Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Comprensión de las preferencias y opiniones de los adultos mayores sobre el uso de evaluaciones funcionales objetivas y geriátricas para la planificación del tratamiento del cáncer.

16 de septiembre de 2026 actualizado por: Zachary Frosch, Fox Chase Cancer Center

Facilitating the Engagement and Satisfaction of Older Adults in Their Cancer Care Planning: A Randomized Study to Understand the Preferences and Views of Older Adults Regarding the Use of Geriatric and Objective Functional Assessments for Cancer Treatment Planning

This Interventional clinical study aims to explore how receiving information about their health and physical abilities affects the treatment decisions of older adults. The study will look at whether sharing detailed assessments of their health and functional status helps older adults better understand their condition and make informed decisions about their care.

The main question it aims to answer is if providing this information changes the treatment priorities of older adults, helping them focus on what matters most to them in their medical care.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Reclutamiento

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

This randomized, interventional, cancer care delivery trial will test whether receipt of Geriatric Assessment (GA) and Objective Functional Status (OFS) assessment data affects older adults' treatment priorities. It will also assess the preferences of older adults for the collection, sharing, and use of their assessment data. Finally, it will explore whether less fit patients experience a lower level of satisfaction and a greater degree of regret with their decision to undergo anti-cancer therapy. This study will utilize a randomized design where participants will be randomized to either the intervention arm (early sharing of GA and OFS results) or to the control arm (delayed sharing of GA and OFS results). To assess patients' preferences for quality vs quantity of life, the investigators will use the Quality Quantity (QQ) questionnaire. All patients will complete this at baseline and then undergo their GA and OFS assessments. Patients randomized to the intervention group will be provided the results of their GA and OFS assessments, and then complete the QQ Questionnaire for a second time to assess for any changes following receipt of their assessment results. Patients randomized to the control group will undergo the assessments and complete the same questionnaire as the intervention group but will not receive the results of their GA and OFS assessments prior to completing the second QQ Questionnaire. For the control group, assessment results will be shared with patients after completion of the follow-up QQ Questionnaire. After reviewing their assessment results, patients in both groups will then complete a questionnaire that inquire about their preferences for receipt, use, and sharing of their assessment data. It will also inquire about the degree to which receipt of these data affected how they experienced their cancer care.

The Investigators will determine whether sharing of geriatric and OFS assessment results affected patients' treatment priorities by measuring the absolute change from baseline in the QQ questionnaire scores for quantity and quality of life, comparing the change in the intervention versus the control group. The Investigators will also describe patients' preferences for the collection, use and sharing of their assessment data as reported in the preferences questionnaire, both overall and by race/ethnicity. To explore differences in patients' satisfaction with their decision to pursue anti-cancer therapy by functional status level, participants will complete the "Was it Worth It" (WIWI) questionnaire at the first of either 1) the conclusion of their treatment regimen or 2) three months after enrollment. The provider assessment will ask whether patients experienced any of the following: a toxicity of treatment ≥grade 3, treatment dose reduction, treatment interruption, treatment discontinuation, hospitalization, or a decline in performance status.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

100

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

Copia de seguridad de contactos de estudio

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Estados Unidos, 19111
        • Reclutamiento
        • Fox Chase Cancer Center
        • Contacto:
        • Contacto:
        • Investigador principal:
          • Zachary Frosch, MD, MSHP

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

65 años y mayores (Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 65

At the time of study screening either:

  • Started a new qualifying index regimen within the last 30 days (inclusive)
  • Are being considered for a new qualifying index regimen

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients will be excluded if they

    • Do not have the capacity to consent to study procedures
    • Are unable to complete English language questionnaires
    • Are already using an activity tracker on a daily basis (and therefore may be aware of their current level of activity)
    • Are enrolled in another study in which physical activity is a substantial part or all of the therapeutic intervention or where physical activity is specifically being evaluated and shared with patients. Patients on studies not evaluating or sharing physical activity are eligible for the present study if they meet the other inclusion/exclusion criteria and participation in the present study is not excluded by other studies in which they are enrolled.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Cuidados de apoyo
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Early Sharing Arm

early sharing of GA and OFS results to participants

Early vs. delayed sharing of GA and OFS diagnostic results and how that sharing affects patient preferences, decision- making, and satisfaction in the context of participants' cancer care.

Otros nombres:
  • evaluación geriátrica y OFS
  • Cuestionario Calidad Cantidad (QQ)
  • No terapéutico
Sin intervención: Delayed Sharing Arm

delayed sharing of GA and OFS results to participants

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Absolute change in QQ-Length of life from baseline to post-intervention
Periodo de tiempo: From baseline questionnaire at enrollment to post intervention questionnaire at an average of 4 weeks after enrollment.

The QQ uses a 5-point Likert scale to rate each of the 4 questions on the QQ-L subscale. The scores for this subscale are then summed, meaning that patients will receive a score ranging from 4-20 for the QQ-L. The total score from the 4 QQ-L items measures the strength of a participant's preference for length of life, with higher scores meaning greater preference for length of life.

From baseline questionnaire at enrollment to post intervention questionnaire at an average of 4 weeks after enrollment.

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
The secondary outcome will be the absolute change in the QQ quality of life subscale (QQ-Q) from baseline to post-intervention.
Periodo de tiempo: From baseline questionnaire at enrollment to post intervention questionnaire at an average of 4 weeks after enrollment.

The QQ uses a 5-point Likert scale to rate each of the 4 questions on the QQ-Q subscale. The scores for the subscale are then summed, meaning that patients will receive a score ranging from 4-20 for the QQ-Q. The total score from the 4 QQ-Q items measures the strength of a participant's preference for quality of life, with higher scores meaning greater preference for quality of life.

From baseline questionnaire at enrollment to post intervention questionnaire at an average of 4 weeks after enrollment.

Otras medidas de resultado

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
The proportion of patients who, on the Was It Worth It (WIWI) questionnaire, report that their treatment was worthwhile, that they would undergo it again, and that they would recommend it to others.
Periodo de tiempo: From enrollment to the end of treatment or at 3 months after study entry, whichever comes first.

The proportion of patients who, on the Was It Worth It (WIWI) questionnaire, report that their treatment was worthwhile, that they would undergo it again, and that they would recommend it to others.

From enrollment to the end of treatment or at 3 months after study entry, whichever comes first.
Summary/descriptive statistics for participants' answers to the preferences questionnaire.
Periodo de tiempo: From baseline questionnaire at enrollment to post intervention questionnaire at an average of 4 weeks after enrollment.

It inquires about their preferences for receipt, use and sharing of their assessment results, along with the degree to which receipt of these results affected their understanding or approach to their care

From baseline questionnaire at enrollment to post intervention questionnaire at an average of 4 weeks after enrollment.

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Colaboradores

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Zachary Frosch, MD, MSHP, Fox Chase Cancer Center

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

21 de febrero de 2025

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

1 de marzo de 2027

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

1 de mayo de 2027

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

15 de octubre de 2024

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

21 de octubre de 2024

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

22 de octubre de 2024

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

21 de septiembre de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

16 de septiembre de 2026

Última verificación

1 de septiembre de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Descripción del plan IPD

Individual Participant Data will not be shared due to privacy concerns.

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir