Epidural Catheter Placement Techniques by Anesthesia Residents: Success and Complications (EPİ-TECH)
Anesthesia Residents' Epidural Catheter Placement Techniques: A Prospective Observational Study on Success Rates and Complications
Panoramica dello studio
Stato
Stato
Condizioni
Condizioni
Intervento / Trattamento
Intervento / Trattamento
Descrizione dettagliata
Tipo di studio
Tipo di studio
Iscrizione (Stimato)
Iscrizione
Contatti e Sedi
Contatto studio
Contatto studio
- Nome: dilara göçmen, Asst prof
- Numero di telefono: +90 216 625 4545
- Email: dilara.gocmen@marmara.edu.tr
Luoghi di studio
-
-
Maltepe
-
Istanbul, Maltepe, Turchia (Türkiye), 34852
- Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital
-
Contatto:
- dilara göçmen, Asst prof
- Numero di telefono: +90 216 625 4545
- Email: dilara.gocmen@marmara.edu.tr
-
-
Criteri di partecipazione
Criteri di ammissibilità
Criteri di ammissibilità
Età idonea allo studio
- Adulto
- Adulto più anziano
Accetta volontari sani
Metodo di campionamento
Popolazione di studio
Descrizione
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18-80 years
- ASA physical status I, II, or III
- Scheduled for elective surgery requiring perioperative epidural analgesia or anesthesia (lumbar or thoracic approach)
- Epidural catheter to be placed by a resident with ≥ 2 years of anesthesia training
Exclusion Criteria:
- Spinal deformity (scoliosis, kyphosis, or prior spinal surgery at the target level)
- Coagulopathy or anticoagulant therapy precluding neuraxial blockade
- Active infection at the insertion site or systemic infection
- Pre-existing neurological disease affecting the spinal cord or nerve roots
- Emergency surgery
- History of prior failed epidural catheterization
- Patient refusal or inability to provide written informed consent
- Local anatomical pathology precluding safe epidural access
Piano di studio
Come è strutturato lo studio?
Dettagli di progettazione
Numero di gruppi/coorti
Coorti e interventi
Gruppo / CoorteGruppo / Coorte |
Intervento / TrattamentoIntervento / Trattamento |
|---|---|
|
Loss of Resistance (LOR) Group
Patients in whom the epidural space is identified using the loss of resistance technique.
The attending resident uses a syringe filled with air or normal saline attached to the Tuohy needle hub and advances until resistance disappears upon entering the epidural space.
|
Epidural catheterization performed using an 18G Tuohy needle and standard catheter set by anesthesia residents with a minimum of two years of training, under specialist supervision.
Technique selection (LOR or HD) is at the discretion of the performing resident and is not randomized.
Altri nomi:
|
|
Hanging Drop (HD) Group
Patients in whom the epidural space is identified using the hanging drop technique.
A drop of normal saline is placed at the Tuohy needle hub and observed to be aspirated inward by the negative epidural pressure as the needle tip traverses the ligamentum flavum.
|
Epidural catheterization performed using an 18G Tuohy needle and standard catheter set by anesthesia residents with a minimum of two years of training, under specialist supervision.
Technique selection (LOR or HD) is at the discretion of the performing resident and is not randomized.
Altri nomi:
|
Cosa sta misurando lo studio?
Misure di risultato primarie
Misure di risultato primarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
First-attempt success rate
Lasso di tempo: Time Frame: Immediately upon procedure completion
|
Defined as successful epidural space identification and catheter placement in a single Tuohy needle insertion attempt, without redirecting the needle.
|
Time Frame: Immediately upon procedure completion
|
Misure di risultato secondarie
Misure di risultato secondarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Dural puncture rate
Lasso di tempo: Intraoperative
|
Inadvertent dural puncture defined as free flow of cerebrospinal fluid through the Tuohy needle or epidural catheter, confirmed by visual inspection.
Recorded as yes/no by the independent observer at the time of the procedure
|
Intraoperative
|
|
Catheter Advancement Failure Rate
Lasso di tempo: intraoperative
|
Inability to thread the epidural catheter beyond 3 cm into the epidural space despite confirmed needle placement, necessitating needle repositioning or procedure abandonment.
Recorded as yes/no by the independent observer.
|
intraoperative
|
|
Operator-Assessed Difficulty Score
Lasso di tempo: Immediately after procedure completion
|
The performing resident rates the overall technical difficulty of the procedure immediately upon completion using a 5-point Likert scale: 1 = very easy, 2 = easy, 3 = moderate, 4 = difficult, 5 = very difficult.
Recorded on the standardized data collection form
|
Immediately after procedure completion
|
|
Intravascular catheter placement rate
Lasso di tempo: intraoperative
|
Unintentional intravascular placement defined as aspiration of blood through the epidural catheter prior to test dose administration.
Recorded as yes/no by the independent observer immediately following catheter advancement
|
intraoperative
|
|
Postoperative Pain Scores
Lasso di tempo: 0, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively
|
Pain intensity assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain.
Recorded at four time points: immediately upon arrival to the recovery unit (0 hours), and at 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively by the independent observer.
|
0, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively
|
|
Rate and Type of Assistance Required During Catheter Placement
Lasso di tempo: Intraoperative
|
The level of assistance received by the performing resident is recorded in three categories: (1) No assistance - procedure completed independently; (2) Verbal guidance only - supervising specialist provides verbal instructions without physical intervention; (3) Physical assistance - supervising specialist takes over needle or catheter manipulation partially or completely.
Recorded by the independent observer at the time of the procedure.
|
Intraoperative
|
|
First-Attempt Success Rate Stratified by Resident Seniority Level
Lasso di tempo: Intraoperative
|
First-attempt success rates are compared across three seniority strata defined by duration of anesthesia training: junior residents (2-3 years), intermediate residents (3-4 years), and senior residents (4 years and above).
Seniority is determined by the total duration of anesthesia specialty training at the time of the procedure.
|
Intraoperative
|
Collaboratori e investigatori
Sponsor
Sponsor
Pubblicazioni e link utili
Pubblicazioni generali
- 1. Hoffmann VL, Vercauteren MP, Vreugde JP, Hans GH, Coppejans HC, Adriaensen HA. Posterior epidural space depth: safety of the loss of resistance and hanging drop techniques. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 1999;83(5):807-811. 2. Günaydın B, Tan A, Doğru O, Mutlu M, Öztürk G, Güler HG. Comparison of spring-loaded, loss of resistance and hanging drop techniques in lumbar epidural blocks. Agri. 2012;24(1):13-18. 3. Azizov S, Okcu M, Goksu H. Could the Hanging Drop Technique Be an Alternative Method to Loss of Resistance in Cervical Epidural Injections? Pain Physician. 2025;28:217-221. 4. Tran DQH, González AP, Bernucci F, Finlayson RJ. Confirmation of Loss-of-Resistance for Epidural Analgesia. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2015;40(2):166-173. 5. Yoshida K, Tanaka S, Watanabe K. Hanging-Drop Technique Is More Suitable for Epidural Space Confirmation in Patients With Subcutaneous Emphysema After Traumatic Multiple Rib Fractures. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2023;37(12). 6. Konrad C, Schüpfer G, Wietlisbach M, Gerber H. Learning manual skills in anesthesiology: Is there a recommended number of cases for anesthetic procedures? Anesthesia & Analgesia. 1998;86(3):635-639. 7. De Oliveira GS, Glassenberg R, Chang R, Fitzgerald P, McCarthy R. Virtual airway simulation to improve dexterity among novices performing fibreoptic intubation. Anaesthesia. 2013;68(10):1053-1058. 8. Kopacz DJ, Neal JM, Pollock JE. The regional anesthesia learning curve. Regional Anesthesia. 1996;21(3):182-190. 9. Naik VN, Devito I, Halpern SH. Cusum analysis is a useful tool to assess resident proficiency at epidural anesthesia. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. 2004;51(7):703-708.
Studiare le date dei record
Studia le date principali
Inizio studio (Stimato)
Inizio studio
Completamento primario (Stimato)
Completamento primario
Completamento dello studio (Stimato)
Completamento dello studio
Date di iscrizione allo studio
Primo inviato
Primo inviato
Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità
Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità
Primo Inserito (Effettivo)
Primo Inserito
Aggiornamenti dei record di studio
Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)
Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato
Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC
Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC
Ultimo verificato
Ultimo verificato
Maggiori informazioni
Termini relativi a questo studio
Parole chiave
Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi
Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio
Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio
- mü anesthesia
Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)
Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?
Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio
Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .