- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06058949
Health Protection and Promotion of Sign Language Interpreters Through Implementation of Total Worker Health®
December 7, 2023 updated by: Gretchen Roman, University of Rochester
Using mixed-methods and a clinical efficacy trial design, the overall objective of this study will employ implementation strategies to adapt and evaluate a previous integrated Total Worker Health® (TWH®) program and pilot test its efficacy on sign language interpreter well-being.
The central hypothesis is that interpreters in the health protection and promotion program (intervention) will demonstrate significantly improved well-being compared to those in a general health program (control).
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
133
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Gretchen Roman, PT, DPT, PhD
- Phone Number: 585-324-4568
- Email: gretchen_roman@urmc.rochester.edu
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
Rochester, New York, United States, 14642
- University of Rochester Medical Center
-
Contact:
- Gretchen Roman, PT, DPT, PhD
- Email: gretchen_roman@urmc.rochester.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Bilingual in English and American Sign Language
- Certified sign language interpreter working at least 10 hours/week in any interpreter setting.
- Apparently healthy
Exclusion Criteria:
- Less than 18 year old
- Not yet certified as a sign language interpreter
- Unable to provide consent
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Health Protection and Promotion Program
|
An adaptive integrated Total Worker Health® program.
Virtual 8-week program that's been contextualized to the physical and mental health needs of sign language interpreters.
It will examine biomechanics, sleep hygiene, vicarious trauma and burnout, demand-control schema, physical activity, emotional management strategies, proper nutrition and examination of worksite.
|
Active Comparator: General Health Program
|
Virtual 8-week program that addresses participant sleep hygiene, physical activity and proper nutrition.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
mean change in acceptability using the Training Acceptability Rating Scale-1 (TARS-1)
Time Frame: 15 to 24 months
|
TARS-1 measures acceptability using six items (1=strongly disagree; 6=strongly agree) and demonstrates good test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct and concurrent validity.
The scale ranges from 6 to 36 with higher scores indicating better acceptability.
|
15 to 24 months
|
mean change in acceptability using the Training Acceptability Rating Scale-2 (TARS-2)
Time Frame: 15 to 24 months
|
TARS-2 assesses perceived impact with eight items (0=not at all; 3=a great deal) and demonstrates good face and concurrent validity.
Of particular interest, TARS-2 also includes three qualitative items asking about the most helpful part of the program and any recommended changes and invites other comments.
The scale ranges from 0-24 with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
|
15 to 24 months
|
mean change in Acceptability, Feasibility, and Appropriateness Scale
Time Frame: 15 to 24 months
|
This acceptability (six items), feasibility (three items), and appropriateness (five items) instrument will be used to assess whether or not the intervention efforts were successful.
The 14 total items across three subscales demonstrate good to excellent internal consistency and are rated on a five-point scale (1=not at all; 5=extremely).
High scores of 30, 15, and 25 and low scores of 6, 3, and 5 indicate excellent and poor acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness, respectively.
|
15 to 24 months
|
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- work evaluation and experience
Time Frame: baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
|
Work evaluation and experience is the first of five domains in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 16 total questions.
Total summed scores within this section range from 23-128 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items).
|
baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
|
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- work evaluation and experience
Time Frame: baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
|
Work evaluation and experience is the first of five domains in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 16 total questions.
Total scores within this section range from 23-128 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items).
|
baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
|
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- workplace policies and culture
Time Frame: baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
|
Workplace policies and culture is the second of five domains in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 14 total questions.
Total scores within this section range from 12-75 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items).
|
baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
|
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- workplace policies and culture
Time Frame: baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
|
Workplace policies and culture is the second of five domains in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 14 total questions.
Total scores within this section range from 12-75 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items).
|
baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
|
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- workplace physical environment and safety climate
Time Frame: baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
|
Workplace physical environment and safety climate is the third of five domains in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 10 total questions.
Total scores within this section range from 14-60 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items).
|
baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
|
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- workplace physical environment and safety climate
Time Frame: baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
|
Workplace physical environment and safety climate is the third of five domains in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 10 total questions.
Total scores within this section range from 14-60 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items).
|
baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
|
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- health status
Time Frame: baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
|
Health status is the fourth of five domains in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 23 total questions.
There are five open text box items within this section (i.e.
asking for the number of days the respondent gets high intensity physical activity).
Otherwise, total scores of the Likert scale items within this section range from 24-146 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items).
|
baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
|
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- health status
Time Frame: baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
|
Health status is the fourth of five domains in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 23 total questions.
There are five open text box items within this section (i.e.
asking for the number of days the respondent gets high intensity physical activity).
Otherwise, total scores of the Likert scale items within this section range from 24-146 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items).
|
baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
|
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- home, community, and society
Time Frame: baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
|
Home, community, and society is the final domain in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 5 total questions.
Total scores within this section range from 11-65 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items).
|
baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
|
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- home, community, and society
Time Frame: baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
|
Home, community, and society is the final domain in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 5 total questions.
Total scores within this section range from 11-65 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items).
|
baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Eriksen HR, Ihlebaek C, Mikkelsen A, Gronningsaeter H, Sandal GM, Ursin H. Improving subjective health at the worksite: a randomized controlled trial of stress management training, physical exercise and an integrated health programme. Occup Med (Lond). 2002 Oct;52(7):383-91. doi: 10.1093/occmed/52.7.383.
- Tveito TH, Eriksen HR. Integrated health programme: a workplace randomized controlled trial. J Adv Nurs. 2009 Jan;65(1):110-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04846.x. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
September 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 31, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 31, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 21, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 21, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
September 28, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
December 11, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 7, 2023
Last Verified
December 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY00008720
- K01OH012441 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Well-Being, Psychological
-
University of JyvaskylaAcademy of FinlandCompleted
-
Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai...RecruitingWell-Being, PsychologicalCanada
-
Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai...Not yet recruiting
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonNot yet recruiting
-
Hong Kong Metropolitan UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Larena SASNot yet recruitingWell-Being, PsychologicalFrance
-
Catholic University of the Sacred HeartCompleted
-
Heidelberg UniversityCompleted
-
Cardiff UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
FitnessGenes Ltd.Not yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on Health Protection and Promotion
-
Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)Boston University; Massachusetts General Hospital; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Brigham and Women's Hospital and other collaboratorsCompletedPhysical Activity | Sleep | Dietary Habits | Health Behavior | MSDsUnited States
-
City of Hope Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingHematopoietic and Lymphoid Cell NeoplasmUnited States
-
National Yang Ming UniversityCardinal Tien HospitalNot yet recruitingLower Urinary Tract Symptoms | Diabetes Mellitus | Sleep | Self-management | Sleep Health | Health-related Quality of Life | Conservative Management
-
Fernanda Muñoz SepúlvedaSubvención Presidencial, Ministerio de Hacienda, Chile; Centro Interuniversitario... and other collaboratorsCompletedOral Health Knowledge | Oral Health Attitudes | Oral Health Self-efficacyChile
-
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research...Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; State University of New York at...Completed
-
Unilever IsraelUnknownPersonal Experience and Personal Initiation Program | Health Prevention Activities | Impact on PatientsIsrael
-
Chinese University of Hong KongCompleted
-
University of KwaZuluCompleted
-
Northwestern UniversityNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Fox Chase Cancer Center; University of Michigan and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Sana'a UniversityCompleted