- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT06652347
Comprendre les préférences et les points de vue des personnes âgées sur l'utilisation des évaluations fonctionnelles gériatriques et objectives pour la planification du traitement du cancer.
Facilitating the Engagement and Satisfaction of Older Adults in Their Cancer Care Planning: A Randomized Study to Understand the Preferences and Views of Older Adults Regarding the Use of Geriatric and Objective Functional Assessments for Cancer Treatment Planning
This Interventional clinical study aims to explore how receiving information about their health and physical abilities affects the treatment decisions of older adults. The study will look at whether sharing detailed assessments of their health and functional status helps older adults better understand their condition and make informed decisions about their care.
The main question it aims to answer is if providing this information changes the treatment priorities of older adults, helping them focus on what matters most to them in their medical care.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
This randomized, interventional, cancer care delivery trial will test whether receipt of Geriatric Assessment (GA) and Objective Functional Status (OFS) assessment data affects older adults' treatment priorities. It will also assess the preferences of older adults for the collection, sharing, and use of their assessment data. Finally, it will explore whether less fit patients experience a lower level of satisfaction and a greater degree of regret with their decision to undergo anti-cancer therapy. This study will utilize a randomized design where participants will be randomized to either the intervention arm (early sharing of GA and OFS results) or to the control arm (delayed sharing of GA and OFS results). To assess patients' preferences for quality vs quantity of life, the investigators will use the Quality Quantity (QQ) questionnaire. All patients will complete this at baseline and then undergo their GA and OFS assessments. Patients randomized to the intervention group will be provided the results of their GA and OFS assessments, and then complete the QQ Questionnaire for a second time to assess for any changes following receipt of their assessment results. Patients randomized to the control group will undergo the assessments and complete the same questionnaire as the intervention group but will not receive the results of their GA and OFS assessments prior to completing the second QQ Questionnaire. For the control group, assessment results will be shared with patients after completion of the follow-up QQ Questionnaire. After reviewing their assessment results, patients in both groups will then complete a questionnaire that inquire about their preferences for receipt, use, and sharing of their assessment data. It will also inquire about the degree to which receipt of these data affected how they experienced their cancer care.
The Investigators will determine whether sharing of geriatric and OFS assessment results affected patients' treatment priorities by measuring the absolute change from baseline in the QQ questionnaire scores for quantity and quality of life, comparing the change in the intervention versus the control group. The Investigators will also describe patients' preferences for the collection, use and sharing of their assessment data as reported in the preferences questionnaire, both overall and by race/ethnicity. To explore differences in patients' satisfaction with their decision to pursue anti-cancer therapy by functional status level, participants will complete the "Was it Worth It" (WIWI) questionnaire at the first of either 1) the conclusion of their treatment regimen or 2) three months after enrollment. The provider assessment will ask whether patients experienced any of the following: a toxicity of treatment ≥grade 3, treatment dose reduction, treatment interruption, treatment discontinuation, hospitalization, or a decline in performance status.
Type d'étude
Inscription (Estimé)
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Coordonnées de l'étude
- Nom: Zachary Frosch, MD MSHP
- Numéro de téléphone: 215-728-2674
- E-mail: Zachary.Frosch@fccc.edu
Sauvegarde des contacts de l'étude
- Nom: Leslie J Fortin, MPH
- Numéro de téléphone: 215-214-3996
- E-mail: Leslie.Fortin@fccc.edu
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, États-Unis, 19111
- Recrutement
- Fox Chase Cancer Center
-
Contact:
- Leslie J Fortin, MPH
- Numéro de téléphone: 215-214-3996
- E-mail: Leslie.Fortin@fccc.edu
-
Contact:
- Gerald T Nkogbu, MBBS, MSc
- Numéro de téléphone: 215-214-5378
- E-mail: gerald.nkogbu@fccc.edu
-
Chercheur principal:
- Zachary Frosch, MD, MSHP
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
Accepte les volontaires sains
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 65
At the time of study screening either:
- Started a new qualifying index regimen within the last 30 days (inclusive)
- Are being considered for a new qualifying index regimen
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Patients will be excluded if they
- Do not have the capacity to consent to study procedures
- Are unable to complete English language questionnaires
- Are already using an activity tracker on a daily basis (and therefore may be aware of their current level of activity)
- Are enrolled in another study in which physical activity is a substantial part or all of the therapeutic intervention or where physical activity is specifically being evaluated and shared with patients. Patients on studies not evaluating or sharing physical activity are eligible for the present study if they meet the other inclusion/exclusion criteria and participation in the present study is not excluded by other studies in which they are enrolled.
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Soins de soutien
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: Early Sharing Arm
early sharing of GA and OFS results to participants |
Early vs. delayed sharing of GA and OFS diagnostic results and how that sharing affects patient preferences, decision- making, and satisfaction in the context of participants' cancer care.
Autres noms:
|
|
Aucune intervention: Delayed Sharing Arm
delayed sharing of GA and OFS results to participants |
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Absolute change in QQ-Length of life from baseline to post-intervention
Délai: From baseline questionnaire at enrollment to post intervention questionnaire at an average of 4 weeks after enrollment.
|
The QQ uses a 5-point Likert scale to rate each of the 4 questions on the QQ-L subscale. The scores for this subscale are then summed, meaning that patients will receive a score ranging from 4-20 for the QQ-L. The total score from the 4 QQ-L items measures the strength of a participant's preference for length of life, with higher scores meaning greater preference for length of life. |
From baseline questionnaire at enrollment to post intervention questionnaire at an average of 4 weeks after enrollment.
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
The secondary outcome will be the absolute change in the QQ quality of life subscale (QQ-Q) from baseline to post-intervention.
Délai: From baseline questionnaire at enrollment to post intervention questionnaire at an average of 4 weeks after enrollment.
|
The QQ uses a 5-point Likert scale to rate each of the 4 questions on the QQ-Q subscale. The scores for the subscale are then summed, meaning that patients will receive a score ranging from 4-20 for the QQ-Q. The total score from the 4 QQ-Q items measures the strength of a participant's preference for quality of life, with higher scores meaning greater preference for quality of life. |
From baseline questionnaire at enrollment to post intervention questionnaire at an average of 4 weeks after enrollment.
|
Autres mesures de résultats
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
The proportion of patients who, on the Was It Worth It (WIWI) questionnaire, report that their treatment was worthwhile, that they would undergo it again, and that they would recommend it to others.
Délai: From enrollment to the end of treatment or at 3 months after study entry, whichever comes first.
|
The proportion of patients who, on the Was It Worth It (WIWI) questionnaire, report that their treatment was worthwhile, that they would undergo it again, and that they would recommend it to others. |
From enrollment to the end of treatment or at 3 months after study entry, whichever comes first.
|
|
Summary/descriptive statistics for participants' answers to the preferences questionnaire.
Délai: From baseline questionnaire at enrollment to post intervention questionnaire at an average of 4 weeks after enrollment.
|
It inquires about their preferences for receipt, use and sharing of their assessment results, along with the degree to which receipt of these results affected their understanding or approach to their care |
From baseline questionnaire at enrollment to post intervention questionnaire at an average of 4 weeks after enrollment.
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Collaborateurs
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: Zachary Frosch, MD, MSHP, Fox Chase Cancer Center
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Réel)
Achèvement primaire (Estimé)
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
- Essai contrôlé randomisé
- suivi de la condition physique
- Prestation de soins Intervention
- État fonctionnel chez les personnes âgées
- Préférences en matière de traitement du cancer
- Qualité vs quantité de vie
- Résultats rapportés par les patients en oncologie
- Qualité de vie dans les soins contre le cancer
- Évaluations de la santé fonctionnelle
- Traitement du cancer centré sur le patient
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
- Qualité des soins de santé, accès et évaluation
- Techniques d'investigation
- Méthodes épidémiologiques
- Thérapeutique
- Procédures chirurgicales, opératoires
- Collecte de données
- Mécanismes d'évaluation des soins de santé
- Qualité des soins de santé
- Santé publique
- Environnement et santé publique
- Phénomènes physiologiques
- Croissance et développement
- Techniques cosmétiques
- Enquêtes et questionnaires
- Vieillissement
- Body Modification, Non-Therapeutic
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- 24-1020
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
Description du régime IPD
Individual Participant Data will not be shared due to privacy concerns.
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .