Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Intervenção de Exercício Remoto, Supervisionada e Individualmente Adaptada para Melhorar a Função Física em Sobreviventes de Cancro Gastroesofágico em Estádios I-III, Ensaio PRECISE (PRECISE)

3 de novembro de 2026 atualizado por: Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center

Um Estudo Piloto de uma Intervenção de Exercício Individualmente Adaptada, Supervisionada e Remotamente Entregue para Melhorar a Função Física em Sobreviventes de Cancro Gastroesofágico (Estudo PRECISE)

This clinical trial tests an individually tailored, supervised, remote exercise intervention to improve physical function for stage I-III gastroesophageal cancer survivors. Modern treatments for gastroesophageal cancer are effective at treating the cancer but are often aggressive, can be difficult for patients to tolerate, and can lead to significant debilitation and a loss of independence. Exercise is one promising intervention that could improve physical function in patients with gastroesophageal cancer after finishing systemic treatment. Home based exercise interventions in patients with cancer during and after chemotherapy can improve fatigue and function. An individually tailored, supervised, remote exercise intervention may improve physical function for stage I-III gastroesophageal cancer survivors.

Visão geral do estudo

Status

Recrutamento

Intervenção / Tratamento

Descrição detalhada

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To determine the feasibility of the exercise intervention, as measured by the percentage of participants who attend at least 80% of the exercise sessions and complete the post-intervention functional assessment.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine other measures of feasibility of the exercise intervention, including eligibility, recruitment, and achievement of exercise goals.

II. To determine the change in measures of physical function (Short Physical Performance Battery [SPPB], grip strength, Two Minute Step Test [TMST], Activities of Daily Living [ADL], and instrumental ADL) from baseline to end of study.

III. To determine the change in frailty status (Deficit Accumulation Index [DAI]) from baseline to end of study.

IV. To determine the change in measures of cognitive function (Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MOCA] and Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cognitive Function Short Form) from baseline to end of study.

V. To determine the change in anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder-7 [GAD-7]) from baseline to end of study.

VI. To determine the change in depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-8 [PHQ-8]) from baseline to end of study.

VII. To determine the change in sleep quality (Insomnia Severity Index) from baseline to end of study.

VIII. To determine the change in quality of life (Short Form [SF]-36) from baseline to end of study.

IX. To evaluate adverse events (Patient Reported Outcomes version of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [PRO-CTCAE] and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] version [v]5.0) during the study intervention.

X. To identify patient perspectives on the whether or not the study intervention was worthwhile.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine the reliability of using remote monitoring devices to measure functional health in real-time during the study intervention.

II. To determine the change in biomarkers of aging from baseline to end of study.

OUTLINE:

Patients receive access to the Moterum application and complete remotely delivered, supervised exercise sessions, over 1 hour, 3 times per week for 8 weeks. Sessions consist of both aerobic and resistance training exercises. Patients also receive written instructions and videos of strengthening exercises. Patients undergo blood sample collection throughout the study.

After completion of study intervention, patients are followed up at 6 months.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

20

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

Locais de estudo

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, Estados Unidos, 90095
        • Recrutamento
        • UCLA / Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center
        • Contato:
        • Investigador principal:
          • Jingran Ji, MD

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

18 anos e mais velhos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults ≥ 18 years old at the start of study treatment
  • Diagnosis of early-stage (Stage I, II, III) esophageal, gastroesophageal junction, or gastric cancer. Histology can be adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, or poorly differentiated carcinoma
  • Treated with at least one systemic therapy (chemotherapy or immunotherapy) and within 12 months of completing curative intent gastroesophageal cancer (GEC) treatment
  • Have evidence of physical function impairment, defined as a SPPB score of < 12) at baseline
  • Ability to understand English and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with stage I disease who underwent endoscopic resection or surgery alone without perioperative systemic therapy
  • Patients with stage IV disease or unresectable locally advanced disease taking a palliative treatment approach without a clearly defined end of treatment
  • Patients currently receiving ongoing systemic therapy for GEC or another malignancy
  • Patients who are unable to provide informed consent
  • Any other condition or pre-existing co-morbidity that would, in the Investigator's judgment, contraindicate the participation in the study due to safety concerns with study procedures
  • Currently participating in another exercise intervention research study seeking to improve functional status, alleviate frailty, muscle strength, exhaustion/fatigue, or cognitive function

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Cuidados de suporte
  • Alocação: N / D
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição de grupo único
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Supportive care (Remote exercise intervention)

Patients receive access to the Moterum application and complete remotely delivered, supervised exercise sessions, over 1 hour, 3 times per week for 8 weeks. Sessions consist of both aerobic and resistance training exercises. Patients also receive written instructions and videos of strengthening exercises. Patients undergo blood sample collection throughout the study.

Undergo blood sample collection

Outros nomes:
  • Coleta de Amostras Biológicas
  • Bioespécime coletado
  • Coleta de amostras

Ancillary studies

Ancillary studies

Ancillary studies

Receive written instructions

Outros nomes:
  • Educação para Intervenção
  • Intervenção pela Educação
  • Intervenção através da Educação
  • Intervenção, Educacional

Receive videos of strengthening exercises

Outros nomes:
  • Educação para Intervenção
  • Intervenção pela Educação
  • Intervenção através da Educação
  • Intervenção, Educacional

Compete exercise sessions

Receive access to Moterum application

Ancillary studies

Outros nomes:
  • Teste de Aptidão Física
  • Teste de função física

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Percentage of participants who attend at least 80% of the exercise sessions and complete the post-intervention functional assessment
Prazo: At 8 weeks

Will use descriptive statistics to summarize the participant population, feasibility metrics, and safety data. The study will be deemed feasible if > 60% (12 or more) of the 20 enrolled participants are retained.

At 8 weeks

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Percentagem de pacientes rastreados que se qualificam para a intervenção
Prazo: Até 16 meses
Até 16 meses
Percentagem de pacientes elegíveis que consentem em participar na intervenção
Prazo: Até 6 meses
Até 6 meses
Percentagem de participantes elegíveis que atingem os objetivos de duração e intensidade para os exercícios aeróbicos e de resistência até ao final do período de estudo
Prazo: Até 8 semanas
Até 8 semanas
Change in physical function
Prazo: From baseline to 8 weeks

Assessed via Short Physical Performance Battery. Will perform exploratory statistical comparisons between baseline and end of study endpoints using t-tests and Fisher exact tests to explore the efficacy of the exercise intervention.

From baseline to 8 weeks
Change in grip strength
Prazo: From baseline to 8 weeks

Will perform exploratory statistical comparisons between baseline and end of study endpoints using t-tests and Fisher exact tests to explore the efficacy of the exercise intervention.

From baseline to 8 weeks
Change in physical function
Prazo: From baseline to 8 weeks

Assessed via the two minute step test. Will perform exploratory statistical comparisons between baseline and end of study endpoints using t-tests and Fisher exact tests to explore the efficacy of the exercise intervention. The two-minute step test is administered by measuring the midpoint of the participant's patella and the top of their iliac crest and measuring how many times the participant's right knee can reach this point while marching in place for 2 minutes. A higher step count means a better outcome.

From baseline to 8 weeks
Change in activities of daily living
Prazo: From baseline to 8 weeks

Will perform exploratory statistical comparisons between baseline and end of study endpoints using t-tests and Fisher exact tests to explore the efficacy of the exercise intervention. The activities of daily living assessment is a calculated from the physical component score of the Short Form-36 health survey. This section consists of 10 items that assess different physical activity domains. Each item has a specific response scale which corresponds to a number. These numbers are summed and transformed into a 0-100 scale, where 0 indicates the worst health and 100 indicates the best health.

From baseline to 8 weeks
Change in instrumental activities of daily living
Prazo: From baseline to 8 weeks

Will perform exploratory statistical comparisons between baseline and end of study endpoints using t-tests and Fisher exact tests to explore the efficacy of the exercise intervention. The instrumental activities of daily living assessment is a 10 items survey that assess different physical activity domains. Each item will be rated and scored based on responses denoting level of limitation (a lot, a little, not at all). The total score ranges from 0 to 100 and higher scores means a better outcome.

From baseline to 8 weeks
Change in frailty status
Prazo: From baseline to 6 months

Assessed via Deficit Accumulation Index. Will perform exploratory statistical comparisons between baseline and end of study endpoints using t-tests and Fisher exact tests to explore the efficacy of the exercise intervention. The Deficit Accumulation Index (DAI) is a 50-item frailty index that is derived from the Cancer and Aging Research Group geriatric assessment. The DAI evaluates deficits in multiple geriatric assessment domains. Scores range from 0-1 with a score of 0.0 representing no detected deficits and 1.0 representing the maximum deficit. Based on the score, participants will be categorized into three categories of health status: robust, prefrail, or frail.

From baseline to 6 months
Change in cognitive function
Prazo: From baseline to 6 months

Assessed via Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Will perform exploratory statistical comparisons between baseline and end of study endpoints using t-tests and Fisher exact tests to explore the efficacy of the exercise intervention. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test is a series of questions and assessments to measure eight domains of cognitive function. The MoCA is score from 0-30 with lower scores indicating worse cognitive impairment. A score of <25 suggests some degree of cognitive impairment.

From baseline to 6 months
Change in cognitive function
Prazo: From baseline to 6 months

Assessed via Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Cognitive Function Short Form. Will perform exploratory statistical comparisons between baseline and end of study endpoints using t-tests and Fisher exact tests to explore the efficacy of the exercise intervention. The PROMIS Short Form v2.0 - Cognitive Function Short Form 8a provides a self-reported measure of cognitive function consisting of 8 items. Each item includes a statement related to cognitive function that the patient would rate with an attribution (very often (several times a day), often (about once a day), sometimes (two or three times), rarely (once), never) that ranges from 0-5. The items will be summed to obtain a composite score from 0-40 and higher scores indicate better cognitive function.

From baseline to 6 months
Change in quality of life
Prazo: From baseline to 6 months

Assessed via 36-Item Short Form Survey. Will perform exploratory statistical comparisons between baseline and end of study endpoints using t-tests and Fisher exact tests to explore the efficacy of the exercise intervention. The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a composite measure of quality of life that includes 36 items related to physical (10 items) and social functioning (2 items), pain (2 items), role limitations due to physical health (4 items) and emotional problems (3 items), energy/fatigue (4 items), emotional well-being (5 items), and health perceptions (6 items). Each item is scored on a 0 to 100 range, in which a high score represents a more favorable health state.

From baseline to 6 months
Change in sleep quality
Prazo: From baseline to 6 months

Assessed via Insomnia Severity Index. Will perform exploratory statistical comparisons between baseline and end of study endpoints using t-tests and Fisher exact tests to explore the efficacy of the exercise intervention. The Insomnia Severity Index is a self-rated questionnaire that assesses sleep problems over a 2-week time interval. Higher scores indicate more acute symptoms of insomnia (no clinically significant insomnia [0-7], subthreshold insomnia [8-14], moderate clinical insomnia [15-21], severe clinical insomnia [22-28]).

From baseline to 6 months
Change in anxiety
Prazo: From baseline to 6 months

Assessed via General Anxiety Disorder-7. Will perform exploratory statistical comparisons between baseline and end of study endpoints using t-tests and Fisher exact tests to explore the efficacy of the exercise intervention. The General Anxiety Disorder-7 is a 7-item questionnaire that assesses anxiety severity over a 2-week time interval. This is calculated by assigning scores of 0 (not at all), 1 (several days), 2 (more than half the days), and 3 (nearly every day) to each response. GAD-7 total score for the 7 items ranges from 0 to 21 with higher scores indicating more anxiety (minimal anxiety [0-4], mild anxiety [5-9], moderate anxiety [10-14], severe anxiety [15-21]).

From baseline to 6 months
Change in depression
Prazo: From baseline to 6 months

Assessed via Patient Health Questionnaire-8. Will perform exploratory statistical comparisons between baseline and end of study endpoints using t-tests and Fisher exact tests to explore the efficacy of the exercise intervention. The Patient Health Questionnaire-8 is an 8-item questionnaire that assesses depression over a 2-week time interval. This is calculated by assigning scores of 0 (not at all), 1 (several days), 2 (more than half the days), and 3 (nearly every day) to each response. Higher scores indicate a higher likelihood of clinical depression.

From baseline to 6 months
Incidence of adverse events
Prazo: Up to 8 weeks

Assessed via National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Will be determined at each time point per patient as the presence (yes/no) of toxicities of grade ≥ 2. Will perform exploratory statistical comparisons between baseline and end of study endpoints using t-tests and Fisher exact tests to explore the efficacy of the exercise intervention. Adverse Events (AEs) experienced will be captured as defined by the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE v5.0). After grading, each AE will be assigned an attribution by the treating clinician (unlikely, possibly, probably, or definitely related to study agent).

Up to 8 weeks
Incidence of patient reported adverse events
Prazo: Up to 8 weeks

Assessed via Patient Reported Outcomes version of CTCAE. Will perform exploratory statistical comparisons between baseline and end of study endpoints using t-tests and Fisher exact tests to explore the efficacy of the exercise intervention. Patient-reported Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) is a patient-reported outcome measurement system developed to evaluate symptomatic toxicity in patients on cancer clinical trials. Each item is scored 0-4 with higher scores indicated more severe symptoms. No total score is calculated.

Up to 8 weeks
Patient perspectives on whether or not the study intervention was worthwhile
Prazo: At 8 weeks

Assessed via Was it Worth It (WIWI) questionnaire. Will use descriptive statistics to summarize the proportion of participants who answer 'yes,' 'uncertain,' and 'no' to the items in the WIWI Questionnaire and compare responses between participants with improvement in physical function and those without, bivariately and multivariately controlling for other factors.

At 8 weeks

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Jingran Ji, MD, UCLA / Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

11 de setembro de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

1 de setembro de 2027

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

1 de setembro de 2028

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

10 de fevereiro de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

23 de fevereiro de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

27 de fevereiro de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

5 de novembro de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

3 de novembro de 2026

Última verificação

1 de novembro de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • 25-0954
  • NCI-2026-00630 (Identificador de registro: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

produto fabricado e exportado dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .