Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Doble ablación térmica profiláctica y cierre completo después de la resección endoscópica de la mucosa de grandes pólipos colorrectales no pediculados: un ensayo controlado aleatorio (ABLATION)

17 de septiembre de 2026 actualizado por: Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Ablación térmica doble profiláctica y cierre completo después de la resección endoscópica de la mucosa de pólipos colorrectales grandes no pediculados: un ensayo controlado aleatorio (HAPC-RCT)

Large (≥20mm) colorectal polyps often harbor areas of advanced neoplasia, making them immediate colorectal cancer (CRC) precursors. Such polyps have to be completely removed to prevent CRC and to avoid surgery and/or adjuvant therapy. The laterally spreading lesions (LSLs) are removed via endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). However, recurrence is common. New techniques for LSL resection (hybrid argon plasma coagulation (h-APC) margin and base ablation) have shown a reduction in recurrence following the interventions.

We hypothesize that performing hybrid argon plasma coagulation (h-APC) margin and base ablation during EMR of large (≥20mm) colorectal LSLs will lead to lower rates of lesion recurrence compared to Snare tip soft coagulation (STSC) margin ablation.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

This trial is an open-label, two-arm, parallel-group, multicenter, randomized controlled superiority trial. Patients undergoing EMR will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo additional STSC margin ablation (control group and current standard of care) or h-APC ablation of the margins and base (experimental group).

Patients will be enrolled in the study before the endoscopy procedure, or in the outpatient clinic.

Eligible patients who have consented to participate in the study will be asked to take a standard colonoscopy preparation regimen before their scheduled procedure.

EMR intervention will be performed for all eligible patients with a large laterally spreading lesions (LSLs) by expert endoscopists. Only if a polyp meets inclusion criteria, the study subject will be enrolled and randomized into one of these 2 groups:

  • Group 1: EMR + h-APC margin and base thermal ablation
  • Group 2: EMR + STSC of the margin

The standard EMR technique will be used for the primary removal of all polyps. Submucosal injection will be used to lift the polyp from the muscularis propria. Injection will be used as per the current standard of care using a contrast agent and a lifting agent (e.g., NaCl 0.9% or Voluven). Snare electrocautery resection will be facilitated until complete visible removal of the complete polyp. Electrocautery snare technique will be facilitated using standard microprocessor-controlled electrocautery. If residual polyp tissue cannot be removed by a snare, other means such as cold snare (i.e., for small residual polyp tissue that cannot be engaged into standard snares) or avulsive methods will be used. Randomization will be performed after resection is complete and before thermal ablation. After the complete removal of the polyp, depending on the randomization group, h-APC or STSC techniques will be used for margin and base or only margin ablation of the post-EMR defect.

If multiple large polyps are found and removed, the study polyp will be marked with two tattoos 3 cm distal and 3 cm proximal to the lesion, to clearly identify the study polyp associated scar in the follow-up colonoscopy. Polyps will be sent to the pathology lab and evaluated according to standard practice by institutional pathologists. To determine the homogeneity and depth of h-APC margin ablation in the pathology lab, some ablated margins might be resected using the standard cold snare technique.

Telephone calls after 14 days following the EMR will be conducted to assess possible adverse events that occurred within the first 14 days after EMR.

Follow-up 1: Surveillance colonoscopy occurring 6 months after the EMR intervention for the assessment of recurrence (biopsy from the post-EMR site to be confirmed by pathology) following the intervention (h-APC) and the control (STSC) techniques.

Follow-up 2: Surveillance colonoscopy at 18 months (± 6 months) after the EMR intervention for the assessment of recurrence (biopsy from the post-EMR site to be confirmed by pathology) at FU1.

Patients with visible recurrence at the EMR site will undergo additional resection for complete eradication of recurrence. Patients with no visible but pathology-confirmed recurrence will be rescheduled for another colonoscopy with subsequent treatment of the post-EMR site and another follow-up colonoscopy for biopsies and confirmation of complete/incomplete eradication within 18 months after the initial EMR.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

892

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canadá
        • Reclutamiento
        • Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
        • Investigador principal:
          • Daniel Von Renteln, MD
        • Contacto:

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult ≥18 years old
  • patients undergoing EMR for a large (≥20mm) colorectal LSL
  • patients providing written and informed consent for study participation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inflammatory bowel disease;
  • non-elective colonoscopy;
  • poor general health (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification >III);
  • coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia (international normalized ratio ≥1.5 or platelets <50 x 109/L);
  • pedunculated polyps (Paris class Ip, Isp);
  • overt signs of deep submucosal invasive cancer (JNET 3);
  • biopsy proven invasive carcinoma in a potential study polyp.
  • Pregnant women

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Prevención
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Doble

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR)+Hybrid Argon Plasma Coagulation (h-APC)

Standard endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) technique will be used for the primary removal of all polyps, utilizing submucosal injection. Electrocautery snare technique will be facilitated using standard microprocessor-controlled electrocautery (e.g., ERBE VIO Endocut 3-1-6). Ablation of the margin and base of the polypectomy site will be performed using Hybrid Argon Plasma Coagulation (h-APC, Erbe Hybrid APC).

The hybrid argon plasma coagulation (h-APC) combines an ablation technique (APC) with the option for submucosal saline injection using a high-pressure water jet. The technique allows for the lifting of dysplastic epithelium, creating a cushion under the mucosa to facilitate the ablation of larger areas more thoroughly and with higher energy settings, while posing a low risk for side effects or complications.

Otros nombres:
  • h-APC
Comparador activo: Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) + Snare tip soft coagulation (STSC)

Standard endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) technique will be used for the primary removal of all polyps, utilizing submucosal injection. Electrocautery snare technique will be facilitated using standard microprocessor-controlled electrocautery (e.g., ERBE VIO Endocut 3-1-6). Ablation of the margin of the polypectomy site will be performed using Snare tip soft coagulation (STSC).

The Snare tip soft coagulation (STSC) involves using a snare to remove polyps, while simultaneously applying soft coagulation to the surrounding tissue using a specialized tip on the snare.

Otros nombres:
  • STSC

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Recurrence after colorectal EMR between the h-APC and STSC methods
Periodo de tiempo: 4 years

Lesion recurrence at first follow-up after EMR of large (≥20mm) colorectal LSLs when performing STSC margin ablation or h-APC margin and base ablation. Defined by visual recurrence or pathology-confirmed hyperplastic, serrated or adenomatous histology of the same histology of the index lesion at the tattooed resection site on at least one of four random biopsies of resection scars. These will be evaluated from an intention to treat and per protocol standpoint.

4 years

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Adverse event rates after EMR with STSC or h-APC
Periodo de tiempo: 4 years

Adverse event rates after EMR of large (≥20mm) colorectal LSLs when performing EMR with STSC margin ablation or h-APC margin and base ablation. Defined as either a) delayed bleeding (defined as blood per rectum resulting in emergency room visit, unplanned hospitalization; endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical intervention) or b) delayed perforation (defined as endoscopic or radiologic evidence of air or luminal contents outside the gastrointestinal tract). These will be evaluated from an intention to treat and per protocol standpoint.

4 years
Technical success of STSC or h-APC
Periodo de tiempo: 4 years

Technical success of STSC or h-APC defined as achieving a complete uninterrupted ring ofcircumferential margin ablation for STSC and h-APC, without crossover to complete the margin ablation, and achieving 100% surface ablation of the resection base for h-APC.

4 years
Lesion recurrence at the 18-month follow-up after EMR with STSC or h-APC
Periodo de tiempo: 4 years

Lesion recurrence at the 18-month follow-up after EMR with STSC or h-APC

4 years
High-grade dysplasia or colorectal cancer occurence after EMR during the 18-month follow-up period.
Periodo de tiempo: 4 years

High-grade dysplasia or colorectal cancer occurence after EMR during the 18-month follow-up period at the resection site.

4 years
CRC occurrence during the 18-month follow-up period
Periodo de tiempo: 4 years

CRC occurrence after EMR during the 18-month follow-up period

4 years

Otras medidas de resultado

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Tiempo de ablación STSC o h-APC
Periodo de tiempo: 4 años
4 años
Pérdida de seguimiento
Periodo de tiempo: 4 años
4 años
Tiempo de cierre de defectos
Periodo de tiempo: 4 años
4 años
Costos asociados a los trámites.
Periodo de tiempo: 4 años
4 años
Colonoscopies required to achieve lesion clearance after EMR with STSC or h-APC
Periodo de tiempo: 4 years

Colonoscopies required to achieve lesion clearance, defined as no histologic recurrence at the resection scar on follow-up.

4 years
EMR procedure time
Periodo de tiempo: 4 years

EMR procedure time with STSC or h-APC

4 years
Intestinal preservation 18 months after ablation
Periodo de tiempo: 4 years

Defined as no surgical resection performed.

4 years
Clinically significant delayed bleeding in the proximal colon after EMR with STSC or h-APC
Periodo de tiempo: 14 days

Defined as blood per rectum resulting in emergency room visit, unplanned hospitalization; endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical intervention. Proximal defined as proximal to the splenic flexure.

14 days
Clinically significant delayed bleeding in the distal colon after EMR with STSC or h-APC
Periodo de tiempo: 14 days

Defined as blood per rectum resulting in emergency room visit, unplanned hospitalization; endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical intervention. Distal defined as splenic flexure and distal.

14 days
Clinically significant delayed bleeding in the entire colon after EMR with STSC or h-APC
Periodo de tiempo: 14 days

Defined as blood per rectum resulting in emergency room visit, unplanned hospitalization; endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical intervention.

14 days
Delayed perforation after EMR with STSC or h-APC
Periodo de tiempo: 14 days

Delayed perforation defined as endoscopic or radiologic evidence of air or luminal contents outside the gastrointestinal tract

14 days
Any delayed bleeding after EMR
Periodo de tiempo: 14 days

Any delayed bleeding after EMR, defined as blood per rectum after the procedure

14 days
Technical success for complete defect closure
Periodo de tiempo: 4 years

Defined as adequate apposition of the mucosal defect margins without visible submucosal areas >3 mm along the closure line.

4 years
Factors associated with recurrence after colorectal EMR between the h-APC and STSC methods
Periodo de tiempo: 4 years

Lesion recurrence at first follow-up after EMR of large (≥20mm) colorectal LSLs when performing STSC margin ablation or h-APC margin and base ablation. Defined by pathology-confirmed hyperplastic, serrated or adenomatous histology of the same histology of the index lesion at the tattooed resection site on at least one of four random biopsies of resection scars. Factors such as age, sex, lesion size (20-29mm, ≥30mm; 20-39mm, ≥40mm), histology, location, difficulty (difficult defined as peri-appendiceal, on the ileocecal valve, resection previously attempted and failed by a referring endoscopist), use of epinephrine in submucosal injection, submucosal lifting solution, resection type (en bloc [i.e. in one piece] vs piecemeal), technical success, study site, endoscopist yearly EMR volume, presence of intraprocedural bleeding, utilization of adjunct resection methods, ileocecal or anus involvement, polyp histology/morphology will be evaluated.

4 years
Factors associated with adverse event rates after EMR with STSC or h-APC
Periodo de tiempo: 30 days

Adverse event rates after EMR of large (≥20mm) colorectal LSLs when performing EMR with STSC margin ablation or h-APC margin and base ablation. Defined as either a) delayed bleeding (defined as blood per rectum resulting in emergency room visit, unplanned hospitalization; endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical intervention) or b) delayed perforation (defined as endoscopic or radiologic evidence of air or luminal contents outside the gastrointestinal tract). Factors such as age, sex, lesion size, morphology, histology, location, complete/incomplete/no defect closure, prophylactic vessel ablation, base ablation, anticoagulant use will be evaluated

30 days

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

19 de julio de 2024

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

1 de octubre de 2027

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

1 de abril de 2028

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

15 de febrero de 2024

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

15 de febrero de 2024

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

22 de febrero de 2024

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

18 de septiembre de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

17 de septiembre de 2026

Última verificación

1 de septiembre de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

SÍ

Descripción del plan IPD

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures and appendices).

Marco de tiempo para compartir IPD

Beginning 12 months and ending 36 months following article publication.

Criterios de acceso compartido de IPD

Proposals should be directed to daniel.von.renteln.med@ssss.gouv.qc.ca . To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement

Tipo de información de apoyo para compartir IPD

  • PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDIO
  • SAVIA
  • CIF
  • CÓDIGO_ANALÍTICO
  • RSC

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir