Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Safety Study of Deep Brain Stimulation to Manage Thalamic Pain Syndrome (DBS)

1 maggio 2017 aggiornato da: Andre Machado

Deep Brain Stimulation for Thalamic Pain Syndrome

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of Deep Brian Stimulation (DBS) of the ventral capsular/ventral striatal as a treatment for patients with Thalamic Pain Syndrome (TPS). The central hypothesis to be tested in this investigation is that VC/VS stimulation will modulate the affective component of TPS and, consequently, improve pain related disability.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Completato

Condizioni

Descrizione dettagliata

This is a pilot clinical study of the therapeutic benefits of ventral capsular/ventral striatal deep brain stimulation (DBS) as a treatment for 10 patients with medically refractory thalamic pain syndrome. Patients to be enrolled under this protocol will have experienced severe pain for more than six months and will be considered medically refractory. Study subjects may have undergone and failed other surgical procedures or interventional procedures. Study subjects will have chronic, medically refractory pain of disabling severity, refractory to treatment attempts with conventional medications. Patients that are enrolled in the study will have bilateral DBS surgery, with implantation of one Medtronic 3391 DBS lead on either side of the brain. These leads will then be connected at first to a single Medtronic PC pulse generator to be implanted in the infraclavicular region on one side. Once the PC pulse generator is depleted, and the patient has completed the blinded phase of the study, the PC pulse generator will be replaced for an RC pulse generator. The RC pulse generator has a battery life of 9 years and is a good option for the open label phase and for continued stimulation after the study is completed. However, the RC is not ideal for the blinded phase because patients may be able to tell if they are receiving active or sham stimulation. For this reason, patients enrolled in this study will receive, initially, the implant with the PC generator. Patients will have at least 6 months of stable chronic pain associated with TPS.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

10

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, Stati Uniti, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

21 anni e precedenti (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of thalamic pain syndrome
  • with allodynia or dysesthesia
  • with pinprick anesthesia or hypoesthesia on the affected hemibody (anesthesia dolorosa).
  • Six months or more of medically refractory severe pain (see below).
  • Pain disability reported by the pain index >30 points at the time of enrollment.
  • Average daily pain for the past 30 days reported as >5 on a 0-10 scale
  • Failure to respond adequately to at least one antidepressant, one anti-seizure medication and one oral narcotic.
  • MRI done within one year of the first visit showing a lesion that involves the posterior thalamic region or a lesion in the dorsal or ventral vicinity of the thalamus (i.e. semi oval white matter or brain stem). The lesion will be contralateral to the hemibody affected by chronic pain or will involve cortical-subcortical areas in topography consistent with sensory thalamocortical connections. This will include patients with infarcts in the territory of the middle cerebral artery. A more recent MRI may be required if the patient's condition changed within the previous year.
  • Capable of understanding and providing informed consent
  • Age ≥ 21 years
  • Women of childbearing age must be on regular use of an accepted contraceptive method(s).
  • Previous surgical procedures: Patients with severe and refractory thalamic pain syndrome may have undergone other interventional or surgical procedures, as an attempt to alleviate the thalamic pain syndrome. Surgical procedure may include blocks, spinal cord stimulation, thalamic DBS, posterior limb of the internal capsule DBS or periaqueductal gray / periventricular gray DBS, cortical stimulation, peripheral ablative procedures or cerebral ablative procedures. In this study, patients with previously implanted cortical stimulation systems, or spinal and peripheral nervous system stimulation systems may be included. However, patients with previous motor cortex stimulation must have had the cortical stimulation system before being considered a candidate for this protocol. Removal of the cortical stimulation system will not be covered under this protocol. Patients with spinal or peripheral neuromodulation system may be included in the research provided that the implanted systems are compatible with the all research protocols (including fMRI) to be performed during the research. Patients with pervious DBS implants will not be considered candidates.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not capable of understanding or providing informed consent.
  • Aphasia severe enough to limit the consent process or communication between the investigators and the patient. Patients with mild or recovering aphasia may be considered candidates at the discretion of the PI.
  • Coagulopathy. Patients will be excluded unless assessed and cleared by hematology
  • Inability to stop Coumadin or platelet anti-aggregation therapy for surgery and after surgery. Patients taking these medications will need to discuss the need/risk of continuing these medications with their physicians and the PI or study personnel may contact the treating physician(s) as well to discuss the risks of anticoagulation / antiaggregation therapy discontinuation.
  • Uncontrolled hypertension.
  • Malignancy with < 5 years life expectancy.
  • Major medical co-morbidities: end stage renal failure, heart failure, severe congestive heart disease, severe respiratory problems, liver failure or other significant medical co morbidities.
  • Major neurological disorder other than the one that led to the TPS.
  • MRI (done within one year of the first visit) with abnormalities other than those associated with the neurological disorder causing TPS.
  • Age < 21 years.
  • Pregnancy or lack of regular use of contraceptives. Patients who become pregnant after enrollment may be excluded from the study. Patients who become pregnant prior to the surgical implantation of the DBS systems will be excluded from the study.
  • Previous ablative intracranial surgery for the management of the TPS.
  • Previously implanted with deep brain stimulation system.
  • Concurrent enrolment in any other trial / study for TPS.
  • Implantable hardware not compatible with MRI or with the study.
  • Patients may be excluded from enrollment due to a condition that, in the judgment of the PI, significantly increases risk or reduces significantly the likelihood of benefit from VC/VS DBS.
  • Untreated / uncontrolled (severe at the time of enrolment) depression or other psychiatric disorder.
  • Bipolar disorder, current PTSD, severe personality disorder, active psychosis, Severe OCD.
  • Psychological co-morbidities that indicates higher risk to the patient and / or higher risk of failure.
  • Suicide attempt </= 12 months
  • Communication of a plan for suicide, prior to implant, should the study treatment fail
  • Imminent suicide risk

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione incrociata
  • Mascheramento: Triplicare

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Comparatore attivo: Treatment group
Active stimulation and programmed to the settings found to be optimal during the titration process.
Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of two groups: the Treatment Group (active stimulation and programmed to the settings found to be optimal during the titration phase) and the Control Group (sham stimulation - IPG is set to ON but the voltage is set to 0V). In order to prevent too many patients from being randomized to ON or to sham early in the study, we will use, for the first 4 patients, randomization blocks of four or six. In this fashion, the first four consecutive patients will have two patients randomized to the Treatment Group and two patients in the Control Group. In the same fashion, the final six patients will have three patients randomized to the treatment group and three patients to the control group.
Comparatore fittizio: Control group
IPG is set to ON but the voltage is set to 0V.
Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of two groups: the Treatment Group (active stimulation and programmed to the settings found to be optimal during the titration phase) and the Control Group (sham stimulation - IPG is set to ON but the voltage is set to 0V). In order to prevent too many patients from being randomized to ON or to sham early in the study, we will use, for the first 4 patients, randomization blocks of four or six. In this fashion, the first four consecutive patients will have two patients randomized to the Treatment Group and two patients in the Control Group. In the same fashion, the final six patients will have three patients randomized to the treatment group and three patients to the control group.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Number of Participants With 50% Improvement in Pain Related Disability (as Assessed by the Pain Disability Index)
Lasso di tempo: Blinded stimulation phase (3 Months)
Pain Disability Index (PDI) directly measures disability related to the main components of daily life function and has been validated for thalamic pain syndrome. Range is 0 (no disability) to 10 (worst disability). The components are Family/Home Responsibilities, Recreation, Social Activity, Sexual Behavior, Life-support Activity, Occupation, & Self-care. This is an average score of the 3 month period for each Active and Sham phase.
Blinded stimulation phase (3 Months)

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Number of Participants Who Had 50% Improvement in PDI
Lasso di tempo: 24 months post randomization follow up
A 50% improvement in pain related disability (as assessed by the pain disability index) at the end of the open label phase compared to the pre-implantation baseline. The PDI ranges from 0-10 with 0 equaling no disability and 10 equaling worst disability.
24 months post randomization follow up
Number of Participants Who Would Undergo the Procedure Again.
Lasso di tempo: End of Open Label Phase (24 months)
A positive answer from patients receiving active stimulation at the end of the open label phase of the study to the question: 'would you undergo this procedure again if you were to get the same benefits you experienced?'
End of Open Label Phase (24 months)
Number of Patient Who Had >50% Reduction in VAS.
Lasso di tempo: Baseline and 24 months
Patients report reduction in the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale Ranging from 0-10, 0 meaning no pain and 10 meaning worst pain imaginable) at the end of the open label phase (24 months post randomization f/u) compared to the pre-implantation baseline.
Baseline and 24 months

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Andre G Machado, MD, The Cleveland Clinic

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio

1 maggio 2010

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

1 agosto 2014

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

1 marzo 2016

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

19 febbraio 2010

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

19 febbraio 2010

Primo Inserito (Stima)

22 febbraio 2010

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

9 giugno 2017

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

1 maggio 2017

Ultimo verificato

1 maggio 2017

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • AGM-001
  • 1DP2OD006469-01 (Sovvenzione/contratto NIH degli Stati Uniti)

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Prove cliniche su Dolore cronico

Prove cliniche su Deep Brain Stimulation for Thalamic Pain Syndrome

Sottoscrivi