Epidural Catheter Placement Techniques by Anesthesia Residents: Success and Complications (EPİ-TECH)
Anesthesia Residents' Epidural Catheter Placement Techniques: A Prospective Observational Study on Success Rates and Complications
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Status
Condições
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
Tipo de estudo
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Estimado)
Inscrição
Contactos e Locais
Contato de estudo
Contato de estudo
- Nome: dilara göçmen, Asst prof
- Número de telefone: +90 216 625 4545
- E-mail: dilara.gocmen@marmara.edu.tr
Locais de estudo
-
-
Maltepe
-
Istanbul, Maltepe, Turquia (Türkiye), 34852
- Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital
-
Contato:
- dilara göçmen, Asst prof
- Número de telefone: +90 216 625 4545
- E-mail: dilara.gocmen@marmara.edu.tr
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
- Adulto
- Adulto mais velho
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Método de amostragem
População do estudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18-80 years
- ASA physical status I, II, or III
- Scheduled for elective surgery requiring perioperative epidural analgesia or anesthesia (lumbar or thoracic approach)
- Epidural catheter to be placed by a resident with ≥ 2 years of anesthesia training
Exclusion Criteria:
- Spinal deformity (scoliosis, kyphosis, or prior spinal surgery at the target level)
- Coagulopathy or anticoagulant therapy precluding neuraxial blockade
- Active infection at the insertion site or systemic infection
- Pre-existing neurological disease affecting the spinal cord or nerve roots
- Emergency surgery
- History of prior failed epidural catheterization
- Patient refusal or inability to provide written informed consent
- Local anatomical pathology precluding safe epidural access
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
Número de grupos/coortes
Coortes e Intervenções
Grupo / CoorteGrupo / Coorte |
Intervenção / TratamentoIntervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Loss of Resistance (LOR) Group
Patients in whom the epidural space is identified using the loss of resistance technique.
The attending resident uses a syringe filled with air or normal saline attached to the Tuohy needle hub and advances until resistance disappears upon entering the epidural space.
|
Epidural catheterization performed using an 18G Tuohy needle and standard catheter set by anesthesia residents with a minimum of two years of training, under specialist supervision.
Technique selection (LOR or HD) is at the discretion of the performing resident and is not randomized.
Outros nomes:
|
|
Hanging Drop (HD) Group
Patients in whom the epidural space is identified using the hanging drop technique.
A drop of normal saline is placed at the Tuohy needle hub and observed to be aspirated inward by the negative epidural pressure as the needle tip traverses the ligamentum flavum.
|
Epidural catheterization performed using an 18G Tuohy needle and standard catheter set by anesthesia residents with a minimum of two years of training, under specialist supervision.
Technique selection (LOR or HD) is at the discretion of the performing resident and is not randomized.
Outros nomes:
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
First-attempt success rate
Prazo: Time Frame: Immediately upon procedure completion
|
Defined as successful epidural space identification and catheter placement in a single Tuohy needle insertion attempt, without redirecting the needle.
|
Time Frame: Immediately upon procedure completion
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Dural puncture rate
Prazo: Intraoperative
|
Inadvertent dural puncture defined as free flow of cerebrospinal fluid through the Tuohy needle or epidural catheter, confirmed by visual inspection.
Recorded as yes/no by the independent observer at the time of the procedure
|
Intraoperative
|
|
Catheter Advancement Failure Rate
Prazo: intraoperative
|
Inability to thread the epidural catheter beyond 3 cm into the epidural space despite confirmed needle placement, necessitating needle repositioning or procedure abandonment.
Recorded as yes/no by the independent observer.
|
intraoperative
|
|
Operator-Assessed Difficulty Score
Prazo: Immediately after procedure completion
|
The performing resident rates the overall technical difficulty of the procedure immediately upon completion using a 5-point Likert scale: 1 = very easy, 2 = easy, 3 = moderate, 4 = difficult, 5 = very difficult.
Recorded on the standardized data collection form
|
Immediately after procedure completion
|
|
Intravascular catheter placement rate
Prazo: intraoperative
|
Unintentional intravascular placement defined as aspiration of blood through the epidural catheter prior to test dose administration.
Recorded as yes/no by the independent observer immediately following catheter advancement
|
intraoperative
|
|
Postoperative Pain Scores
Prazo: 0, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively
|
Pain intensity assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain.
Recorded at four time points: immediately upon arrival to the recovery unit (0 hours), and at 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively by the independent observer.
|
0, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively
|
|
Rate and Type of Assistance Required During Catheter Placement
Prazo: Intraoperative
|
The level of assistance received by the performing resident is recorded in three categories: (1) No assistance - procedure completed independently; (2) Verbal guidance only - supervising specialist provides verbal instructions without physical intervention; (3) Physical assistance - supervising specialist takes over needle or catheter manipulation partially or completely.
Recorded by the independent observer at the time of the procedure.
|
Intraoperative
|
|
First-Attempt Success Rate Stratified by Resident Seniority Level
Prazo: Intraoperative
|
First-attempt success rates are compared across three seniority strata defined by duration of anesthesia training: junior residents (2-3 years), intermediate residents (3-4 years), and senior residents (4 years and above).
Seniority is determined by the total duration of anesthesia specialty training at the time of the procedure.
|
Intraoperative
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Patrocinador
Publicações e links úteis
Publicações Gerais
- 1. Hoffmann VL, Vercauteren MP, Vreugde JP, Hans GH, Coppejans HC, Adriaensen HA. Posterior epidural space depth: safety of the loss of resistance and hanging drop techniques. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 1999;83(5):807-811. 2. Günaydın B, Tan A, Doğru O, Mutlu M, Öztürk G, Güler HG. Comparison of spring-loaded, loss of resistance and hanging drop techniques in lumbar epidural blocks. Agri. 2012;24(1):13-18. 3. Azizov S, Okcu M, Goksu H. Could the Hanging Drop Technique Be an Alternative Method to Loss of Resistance in Cervical Epidural Injections? Pain Physician. 2025;28:217-221. 4. Tran DQH, González AP, Bernucci F, Finlayson RJ. Confirmation of Loss-of-Resistance for Epidural Analgesia. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2015;40(2):166-173. 5. Yoshida K, Tanaka S, Watanabe K. Hanging-Drop Technique Is More Suitable for Epidural Space Confirmation in Patients With Subcutaneous Emphysema After Traumatic Multiple Rib Fractures. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2023;37(12). 6. Konrad C, Schüpfer G, Wietlisbach M, Gerber H. Learning manual skills in anesthesiology: Is there a recommended number of cases for anesthetic procedures? Anesthesia & Analgesia. 1998;86(3):635-639. 7. De Oliveira GS, Glassenberg R, Chang R, Fitzgerald P, McCarthy R. Virtual airway simulation to improve dexterity among novices performing fibreoptic intubation. Anaesthesia. 2013;68(10):1053-1058. 8. Kopacz DJ, Neal JM, Pollock JE. The regional anesthesia learning curve. Regional Anesthesia. 1996;21(3):182-190. 9. Naik VN, Devito I, Halpern SH. Cusum analysis is a useful tool to assess resident proficiency at epidural anesthesia. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. 2004;51(7):703-708.
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Estimado)
Início do estudo
Conclusão Primária (Estimado)
Conclusão Primária
Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)
Conclusão do estudo
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Primeira postagem
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última Atualização Postada
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- mü anesthesia
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .