Vérification de la famille SBIR / STTR en ligne
Une technologie de santé numérique pour prévenir la violence familiale et améliorer la santé mentale des enfants
The Family Check-Up Online, a digital health intervention, was designed to improve child mental health through family-centered intervention. The Family Check-Up is grounded in over 25 years of evidence-based research and has been shown to improve child mental health and behavior including depression and conduct problems. The investigators were supported by an SBIR Phase I award (R43MH132191) to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the digital health product in schools and to adapt the product based on findings of that work. Findings from that project suggested the model is a good fit for schools, with school providers stating a need for family-centered interventions that target child behavior and mental health, but with few resources or evidence-based programs available. The research team received feedback that suggests the model should be evaluated as both an uncoached version and coached version, delivered with provider support. In the current project, the investigators plan to continue work in schools to develop the model for commercialization, including understanding the process for embedding the FCU Online into current student support systems and implementation factors that lead to maintenance of the model in schools. The investigators plan to conduct a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial to evaluate the effectiveness of the FCU Online when delivered by real world providers. Thirty providers (N=600 students/families) will be randomly assigned to receive training in the FCU Online coached vs. uncoached models. The research team will then evaluate outcomes including family relationships, parenting skills, and child mental health and behavior. The investigators predict that the FCU Online will improve child mental health and behavior, and will test for moderators such as provider training and child baseline risk. Findings will have implications for commercialization of the product in schools and implementation of the model in a range of different school settings.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
In this study the investigators propose the following specific aims:
- Examine the feasibility and acceptability of embedding the FCU Online model into multi-tiered systems of support (MTSS). The investigative team (comprised of researchers and school partners) will (1a) identify strategies to reach students at risk for poor mental health outcomes using natural indicators within the school environment. Then, the team will (1b) identify feasible and acceptable implementation strategies for delivery of the basic (i.e., no coaching) and supported (i.e., with coaching) FCU Online models as routine school services. Phase 1 data suggest that schools vary in their preference for a coached vs. uncoached delivery system. The investigators will explore the best strategies for delivery of both models in a series of interviews with N=20 school providers and N=20 parents that will guide the Aim 2 effectiveness trial.
- Conduct a comparative effectiveness trial to examine outcomes associated with the FCU Online model in school delivery systems. The investigators will examine the effectiveness of the FCU Online for middle school youth in a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial. Based on Phase 1 results, 30 school providers across multiple districts will be randomly assigned to deliver the basic (i.e., no coaching) or supported (i.e., with coaching) digital health model. Each provider will enroll 20 families/students (N=600) in the intervention across one year. The investigators will test parent and student outcomes associated with the program over a 6-month period including student mental health and behavior problems. Potential moderators of family engagement and improved outcomes, including pre-existing risk (family and student level) and provider characteristics, will be examined. The investigators hypothesize greater effects of The FCU Online with coaching for students with high baseline behavior problems and for providers with experience working with high-risk students. Moderation analysis results will highlight which students might benefit most from the FCU Online with coaching and from which providers.
- Examine factors related to successful implementation in schools that will guide future commercialization. Guided by the RE-AIM implementation framework, the investigators will evaluate factors related to Reach (percent of students who received FCU Online supports), Adoption (who engages at schools and to what extent), Implementation (fidelity monitoring and usage),and Maintenance (provider usage at end of clinical trial) of the FCU Online models. These analyses will inform commercialization and funding models for the product in school delivery systems and future plans for Phase III funding.
Type d'étude
Inscription (Estimé)
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Coordonnées de l'étude
- Nom: Allison S Caruthers, PhD
- Numéro de téléphone: 503-412-3770
- E-mail: ascaru@uoregon.edu
Sauvegarde des contacts de l'étude
- Nom: Anne M Mauricio, PhD
- Numéro de téléphone: 541-346-3630
- E-mail: amariem@uoregon.edu
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Oregon
-
Eugene, Oregon, États-Unis, 97403
- Recrutement
- Prevention Science Institute
-
Contact:
- Allison S Caruthers, PhD
- Numéro de téléphone: 503-412-3770
- E-mail: ascaru@uoregon.edu
-
Contact:
- Anne M Mauricio, PhD
- Numéro de téléphone: 541-346-3630
- E-mail: amariem@uoregon.edu
-
Chercheur principal:
- Anne M Mauricio, PhD
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
- Enfant
- Adulte
- Adulte plus âgé
Accepte les volontaires sains
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- A caregiver must have a child between the ages of 11 and 14 enrolled at a participating school;
- the caregiver must be the parent or legal guardian of the youth;
- the caregiver must have a smartphone with text messaging capability and access to email; and
- the youth must be identified by school providers as needing or being eligible for Tier 2 or Tier 3 supports or services.
Exclusion Criteria:
- the caregiver is unable to read in either English or Spanish; or
- the family is already participating in another study of the University of Oregon's Prevention Science Institute.
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: La prévention
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: FCU Online with telehealth coaching
FCU Online Digital intervention with telehealth coaching. This arm includes usage of the digital intervention plus telehealth support from a parenting coach. |
This intervention is the Family Check-Up Online plus telehealth support from a parenting coach. The Family Check-Up Online is a digital intervention that includes an assessment, computer-generated feedback, and intervention modules that focus on improving family relationships and parenting skills in order to reduce child mental health problems and to improve child self-regulation. These modules include Healthy Behaviors for Stressful Times, Positive Parenting, Rules and Consequences, Supporting School Success, and Communication. A coach based at the child's school meets with caregivers via telehealth modality to provide motivation and to help caregivers tailor the content of the modules to their specific child and family's needs. |
|
Expérimental: FCU Online
FCU Online digital intervention. This arm includes use of the digital intervention only (i.e., no telehealth coaching). |
The Family Check-Up Online is a digital intervention that includes an assessment, computer-generated feedback, and intervention modules that focus on improving family relationships and parenting skills in order to reduce child mental health problems and to improve child self-regulation. These modules include Healthy Behaviors for Stressful Times, Positive Parenting, Rules and Consequences, Supporting School Success, and Communication. |
|
Aucune intervention: Providers participating in feasibility/ acceptability interviews
School-based providers will be interviewed to help the research team identify feasible and acceptable implementation strategies for delivery of the basic and supported FCU Online models as routine school services. |
|
|
Aucune intervention: Parents participating in feasibility/ acceptability interviews
Parents of middle school-aged students will be interviewed to help the research team identify feasible and acceptable implementation strategies for delivery of the basic and supported FCU Online models as routine school services. |
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from Baseline in Child Depression (Parent report)
Délai: baseline, 6 months
|
Parents report on their child's depression using the two item PHQ-2. Scores for the individual items range from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly all) and are summed together. Higher scores indicate greater child depression. |
baseline, 6 months
|
|
Change from Baseline in Child Anxiety (Parent report)
Délai: baseline, 6 months
|
Parents report on their child's anxiety using the two item GAD-2. Scores for the individual items range from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly all) and are summed together. Higher scores indicate greater child anxiety. |
baseline, 6 months
|
|
Change from Baseline in Positive Parenting (Parent report)
Délai: baseline, 6 months
|
Parents report on their use of positive parenting skills using a modified version of the Parenting Young Children scale. Parents are asked to indicate the frequency with which they used positive parenting skills (such as encouragement and praise, relationship building, giving clear directions, and using rewards for positive behavior) over the past month using a 5-pt scale (0=Never/ 1=Rarely/ 2= Sometimes/ 3=Often/ 4=Very Often). Responses to these 10 items are summed. Higher scores indicate frequent use of positive parenting skills. |
baseline, 6 months
|
|
Change from Baseline in Rules and Consequences (Parent report)
Délai: baseline, 6 months
|
Parents report on the extent to which they enforced rules and consequences for negative behavior over the past month using a 13-item scale developed for this project. Parents are asked to indicate the frequency with which they monitored their child's behavior, set clear rules, applied logical consequences, and ignored annoying behavior using a 5-pt scale (0=Never/ 1=Rarely/ 2= Sometimes/ 3=Often/ 4=Very Often). Responses are summed and higher scores indicate more consistent use of rules and consequences. |
baseline, 6 months
|
|
Change from Baseline in Positive Communication (Parent report)
Délai: baseline, 6 months
|
Parents report on the extent to which positive communication occurred with their child over the past month using a 12-item scale developed for this project. Parents are asked to indicate the frequency with which they communicated calmly and clearly, listened to their child, and mitigated conflict using a 5-pt scale (0=Never/ 1=Rarely/ 2= Sometimes/ 3=Often/ 4=Very Often). Responses are summed and higher scores indicate more positive communication within the family. |
baseline, 6 months
|
|
Change from Baseline in Supporting School Success (Parent report)
Délai: baseline, 6 months
|
Parents report on the ways they support their child's school success over the past month using a16-item scale developed for this project. Parents are asked to indicate the frequency with which their family followed regular morning, meal, sleep, school, and homework routines using a 5-pt scale (0=Never/ 1=Almost Never/ 2= Sometimes/ 3=Frequently/ 4=Almost Always). Responses are summed, and higher scores indicate more frequent use of routines that support school success. |
baseline, 6 months
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Collaborateurs
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: Anne M Mauricio, PhD, University of Oregon
- Chercheur principal: Lisa A Reiter, PhD, Northwest Prevention Science
- Chercheur principal: Elizabeth A Stormshak, PhD, Northwest Prevention Science
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Réel)
Achèvement primaire (Estimé)
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- STUDY 00001307
- R42MH132191 (Subvention/contrat des NIH des États-Unis)
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
Description du régime IPD
External researchers will have access to de-identified, individual-level data, and members of the general public will have access to metadata, descriptive data, and summary data. External researcher requests for individual-level data must be accompanied by a signed Data Use Agreement, and researchers must document that they are working under an institution with a Federal Wide Assurance (FWA). University of Oregon Information Services staff will develop and maintain the enclave to host and provide access to de-identified study data. The data enclave will be accessible to qualified researchers through a web portal that has capabilities to send and receive data by using encrypted secure transmission protocols.
Délai de partage IPD
Individual-level data will be released 12 months after the final participant has completed a given wave of data collection. This will allow time for data cleaning, and also provides a brief window for the investigative team to analyze and publish key findings prior to sharing the data, but still makes the data available to external researchers in a timely manner. After the grant award ends, if no additional external support is available to provide access to the data, the investigators will partner with the University of Oregon Libraries to host the data enclave and provide access to the data in perpetuity.
Critères d'accès au partage IPD
External researcher requests for de-identified individual-level data must be accompanied by a signed Data Use Agreement, and researchers must document that they are working under an institution with a Federal Wide Assurance (FWA).To optimize usage of the data, the website at Northwest Prevention Science, Inc. will provide clear instructions for accessing the data.
Type d'informations de prise en charge du partage d'IPD
- PROTOCOLE D'ÉTUDE
- SÈVE
- CIF
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .