Epidural Catheter Placement Techniques by Anesthesia Residents: Success and Complications (EPİ-TECH)
Anesthesia Residents' Epidural Catheter Placement Techniques: A Prospective Observational Study on Success Rates and Complications
Studieoversikt
Status
Status
Forhold
Forhold
Intervensjon / Behandling
Intervensjon / Behandling
Detaljert beskrivelse
Studietype
Studietype
Registrering (Antatt)
Registrering
Kontakter og plasseringer
Studiekontakt
Studiekontakt
- Navn: dilara göçmen, Asst prof
- Telefonnummer: +90 216 625 4545
- E-post: dilara.gocmen@marmara.edu.tr
Studiesteder
-
-
Maltepe
-
Istanbul, Maltepe, Tyrkia (Türkiye), 34852
- Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital
-
Ta kontakt med:
- dilara göçmen, Asst prof
- Telefonnummer: +90 216 625 4545
- E-post: dilara.gocmen@marmara.edu.tr
-
-
Deltakelseskriterier
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
- Voksen
- Eldre voksen
Tar imot friske frivillige
Prøvetakingsmetode
Studiepopulasjon
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18-80 years
- ASA physical status I, II, or III
- Scheduled for elective surgery requiring perioperative epidural analgesia or anesthesia (lumbar or thoracic approach)
- Epidural catheter to be placed by a resident with ≥ 2 years of anesthesia training
Exclusion Criteria:
- Spinal deformity (scoliosis, kyphosis, or prior spinal surgery at the target level)
- Coagulopathy or anticoagulant therapy precluding neuraxial blockade
- Active infection at the insertion site or systemic infection
- Pre-existing neurological disease affecting the spinal cord or nerve roots
- Emergency surgery
- History of prior failed epidural catheterization
- Patient refusal or inability to provide written informed consent
- Local anatomical pathology precluding safe epidural access
Studieplan
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
Antall grupper / kohorter
Kohorter og intervensjoner
Gruppe / KohortGruppe / Kohort |
Intervensjon / BehandlingIntervensjon / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Loss of Resistance (LOR) Group
Patients in whom the epidural space is identified using the loss of resistance technique.
The attending resident uses a syringe filled with air or normal saline attached to the Tuohy needle hub and advances until resistance disappears upon entering the epidural space.
|
Epidural catheterization performed using an 18G Tuohy needle and standard catheter set by anesthesia residents with a minimum of two years of training, under specialist supervision.
Technique selection (LOR or HD) is at the discretion of the performing resident and is not randomized.
Andre navn:
|
|
Hanging Drop (HD) Group
Patients in whom the epidural space is identified using the hanging drop technique.
A drop of normal saline is placed at the Tuohy needle hub and observed to be aspirated inward by the negative epidural pressure as the needle tip traverses the ligamentum flavum.
|
Epidural catheterization performed using an 18G Tuohy needle and standard catheter set by anesthesia residents with a minimum of two years of training, under specialist supervision.
Technique selection (LOR or HD) is at the discretion of the performing resident and is not randomized.
Andre navn:
|
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
First-attempt success rate
Tidsramme: Time Frame: Immediately upon procedure completion
|
Defined as successful epidural space identification and catheter placement in a single Tuohy needle insertion attempt, without redirecting the needle.
|
Time Frame: Immediately upon procedure completion
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Dural puncture rate
Tidsramme: Intraoperative
|
Inadvertent dural puncture defined as free flow of cerebrospinal fluid through the Tuohy needle or epidural catheter, confirmed by visual inspection.
Recorded as yes/no by the independent observer at the time of the procedure
|
Intraoperative
|
|
Catheter Advancement Failure Rate
Tidsramme: intraoperative
|
Inability to thread the epidural catheter beyond 3 cm into the epidural space despite confirmed needle placement, necessitating needle repositioning or procedure abandonment.
Recorded as yes/no by the independent observer.
|
intraoperative
|
|
Operator-Assessed Difficulty Score
Tidsramme: Immediately after procedure completion
|
The performing resident rates the overall technical difficulty of the procedure immediately upon completion using a 5-point Likert scale: 1 = very easy, 2 = easy, 3 = moderate, 4 = difficult, 5 = very difficult.
Recorded on the standardized data collection form
|
Immediately after procedure completion
|
|
Intravascular catheter placement rate
Tidsramme: intraoperative
|
Unintentional intravascular placement defined as aspiration of blood through the epidural catheter prior to test dose administration.
Recorded as yes/no by the independent observer immediately following catheter advancement
|
intraoperative
|
|
Postoperative Pain Scores
Tidsramme: 0, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively
|
Pain intensity assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain.
Recorded at four time points: immediately upon arrival to the recovery unit (0 hours), and at 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively by the independent observer.
|
0, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively
|
|
Rate and Type of Assistance Required During Catheter Placement
Tidsramme: Intraoperative
|
The level of assistance received by the performing resident is recorded in three categories: (1) No assistance - procedure completed independently; (2) Verbal guidance only - supervising specialist provides verbal instructions without physical intervention; (3) Physical assistance - supervising specialist takes over needle or catheter manipulation partially or completely.
Recorded by the independent observer at the time of the procedure.
|
Intraoperative
|
|
First-Attempt Success Rate Stratified by Resident Seniority Level
Tidsramme: Intraoperative
|
First-attempt success rates are compared across three seniority strata defined by duration of anesthesia training: junior residents (2-3 years), intermediate residents (3-4 years), and senior residents (4 years and above).
Seniority is determined by the total duration of anesthesia specialty training at the time of the procedure.
|
Intraoperative
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker
Generelle publikasjoner
- 1. Hoffmann VL, Vercauteren MP, Vreugde JP, Hans GH, Coppejans HC, Adriaensen HA. Posterior epidural space depth: safety of the loss of resistance and hanging drop techniques. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 1999;83(5):807-811. 2. Günaydın B, Tan A, Doğru O, Mutlu M, Öztürk G, Güler HG. Comparison of spring-loaded, loss of resistance and hanging drop techniques in lumbar epidural blocks. Agri. 2012;24(1):13-18. 3. Azizov S, Okcu M, Goksu H. Could the Hanging Drop Technique Be an Alternative Method to Loss of Resistance in Cervical Epidural Injections? Pain Physician. 2025;28:217-221. 4. Tran DQH, González AP, Bernucci F, Finlayson RJ. Confirmation of Loss-of-Resistance for Epidural Analgesia. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2015;40(2):166-173. 5. Yoshida K, Tanaka S, Watanabe K. Hanging-Drop Technique Is More Suitable for Epidural Space Confirmation in Patients With Subcutaneous Emphysema After Traumatic Multiple Rib Fractures. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2023;37(12). 6. Konrad C, Schüpfer G, Wietlisbach M, Gerber H. Learning manual skills in anesthesiology: Is there a recommended number of cases for anesthetic procedures? Anesthesia & Analgesia. 1998;86(3):635-639. 7. De Oliveira GS, Glassenberg R, Chang R, Fitzgerald P, McCarthy R. Virtual airway simulation to improve dexterity among novices performing fibreoptic intubation. Anaesthesia. 2013;68(10):1053-1058. 8. Kopacz DJ, Neal JM, Pollock JE. The regional anesthesia learning curve. Regional Anesthesia. 1996;21(3):182-190. 9. Naik VN, Devito I, Halpern SH. Cusum analysis is a useful tool to assess resident proficiency at epidural anesthesia. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. 2004;51(7):703-708.
Studierekorddatoer
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart (Antatt)
Studiestart
Primær fullføring (Antatt)
Primær fullføring
Studiet fullført (Antatt)
Studiet fullført
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
Først innsendt
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Først lagt ut (Faktiske)
Først lagt ut
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)
Sist oppdatering lagt ut
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Sist bekreftet
Sist bekreftet
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Nøkkelord
Ytterligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre studie-ID-numre
Andre studie-ID-numre
- mü anesthesia
Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)
Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?
Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .