlled electrocautery. If residual polyp tissue cannot be removed by a snare, other means such as cold snare (i.e., for small residual polyp tissue that cannot be engaged into standard snares) or avulsive methods will be used. Randomization will be performed after resection is complete and before thermal ablation. After the complete removal of the polyp, depending on the randomization group, h-APC or STSC techniques will be used for margin and base or only margin ablation of the post-EMR defect.

If multiple large polyps are found and removed, the study polyp will be marked with two tattoos 3 cm distal and 3 cm proximal to the lesion, to clearly identify the study polyp associated scar in the follow-up colonoscopy. Polyps will be sent to the pathology lab and evaluated according to standard practice by institutional pathologists. To determine the homogeneity and depth of h-APC margin ablation in the pathology lab, some ablated margins might be resected using the standard cold snare technique.

Telephone calls after 14 days following the EMR will be conducted to assess possible adverse events that occurred within the first 14 days after EMR.

Follow-up 1: Surveillance colonoscopy occurring 6 months after the EMR intervention for the assessment of recurrence (biopsy from the post-EMR site to be confirmed by pathology) following the intervention (h-APC) and the control (STSC) techniques.

Follow-up 2: Surveillance colonoscopy at 18 months (± 6 months) after the EMR intervention for the assessment of recurrence (biopsy from the post-EMR site to be confirmed by pathology) at FU1.

Patients with visible recurrence at the EMR site will undergo additional resection for complete eradication of recurrence. Patients with no visible but pathology-confirmed recurrence will be rescheduled for another colonoscopy with subsequent treatment of the post-EMR site and another follow-up colonoscopy for biopsies and confirmation of complete/incomplete eradication within 18 months after the initial EMR.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

892

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
        • Recrutement
        • Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
        • Chercheur principal:
          • Daniel Von Renteln, MD
        • Contact:

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult ≥18 years old
  • patients undergoing EMR for a large (≥20mm) colorectal LSL
  • patients providing written and informed consent for study participation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inflammatory bowel disease;
  • non-elective colonoscopy;
  • poor general health (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification >III);
  • coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia (international normalized ratio ≥1.5 or platelets <50 x 109/L);
  • pedunculated polyps (Paris class Ip, Isp);
  • overt signs of deep submucosal invasive cancer (JNET 3);
  • biopsy proven invasive carcinoma in a potential study polyp.
  • Pregnant women

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: La prévention
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Double

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR)+Hybrid Argon Plasma Coagulation (h-APC)

Standard endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) technique will be used for the primary removal of all polyps, utilizing submucosal injection. Electrocautery snare technique will be facilitated using standard microprocessor-controlled electrocautery (e.g., ERBE VIO Endocut 3-1-6). Ablation of the margin and base of the polypectomy site will be performed using Hybrid Argon Plasma Coagulation (h-APC, Erbe Hybrid APC).

The hybrid argon plasma coagulation (h-APC) combines an ablation technique (APC) with the option for submucosal saline injection using a high-pressure water jet. The technique allows for the lifting of dysplastic epithelium, creating a cushion under the mucosa to facilitate the ablation of larger areas more thoroughly and with higher energy settings, while posing a low risk for side effects or complications.

Autres noms:
  • h-APC
Comparateur actif: Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) + Snare tip soft coagulation (STSC)

Standard endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) technique will be used for the primary removal of all polyps, utilizing submucosal injection. Electrocautery snare technique will be facilitated using standard microprocessor-controlled electrocautery (e.g., ERBE VIO Endocut 3-1-6). Ablation of the margin of the polypectomy site will be performed using Snare tip soft coagulation (STSC).

The Snare tip soft coagulation (STSC) involves using a snare to remove polyps, while simultaneously applying soft coagulation to the surrounding tissue using a specialized tip on the snare.

Autres noms:
  • STSC

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Recurrence after colorectal EMR between the h-APC and STSC methods
Délai: 4 years

Lesion recurrence at first follow-up after EMR of large (≥20mm) colorectal LSLs when performing STSC margin ablation or h-APC margin and base ablation. Defined by visual recurrence or pathology-confirmed hyperplastic, serrated or adenomatous histology of the same histology of the index lesion at the tattooed resection site on at least one of four random biopsies of resection scars. These will be evaluated from an intention to treat and per protocol standpoint.

4 years

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Adverse event rates after EMR with STSC or h-APC
Délai: 4 years

Adverse event rates after EMR of large (≥20mm) colorectal LSLs when performing EMR with STSC margin ablation or h-APC margin and base ablation. Defined as either a) delayed bleeding (defined as blood per rectum resulting in emergency room visit, unplanned hospitalization; endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical intervention) or b) delayed perforation (defined as endoscopic or radiologic evidence of air or luminal contents outside the gastrointestinal tract). These will be evaluated from an intention to treat and per protocol standpoint.

4 years
Technical success of STSC or h-APC
Délai: 4 years

Technical success of STSC or h-APC defined as achieving a complete uninterrupted ring ofcircumferential margin ablation for STSC and h-APC, without crossover to complete the margin ablation, and achieving 100% surface ablation of the resection base for h-APC.

4 years
Lesion recurrence at the 18-month follow-up after EMR with STSC or h-APC
Délai: 4 years

Lesion recurrence at the 18-month follow-up after EMR with STSC or h-APC

4 years
High-grade dysplasia or colorectal cancer occurence after EMR during the 18-month follow-up period.
Délai: 4 years

High-grade dysplasia or colorectal cancer occurence after EMR during the 18-month follow-up period at the resection site.

4 years
CRC occurrence during the 18-month follow-up period
Délai: 4 years

CRC occurrence after EMR during the 18-month follow-up period

4 years

Autres mesures de résultats

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Temps d'ablation STSC ou h-APC
Délai: 4 ans
4 ans
Perte de suivi
Délai: 4 ans
4 ans
Temps de fermeture du défaut
Délai: 4 ans
4 ans
Coûts associés aux procédures
Délai: 4 ans
4 ans
Colonoscopies required to achieve lesion clearance after EMR with STSC or h-APC
Délai: 4 years

Colonoscopies required to achieve lesion clearance, defined as no histologic recurrence at the resection scar on follow-up.

4 years
EMR procedure time
Délai: 4 years

EMR procedure time with STSC or h-APC

4 years
Intestinal preservation 18 months after ablation
Délai: 4 years

Defined as no surgical resection performed.

4 years
Clinically significant delayed bleeding in the proximal colon after EMR with STSC or h-APC
Délai: 14 days

Defined as blood per rectum resulting in emergency room visit, unplanned hospitalization; endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical intervention. Proximal defined as proximal to the splenic flexure.

14 days
Clinically significant delayed bleeding in the distal colon after EMR with STSC or h-APC
Délai: 14 days

Defined as blood per rectum resulting in emergency room visit, unplanned hospitalization; endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical intervention. Distal defined as splenic flexure and distal.

14 days
Clinically significant delayed bleeding in the entire colon after EMR with STSC or h-APC
Délai: 14 days

Defined as blood per rectum resulting in emergency room visit, unplanned hospitalization; endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical intervention.

14 days
Delayed perforation after EMR with STSC or h-APC
Délai: 14 days

Delayed perforation defined as endoscopic or radiologic evidence of air or luminal contents outside the gastrointestinal tract

14 days
Any delayed bleeding after EMR
Délai: 14 days

Any delayed bleeding after EMR, defined as blood per rectum after the procedure

14 days
Technical success for complete defect closure
Délai: 4 years

Defined as adequate apposition of the mucosal defect margins without visible submucosal areas >3 mm along the closure line.

4 years
Factors associated with recurrence after colorectal EMR between the h-APC and STSC methods
Délai: 4 years

Lesion recurrence at first follow-up after EMR of large (≥20mm) colorectal LSLs when performing STSC margin ablation or h-APC margin and base ablation. Defined by pathology-confirmed hyperplastic, serrated or adenomatous histology of the same histology of the index lesion at the tattooed resection site on at least one of four random biopsies of resection scars. Factors such as age, sex, lesion size (20-29mm, ≥30mm; 20-39mm, ≥40mm), histology, location, difficulty (difficult defined as peri-appendiceal, on the ileocecal valve, resection previously attempted and failed by a referring endoscopist), use of epinephrine in submucosal injection, submucosal lifting solution, resection type (en bloc [i.e. in one piece] vs piecemeal), technical success, study site, endoscopist yearly EMR volume, presence of intraprocedural bleeding, utilization of adjunct resection methods, ileocecal or anus involvement, polyp histology/morphology will be evaluated.

4 years
Factors associated with adverse event rates after EMR with STSC or h-APC
Délai: 30 days

Adverse event rates after EMR of large (≥20mm) colorectal LSLs when performing EMR with STSC margin ablation or h-APC margin and base ablation. Defined as either a) delayed bleeding (defined as blood per rectum resulting in emergency room visit, unplanned hospitalization; endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical intervention) or b) delayed perforation (defined as endoscopic or radiologic evidence of air or luminal contents outside the gastrointestinal tract). Factors such as age, sex, lesion size, morphology, histology, location, complete/incomplete/no defect closure, prophylactic vessel ablation, base ablation, anticoagulant use will be evaluated

30 days

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

19 juillet 2024

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

1 octobre 2027

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

1 avril 2028

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

15 février 2024

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

15 février 2024

Première publication (Réel)

22 février 2024

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

18 septembre 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

17 septembre 2026

Dernière vérification

1 septembre 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

OUI

Description du régime IPD

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures and appendices).

Délai de partage IPD

Beginning 12 months and ending 36 months following article publication.

Critères d'accès au partage IPD

Proposals should be directed to daniel.von.renteln.med@ssss.gouv.qc.ca . To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement

Type d'informations de prise en charge du partage d'IPD

  • PROTOCOLE D'ÉTUDE
  • SÈVE
  • CIF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • RSE

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner