Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Box di formazione per esami clinici strutturati in emergenza (ECOX)

21 settembre 2026 aggiornato da: Nicolas RIFFET-VIDAL, University Hospital, Angers

Effetto dell'utilizzo dello strumento didattico ECOX nel pronto soccorso sugli OSCE per gli studenti di medicina: studio controllato randomizzato

This study assessed whether a training toolbox called ECOX could help medical students prepare for their objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) during an emergency medicine clerkship. The hypothesis was that adding ECOX to usual training would improve examination performance and reduce examination-related anxiety. Eight 10-week clerkship rotations at Angers University Hospital, France, were randomly assigned to usual training alone or usual training plus ECOX, with four rotations in each group. All students in a rotation received the same assignment. ECOX provided a timer and reference assessment grids for practising seven-minute encounters with real patients who agreed to participate. Students could use the toolbox throughout their clerkship. Both groups completed the same three-station examination at the end of the clerkship. Examiners were unaware of group allocation. Anxiety was assessed at the beginning of the clerkship and immediately before the final examination.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Completato

Condizioni

Intervento / Trattamento

Descrizione dettagliata

This single-center pragmatic educational trial was conducted in the Emergency Department of Angers University Hospital, France. The clerkship rotation was the unit of randomization and the medical student was the unit of analysis. Eight rotations were allocated in a 1:1 ratio in two fixed blocks of four using a sequence generated by a biostatistician in R (blockrand; seed 15). The medical school assigned students to rotations independently of the research team. The investigator enrolling students knew the allocation sequence.

Usual training included supervised clinical care, bedside teaching, simulation, and formal teaching. ECOX was offered in addition to this curriculum during intervention rotations. Students were introduced to the toolbox at rotation entry, and its use was optional. Use was recorded, but the content, duration, and quality of feedback were not assessed. No patient outcomes were collected.

Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, year of study, and previous OSCE experience. CR2 cluster-robust variance estimation with Satterthwaite degrees of freedom was introduced as a post hoc methodological improvement. Supplementary interaction, intracluster correlation, leave-one-rotation-out, and recorded-use analyses were also exploratory and post hoc.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

310

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

      • Angers, Francia, 49000
        • CHU Angers

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

18 anni e precedenti (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)

Accetta volontari sani

Sì

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Medical student in the fourth, fifth, or sixth year of study undertaking an emergency medicine clerkship at Angers University Hospital.
  • Aged 18 years or older.
  • Free and informed non-opposition obtained after written and oral information, before enrolment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to participate.
  • International exchange student, including ERASMUS students.
  • Student assigned exclusively to on-call duties.
  • Previous enrolment in this study during an earlier emergency medicine rotation.

Analysis population: attendance at the final OSCE was required to measure the primary outcome. Students absent from the final OSCE were excluded from the modified intention-to-treat analysis. For students completing more than one rotation, only the first enrolled rotation was retained.

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Altro
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Separare

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: ECOX plus usual training

Students assigned by clerkship rotation received the usual emergency medicine curriculum plus access to ECOX throughout the 10-week clerkship. ECOX supported optional, timed practice with consenting real patients, followed by review against reference assessment grids and feedback when an observer was present. Students completed the standard end-of-clerkship OSCE.

Educational intervention added to usual training for one 10-week clerkship. Two boxes, each containing a timer and approximately 30 reference grids based on French national OSCE standards, were available in the emergency department. Students received instructions at rotation entry. After obtaining the patient's verbal agreement, a student performed a seven-minute encounter without prior access to the grid, then reviewed performance against the grid. Sessions could be unobserved, observed by a peer, or supervised by a physician who was not an OSCE examiner. Immediate feedback was expected when an observer was present. Students could repeat exercises as often as they wished, with no mandatory number of sessions. Use was recorded.

Nessun intervento: Usual training alone

Students assigned by clerkship rotation received the usual emergency medicine curriculum, including supervised clinical care, bedside teaching, simulation, and formal teaching. They could use the usual preparation resources available through the faculty and emergency department. No ECOX toolbox was provided during their rotation. Students completed the same end-of-clerkship OSCE as the intervention group.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Overall end-of-clerkship objective structured clinical examination score
Lasso di tempo: At the end of the 10-week clerkship

Each student completed three OSCE stations: history taking, physical examination, and procedural skills. Raw maximum scores were 20, 12, and 16, respectively. Each station score was converted to a 0-20 scale. The overall score was the arithmetic mean of these three converted scores, with a possible range of 0-20. Higher scores indicate better performance. Overall scores were compared between randomized groups.

At the end of the 10-week clerkship

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
State anxiety immediately before the end-of-clerkship OSCE
Lasso di tempo: Immediately before the end-of-clerkship OSCE, at approximately 10 weeks

State anxiety measured with the French State-Trait Anxiety Inventory state subscale (STAI-Y1). The total score ranges from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater state anxiety. Scores immediately before the final OSCE are compared between groups.

Immediately before the end-of-clerkship OSCE, at approximately 10 weeks

Altre misure di risultato

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Overall professional behavior score at the end-of-clerkship OSCE
Lasso di tempo: At the end of the 10-week clerkship

Examiner-rated professional behavior across the three OSCE stations. Behavior is rated on a 0-2 scale: 0, poor; 1, standard; 2, excellent. The overall professional behavior score is reported on the same 0-2 scale, with higher scores indicating better professional behavior. Scores are compared between groups.

At the end of the 10-week clerkship
History-taking station score at the end-of-clerkship OSCE
Lasso di tempo: At the end of the 10-week clerkship

Score for the history-taking OSCE station. The raw score ranges from 0 to 20 and is reported on a 0-20 scale. Higher scores indicate better performance. Scores are compared between groups.

At the end of the 10-week clerkship
Physical examination station score at the end-of-clerkship OSCE
Lasso di tempo: At the end of the 10-week clerkship

Score for the physical examination OSCE station. The raw score ranges from 0 to 12 and is converted to a 0-20 scale by multiplying by 20/12. Higher scores indicate better performance. Scores are compared between groups.

At the end of the 10-week clerkship
Procedural skills station score at the end-of-clerkship OSCE
Lasso di tempo: At the end of the 10-week clerkship

Score for the procedural skills OSCE station. The raw score ranges from 0 to 16 and is converted to a 0-20 scale by multiplying by 20/16. Higher scores indicate better performance. Scores are compared between groups.

At the end of the 10-week clerkship
Professional behavior score during the history-taking station
Lasso di tempo: At the end of the 10-week clerkship

Examiner-rated professional behavior during the history-taking OSCE station, on a 0-2 scale: 0, poor; 1, standard; 2, excellent. Higher scores indicate better professional behavior. Scores are compared between groups.

At the end of the 10-week clerkship
Professional behavior score during the physical examination station
Lasso di tempo: At the end of the 10-week clerkship

Examiner-rated professional behavior during the physical examination OSCE station, on a 0-2 scale: 0, poor; 1, standard; 2, excellent. Higher scores indicate better professional behavior. Scores are compared between groups.

At the end of the 10-week clerkship
Professional behavior score during the procedural skills station
Lasso di tempo: At the end of the 10-week clerkship

Examiner-rated professional behavior during the procedural skills OSCE station, on a 0-2 scale: 0, poor; 1, standard; 2, excellent. Higher scores indicate better professional behavior. Scores are compared between groups.

At the end of the 10-week clerkship
Change in state anxiety from clerkship entry to the end-of-clerkship OSCE
Lasso di tempo: At clerkship entry and immediately before the end-of-clerkship OSCE, approximately 10 weeks later.

Change in the French State-Trait Anxiety Inventory state subscale (STAI-Y1) score, calculated as the score immediately before the final OSCE minus the score at clerkship entry. Each score ranges from 20 to 80. The change ranges from -60 to +60, with negative values indicating a reduction in anxiety. Changes are compared between groups.

At clerkship entry and immediately before the end-of-clerkship OSCE, approximately 10 weeks later.

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

7 novembre 2023

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

31 ottobre 2025

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

1 novembre 2025

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

3 novembre 2023

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

3 novembre 2023

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

9 novembre 2023

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

24 settembre 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

21 settembre 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 settembre 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • 202300116

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

INDECISO

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .