Proteção à saúde e promoção de intérpretes de linguagem de sinais por meio da implementação do Total Worker Health®
Using mixed-methods and a clinical efficacy trial design, the overall objective of this study will employ implementation strategies to adapt and evaluate a previous integrated Total Worker Health® (TWH®) program and pilot test its efficacy on sign language interpreter well-being. The central hypothesis is that interpreters in the health protection and promotion program (intervention) will demonstrate significantly improved well-being compared to those in a general health program (control).
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Real)
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Locais de estudo
-
-
New York
-
Rochester, New York, Estados Unidos, 14642
- University of Rochester Medical Center
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Bilingual in English and American Sign Language
- Certified sign language interpreter working at least 10 hours/week in any interpreter setting.
- Apparently healthy
Exclusion Criteria:
- Less than 18 year old
- Not yet certified as a sign language interpreter
- Unable to provide consent
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Solteiro
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Programa de Proteção e Promoção da Saúde
|
An adaptive integrated Total Worker Health® program. Virtual 8-week program that's been contextualized to the physical and mental health needs of sign language interpreters. It will examine biomechanics, sleep hygiene, vicarious trauma and burnout, demand-control schema, physical activity, emotional management strategies, proper nutrition and examination of worksite. |
|
Comparador Ativo: Programa Geral de Saúde
|
Virtual 8-week program that addresses participant sleep hygiene, physical activity and proper nutrition. |
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
mean change in acceptability using the Training Acceptability Rating Scale-1 (TARS-1)
Prazo: 15 to 24 months
|
TARS-1 measures acceptability using six items (1=strongly disagree; 6=strongly agree) and demonstrates good test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct and concurrent validity. The scale ranges from 6 to 36 with higher scores indicating better acceptability. |
15 to 24 months
|
|
mean change in acceptability using the Training Acceptability Rating Scale-2 (TARS-2)
Prazo: 15 to 24 months
|
TARS-2 assesses perceived impact with eight items (0=not at all; 3=a great deal) and demonstrates good face and concurrent validity. Of particular interest, TARS-2 also includes three qualitative items asking about the most helpful part of the program and any recommended changes and invites other comments. The scale ranges from 0-24 with higher scores indicating better outcomes. |
15 to 24 months
|
|
mean change in Acceptability, Feasibility, and Appropriateness Scale
Prazo: 15 to 24 months
|
This acceptability (six items), feasibility (three items), and appropriateness (five items) instrument will be used to assess whether or not the intervention efforts were successful. The 14 total items across three subscales demonstrate good to excellent internal consistency and are rated on a five-point scale (1=not at all; 5=extremely). High scores of 30, 15, and 25 and low scores of 6, 3, and 5 indicate excellent and poor acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness, respectively. |
15 to 24 months
|
|
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- work evaluation and experience
Prazo: baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
|
Work evaluation and experience is the first of five domains in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 16 total questions. Total summed scores within this section range from 23-128 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items). |
baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
|
|
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- work evaluation and experience
Prazo: baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
|
Work evaluation and experience is the first of five domains in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 16 total questions. Total scores within this section range from 23-128 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items). |
baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
|
|
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- workplace policies and culture
Prazo: baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
|
Workplace policies and culture is the second of five domains in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 14 total questions. Total scores within this section range from 12-75 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items). |
baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
|
|
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- workplace policies and culture
Prazo: baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
|
Workplace policies and culture is the second of five domains in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 14 total questions. Total scores within this section range from 12-75 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items). |
baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
|
|
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- workplace physical environment and safety climate
Prazo: baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
|
Workplace physical environment and safety climate is the third of five domains in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 10 total questions. Total scores within this section range from 14-60 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items). |
baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
|
|
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- workplace physical environment and safety climate
Prazo: baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
|
Workplace physical environment and safety climate is the third of five domains in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 10 total questions. Total scores within this section range from 14-60 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items). |
baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
|
|
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- health status
Prazo: baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
|
Health status is the fourth of five domains in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 23 total questions. There are five open text box items within this section (i.e. asking for the number of days the respondent gets high intensity physical activity). Otherwise, total scores of the Likert scale items within this section range from 24-146 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items). |
baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
|
|
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- health status
Prazo: baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
|
Health status is the fourth of five domains in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 23 total questions. There are five open text box items within this section (i.e. asking for the number of days the respondent gets high intensity physical activity). Otherwise, total scores of the Likert scale items within this section range from 24-146 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items). |
baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
|
|
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- home, community, and society
Prazo: baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
|
Home, community, and society is the final domain in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 5 total questions. Total scores within this section range from 11-65 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items). |
baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
|
|
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- home, community, and society
Prazo: baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
|
Home, community, and society is the final domain in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 5 total questions. Total scores within this section range from 11-65 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items). |
baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Colaboradores
Publicações e links úteis
Publicações Gerais
- Eriksen HR, Ihlebaek C, Mikkelsen A, Gronningsaeter H, Sandal GM, Ursin H. Improving subjective health at the worksite: a randomized controlled trial of stress management training, physical exercise and an integrated health programme. Occup Med (Lond). 2002 Oct;52(7):383-91. doi: 10.1093/occmed/52.7.383.
- Tveito TH, Eriksen HR. Integrated health programme: a workplace randomized controlled trial. J Adv Nurs. 2009 Jan;65(1):110-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04846.x. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
Conclusão Primária (Real)
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- STUDY00008720
- K01OH012441 (Concessão/Contrato do NIH dos EUA)
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .