GA/Spinal vs. GA/Spinal/NMB for Operative Repair of Hip Fracture
2019年8月17日 更新者:Scott Byram MD、Loyola University
Combined General and Spinal Anesthesia vs. Combined General and Spinal Anesthesia With Neuromuscular Blockade for Operative Repair of Hip Fractures
Surgical repair of hip fractures may be performed with various anesthetic techniques, but are most commonly completed under general anesthesia (GA) or neuraxial anesthesia (NA).
Numerous prospective and retrospective studies demonstrate improved morbidity and mortality when NA is used; however, many surgeons prefer the use of GA with neuromuscular blockade (NMB) due to the perception of better operative conditions.
This study aims to compare the operative conditions obtained from the use of combined GA and spinal with NMB vs. the use of GA with spinal without NMB.
84 patients will all receive a single shot spinal and GA and then will be randomized to receive either NMB or placebo.
The fracture reduction time will be measured.
調査の概要
状態
状態
引きこもった
条件
条件
介入・治療
介入・治療
詳細な説明
Eighty-four ASA I-IV patients presenting for operative repair of an unstable intertrochanteric femur fracture will be enrolled.
This will include fractures classified according to the Orthopaedic Trauma Association / Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesisfragen (OTA/AO) classification system as 31A2.2,
31A2.3,
31A3.1, 31A3.2, and 31A3.3.15
After consent and upon arrival to the operating room, patients will be monitored and then sedated with midazolam, fentanyl, and ketamine as necessary per standard practice to facilitate lateral positioning.
Patients will be positioned with the operative side down for the spinal blockade.
Under sterile conditions, spinal anesthesia will be induced with 10mg (1.2mL) of hyperbaric 0.75% bupivicaine as per standard practice.
The patient will then be given a standard general anesthetic induction consisting of propofol, succinylcholine, fentanyl, and lidocaine.
The patient will be intubated and anesthesia will be maintained with desflurane in oxygen and air.
At the time of incision, the patient will be randomized to one of two groups.
The surgeon and the anesthesiologist will be blinded to the patient's randomization status.
Group 1 (NMB) will be given IV rocuronium 0.6mg/kg in a volume of 10cc.
Group 2 (placebo) will be given 10cc normal saline.
The anesthesia practitioner will test a Train of Four (TOF) and confirm a return of twitches prior to administering the study intervention.
The nerve stimulator will then be disconnected until the conclusion of the case.
Hemodynamic changes which suggest light anesthesia will be treated with additional fentanyl in 50mcg increments and/or increasing the desflurane concentration.
Any hypotension directly attributed to the anesthetic by the anesthetic practitioner will be managed using a phenylephrine bolus and/or infusion as per standard anesthetic practice.
Surgery will be performed by one of three fellowship trained orthopedic trauma surgeons, and fixation of these fractures will be with a single type of cephalomedullary implant (Synthes TFN-A, West Chester, PA).
These three surgeons employ an identical bed, patient position, and traction technique (sterile skeletal traction) for these procedures.
A percutaneous reduction will first be attempted.
If unsuccessful, an open reduction will then be pursued.
Following adequate reduction, fixation with the cephalomedullary implant will then be completed.
Once skin closure has been initiated, to reverse any NMB, sugammadex 200mg in 2ml will be given to those patients randomized to the NMB group, and 2mL normal saline for the placebo group.
At the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist, a nerve stimulator may be reapplied not less than 5 minutes after NMB reversal (or saline) is given.
Once the attending surgeon has evaluated the final radiographs, all patients will have their anesthetics discontinued and will be extubated after emergence from anesthesia.
研究の種類
研究の種類
介入
段階
段階
- フェーズ 4
連絡先と場所
このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。
研究場所
-
-
Illinois
-
Maywood、Illinois、アメリカ、60153
- Loyola University Medical Center
-
-
参加基準
研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。
適格基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
55年歳以上 (大人、高齢者)
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
いいえ
受講資格のある性別
全て
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- ASA I-IV Age 55 or older Scheduled for operative repair of isolated intertrochanteric hip fracture
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to consent/refusal Allergy to any of the study medications Multiple traumatic injuries Contraindication to neuraxial or general anesthesia Pregnancy
研究計画
このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:処理
- 割り当て:ランダム化
- 介入モデル:並列代入
- マスキング:トリプル
アーム数
2
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
プラセボコンパレーター:Placebo
Patients will be monitored and then sedated with midazolam, fentanyl, and ketamine as necessary per standard practice to facilitate lateral positioning.
Patients will be positioned with the operative side down for the spinal blockade.
Under sterile conditions, spinal anesthesia will be induced with 9mg (1.2mL) of hyperbaric 0.75% bupivacaine as per standard practice.
The patient will then be given a standard general anesthetic induction consisting of propofol, succinylcholine, fentanyl, and lidocaine.
At the time of incision, this group will be given 10cc normal saline.
Once skin closure has been initiated, 2mL normal saline will be administered.
|
Normal saline will be administered as a placebo in equal volume for the placebo group
|
|
アクティブコンパレータ:Neuromuscular Blockade
Patients will be monitored and then sedated with midazolam, fentanyl, and ketamine as necessary per standard practice to facilitate lateral positioning.
Patients will be positioned with the operative side down for the spinal blockade.
Under sterile conditions, spinal anesthesia will be induced with 9mg (1.2mL) of hyperbaric 0.75% bupivacaine as per standard practice.
The patient will then be given a standard general anesthetic induction consisting of propofol, succinylcholine, fentanyl, and lidocaine.
At the time of incision, this group will be given IV rocuronium 0.6mg/kg in a volume of 10cc.
Once skin closure has been initiated, sugammadex 200mg in 2ml will be administered.
|
The neuromuscular blockade group will receive intravenous rocuronium
The neuromuscular blockade group will receive intravenous sugammadex for reversal of residual rocuronium
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to complete reduction of the fracture
時間枠:Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
Time necessary for complete reduction in the operating room.
|
Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
二次結果の測定
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Surgical Operative Conditions
時間枠:Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
The surgeon's opinion of the operative conditions, as measured using a 4 point likert scale.
|
Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
|
Estimated Blood Loss
時間枠:Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
Final estimated blood loss in mL for the procedure
|
Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
|
Total operating room time
時間枠:Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
Total number of minutes spent in the operating room
|
Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
|
Time to extubation
時間枠:Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
Total time from intubation to extubation
|
Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
|
Intraoperative fentanyl use
時間枠:Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
Total amount (in mcg) of intravenous fentanyl used during the procedure
|
Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
協力者と研究者
ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。
出版物と役立つリンク
研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。
一般刊行物
- Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, McKee A, Kehlet H, van Zundert A, Sage D, Futter M, Saville G, Clark T, MacMahon S. Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. BMJ. 2000 Dec 16;321(7275):1493. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7275.1493.
- Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2006 Dec;17(12):1726-33. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0172-4. Epub 2006 Sep 16.
- Neuman MD, Silber JH, Elkassabany NM, Ludwig JM, Fleisher LA. Comparative effectiveness of regional versus general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery in adults. Anesthesiology. 2012 Jul;117(1):72-92. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182545e7c.
- Minville V, Fourcade O, Grousset D, Chassery C, Nguyen L, Asehnoune K, Colombani A, Goulmamine L, Samii K. Spinal anesthesia using single injection small-dose bupivacaine versus continuous catheter injection techniques for surgical repair of hip fracture in elderly patients. Anesth Analg. 2006 May;102(5):1559-63. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000218421.18723.cf.
- Roche JJ, Wenn RT, Sahota O, Moran CG. Effect of comorbidities and postoperative complications on mortality after hip fracture in elderly people: prospective observational cohort study. BMJ. 2005 Dec 10;331(7529):1374. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38643.663843.55. Epub 2005 Nov 18.
- Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, Broderick JS, Creevey W, DeCoster TA, Prokuski L, Sirkin MS, Ziran B, Henley B, Audige L. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma. 2007 Nov-Dec;21(10 Suppl):S1-133. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200711101-00001.
- Chu CC, Weng SF, Chen KT, Chien CC, Shieh JP, Chen JY, Wang JJ. Propensity Score-matched Comparison of Postoperative Adverse Outcomes between Geriatric Patients Given a General or a Neuraxial Anesthetic for Hip Surgery: A Population-based Study. Anesthesiology. 2015 Jul;123(1):136-47. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000695.
- Basques BA, Bohl DD, Golinvaux NS, Samuel AM, Grauer JG. General versus spinal anaesthesia for patients aged 70 years and older with a fracture of the hip. Bone Joint J. 2015 May;97-B(5):689-95. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B5.35042.
- Bulka CM, Terekhov MA, Martin BJ, Dmochowski RR, Hayes RM, Ehrenfeld JM. Nondepolarizing Neuromuscular Blocking Agents, Reversal, and Risk of Postoperative Pneumonia. Anesthesiology. 2016 Oct;125(4):647-55. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001279.
- Stewart PA, Liang SS, Li QS, Huang ML, Bilgin AB, Kim D, Phillips S. The Impact of Residual Neuromuscular Blockade, Oversedation, and Hypothermia on Adverse Respiratory Events in a Postanesthetic Care Unit: A Prospective Study of Prevalence, Predictors, and Outcomes. Anesth Analg. 2016 Oct;123(4):859-68. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001513.
- Chang CC, Lin HC, Lin HW, Lin HC. Anesthetic management and surgical site infections in total hip or knee replacement: a population-based study. Anesthesiology. 2010 Aug;113(2):279-84. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181e2c1c3.
- Zorrilla-Vaca A, Grant MC, Mathur V, Li J, Wu CL. The Impact of Neuraxial Versus General Anesthesia on the Incidence of Postoperative Surgical Site Infections Following Knee or Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):555-63. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000437.
- Mauermann WJ, Shilling AM, Zuo Z. A comparison of neuraxial block versus general anesthesia for elective total hip replacement: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2006 Oct;103(4):1018-25. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000237267.75543.59.
- Mazze RI, Fujinaga M. Postdural puncture headache after continuous spinal anesthesia with 18-gauge and 20-gauge needles. Reg Anesth. 1993 Jan-Feb;18(1):47-51.
- Holmstrom B, Laugaland K, Rawal N, Hallberg S. Combined spinal epidural block versus spinal and epidural block for orthopaedic surgery. Can J Anaesth. 1993 Jul;40(7):601-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03009695.
研究記録日
これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
研究開始
2017年7月19日
一次修了 (予想される)
一次修了
2019年8月1日
研究の完了 (予想される)
研究の完了
2020年8月1日
試験登録日
最初に提出
最初に提出
2017年5月1日
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
2017年7月19日
最初の投稿 (実際)
最初の投稿
2017年7月21日
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
投稿された最後の更新
2019年8月20日
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
2019年8月17日
最終確認日
最終確認日
2019年8月1日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
その他の研究ID番号
その他の研究ID番号
- 209397
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
いいえ
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
はい
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
いいえ
米国で製造され、米国から輸出された製品。
いいえ
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。