이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

(Cost-)Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) in Cancer Patients (BeMind)

2017년 9월 18일 업데이트: Radboud University Medical Center

(Cost-) Effectiveness of Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) in Cancer Patients: a Superiority Trial of Online and Face-to-face Treatment Versus Treatment as Usual (TAU).

Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy has been demonstrated to be effective in reducing anxiety, depression and fatigue in cancer patients. As this intervention can be offered in groups, costs are relatively low. In addition, delivering MBCT online might make the intervention more accessible and cost-effectiveness. However, more information is needed about what treatment works best for which patient.

Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate clinical and cost-effectiveness of both individual MBCT online and MBCT offered as a group training compared to TAU .

Study design: The design of the study will be a multi-centre, randomised, superiority trial, comparing MBCT online and MBCT offered as a group training with TAU. Participants in the TAU condition will be randomised to one of the treatment conditions after 3 months. Main assessments will take place at baseline (T0), post-treatment (T1), and 3 (T2) and 9 months after post-treatment (T3).

We expect the MBCT conditions to be superior to TAU in terms of improving mindfulness skills, anxiety and depressive compants, psychological well-being, rumination and fear of cancer recurrence. We also expect the MBCT to result in patients returning to work earlier, have a higher work ability and have lower medical care costs, thereby being more cost-effective than TAU.

연구 개요

상태

완전한

정황

개입 / 치료

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

245

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

  • 네덜란드
    • Gelderland
      • Nijmegen, Gelderland, 네덜란드, 6500HB
        • Radboud University Medical Centre for Mindfulness, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
    • Utrecht
      • Bilthoven, Utrecht, 네덜란드, 3723 MB
        • Helen Dowling Institute

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

18년 이상 (성인, 고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • HADS ≥ 11
  • Cancer diagnosis (at present or past)
  • Stable dose if using psychopharmacological medication for at least 3 months
  • computer literacy and acces to internet
  • capable of filling out questionnaires in Dutch

Exclusion Criteria:

  • severe psychiatric morbidity as psychoses, suicidal ideation
  • previous mindfulness-based treatment.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 치료
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 단일 그룹 할당
  • 마스킹: 하나의

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: Online MBCT
행동: Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy
This MBCT protocol consists of 8 weekly sessions of 2,5 hours each and a silent day of 6 hours of meditation practice. Similar to group MBCT, in the online MBCT group, participants will be asked to practice at home for 45 minutes, 6 days a week. They will receive files with meditation and yoga exercises to support this.
실험적: group MBCT
행동: Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy
This MBCT protocol consists of 8 weekly sessions of 2,5 hours each and a silent day of 6 hours of meditation practice. Similar to group MBCT, in the online MBCT group, participants will be asked to practice at home for 45 minutes, 6 days a week. They will receive files with meditation and yoga exercises to support this.
간섭 없음: Treatment as usual
3 months waiting list, subsequent assignment to group or online MBCT

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Change from baseline in anxiety and depressive symptoms
기간: 0 (baseline), 3 months (post intervention)
Anxiety and depressive symptoms as assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression-scale (HADS). The HADS is a self-report questionnaire that comprises 14 items measuring feelings of generalized fear and depressive symptoms. The HADS is considered a reliable and valid instrument for assessing anxiety and depression in medical patients and is sensitive to change (Herrmann, 1997; Bjelland et al., 2002). This instrument was also validated in a palliative cancer population (Akechi, 2006).
0 (baseline), 3 months (post intervention)

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Change from baseline in fear of cancer recurrence
기간: 0, 3 (post intervention), 6 (3mo follow-up) and 12 months (9mo follow-up)
Fear of cancer recurrence will be assessed with the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory (FCRI; Simard & Savard, 2009a; van der Lee et al., 2012).
0, 3 (post intervention), 6 (3mo follow-up) and 12 months (9mo follow-up)
DSM-IV Axis I mood or anxiety disorders
기간: 0, 3 (post intervention), 12 months (9mo follow-up)
DSM IV Axis I psychiatric disorder as diagnosed by a structured interview
0, 3 (post intervention), 12 months (9mo follow-up)
Change from baseline in positive mental health
기간: 0, 3 (post intervention), 6 (3mo follow-up) and 12 months (9mo follow-up)
The Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) measures positive mental health and comprises 14 items, representing various feelings of well-being. Respondents rate the frequency of every feeling in the past month on a 6-point Likert scale (never, once or twice a month, about once a week, two or three times a week, almost every day, every day). The MHC-SF contains three subscales: emotional, psychological and social well-being. MHC-SF has shown high internal and moderate test-retest reliability, convergent and discriminant validity.
0, 3 (post intervention), 6 (3mo follow-up) and 12 months (9mo follow-up)
Change from baseline in healthcare consumption
기간: 0, 3 (post intervention), 6 (3mo follow-up) and 12 months (9mo follow-up)
The TIC-P generates quantitative data about direct medical costs and indirect societal costs as a consequence of psychological/psychiatric illnesses.
0, 3 (post intervention), 6 (3mo follow-up) and 12 months (9mo follow-up)
Change from baseline in health-related quality of life
기간: 0, 3 (post intervention), 6 (3mo follow-up) and 12 months (9mo follow-up)
To measure the quality of the health status of cancer patients a validated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument will be used, the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D). This HRQoL instrument will be completed by the patient together with a researcher and is available in a validated Dutch translation (Lamers, 2005). The EQ-5D is a generic HRQoL instrument comprising five domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D index is obtained by applying predetermined weights to the five domains. This index gives a societal-based global quantification of the participant's health status on a scale ranging from 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). Participants will also be asked to rate their overall HRQoL on a visual analogue scale (EQ- 5D VAS) consisting of a vertical line ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health status) to 100 (best imaginable).
0, 3 (post intervention), 6 (3mo follow-up) and 12 months (9mo follow-up)
Change from baseline in health-related quality of life
기간: 0, 3 (post intervention), 6 (3mo follow-up) and 12 months (9mo follow-up)
In addition to the EQ-5D, the SF-12 will be administered for explorative purposes for there are indications that the SF-12 is more sensitive for changes in HRQol in populations with less severe morbidity (Johnson and Coons, 1998).
0, 3 (post intervention), 6 (3mo follow-up) and 12 months (9mo follow-up)
Change from baseline in mindfulness skills
기간: 0, 3 (post intervention), 6 (3mo follow-up) and 12 months (9mo follow-up)
The 39-item Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire has been developed as a reliable and valid comprehensive instrument for assessing different aspects of mindfulness. A Dutch 24-item short form of the FFMQ (FFMQ-SF) was developed and assessed in a sample of 376 adults with clinically relevant symptoms of depression and anxiety and cross-validated in an independent sample of patients with fibromyalgia. Confirmatory factor analyses showed good model fit for the five-factor structure of the FFMQ-SF: observing, describing, acting with awareness, nonjudging, and nonreactivity. The FFMQ-SF was related to measures of psychological symptoms, well-being, experiential avoidance, and the personality factors neuroticism and openness to experience.
0, 3 (post intervention), 6 (3mo follow-up) and 12 months (9mo follow-up)
Change from baseline in rumination
기간: 0, 3 (post intervention), 6 (3mo follow-up) and 12 months (9mo follow-up)
The rumination subscale of the RRQ assesses a neurotic self-attentiveness (i.e. recurrent, primarily past-oriented thinking about the self), which is prompted by threats, losses, of injustices to the self. Subjects rate their level of agreement of disagreement on a five-point rating scale (e.g., "I always seem to be rehashing in my mind recent things I've said or done"). There is evidence of good internal consistency (.90) and stability over a 10-month period and convergent validity. The measure in the current study was translated into Dutch using the guidelines of the International Test Commission (Hambleton, 1994). Cronbach's alphas were .88 and .90 in Sample 1, and .90 and .91 in Sample 2, respectively (Luyckx et al., 2008).
0, 3 (post intervention), 6 (3mo follow-up) and 12 months (9mo follow-up)
Change from baseline in personality assessment
기간: 0 (baseline) and 12 months (9mo follow-up)
Personality is measured with the NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI, Costa & McCrae, 1992) which consists of five domains: neuroticism, extraversion, openness, altruism, and conscientiousness.
0 (baseline) and 12 months (9mo follow-up)
Change in mindfulness skills during intervention
기간: week 2,3,4,5,6,7,8 and 9 of intervention
The Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) will be administered before each MBCT session to assess mindful attention in daily life
week 2,3,4,5,6,7,8 and 9 of intervention
Group cohesion during intervention
기간: week 4 and week 9 during intervention
We will examine self-reported individual group cohesion ratings during the MBCT training with a Dutch Group Cohesion Questionnaire that has been used in cancer patients before (May et al., 2008). The GCQ-23 uses 22 items across four scales: the bond with the group as whole, the bond with other members, cooperation within the group and the instrumental value. Each item is rated from 1 (totally disagree) to 6 (totally agree). Internal consistency of all scales was reported to range from adequate to good (0.66-0.88).
week 4 and week 9 during intervention
Working alliance during intervention
기간: week 4 and week 9 during intervention
The Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) is most often used to assess working alliance between participant and healthcare professional. We will use the Dutch translation of the short form (WAI-S, Vervaeke & Vertommen, 1996), which is closely related to the original scale and also has good psychometric and predictive quality (Busseri & Tyler, 2003). The WAI-S is a 12 item, self report questionnaire, rated on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = never to 7 = always) with three subscales: 1) agreement between participant and therapist on the goals of the therapy; 2) agreement on the rationale of the therapy addressing the problems of the participant; and 3) the quality of the interpersonal bond between the participant and the therapist.
week 4 and week 9 during intervention
Change in mood during intervention
기간: week 2,3,4,5,6,7,8 and 9 of intervention
In the current study, positive and negative affect is assessed before each MBCT session using the International Positive and Negative Affect Scale - Short Form. The cross-sample stability, internal reliability, temporal stability, crosscultural factorial invariance, and convergent and criterion-related validities of the I-PANAS-SF were examined and found to be psychometrically acceptable (Thompson, 2007).
week 2,3,4,5,6,7,8 and 9 of intervention
Change from baseline in anxiety and depressive symptoms - follow up
기간: 0, (baseline) 6 (3mo follow-up) and 12 months (9mo follow-up)
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - anxiety and depressive symptoms at follow up.
0, (baseline) 6 (3mo follow-up) and 12 months (9mo follow-up)

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

스폰서

Radboud University Medical Center

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Anne EM Speckens, MD, PhD, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

일반 간행물

유용한 링크

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작

2014년 4월 1일

기본 완료 (실제)

2016년 7월 20일

연구 완료 (실제)

2017년 5월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2014년 5월 6일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2014년 5월 12일

처음 게시됨 (추정)

2014년 5월 14일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2017년 9월 19일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2017년 9월 18일

마지막으로 확인됨

2016년 2월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

키워드

추가 관련 MeSH 약관

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • 2012.WO14.C153
  • NL46338.091.13 (레지스트리 식별자: Toetsingonline)

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy에 대한 임상 시험

유사한 임상시험 검색

스폰서 및 공동 작업자

건강 상태

약물 개입

CROs by country

CROs in Belgium

정황

희귀 질병

약물 개입

식이 보충제

스폰서 / 협력자

위치

3
구독하다