Health Protection and Promotion of Sign Language Interpreters Through Implementation of Total Worker Health®

December 7, 2023 updated by: Gretchen Roman, University of Rochester
Using mixed-methods and a clinical efficacy trial design, the overall objective of this study will employ implementation strategies to adapt and evaluate a previous integrated Total Worker Health® (TWH®) program and pilot test its efficacy on sign language interpreter well-being. The central hypothesis is that interpreters in the health protection and promotion program (intervention) will demonstrate significantly improved well-being compared to those in a general health program (control).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

133

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Bilingual in English and American Sign Language
  • Certified sign language interpreter working at least 10 hours/week in any interpreter setting.
  • Apparently healthy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Less than 18 year old
  • Not yet certified as a sign language interpreter
  • Unable to provide consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Health Protection and Promotion Program
An adaptive integrated Total Worker Health® program. Virtual 8-week program that's been contextualized to the physical and mental health needs of sign language interpreters. It will examine biomechanics, sleep hygiene, vicarious trauma and burnout, demand-control schema, physical activity, emotional management strategies, proper nutrition and examination of worksite.
Active Comparator: General Health Program
Virtual 8-week program that addresses participant sleep hygiene, physical activity and proper nutrition.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
mean change in acceptability using the Training Acceptability Rating Scale-1 (TARS-1)
Time Frame: 15 to 24 months
TARS-1 measures acceptability using six items (1=strongly disagree; 6=strongly agree) and demonstrates good test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct and concurrent validity. The scale ranges from 6 to 36 with higher scores indicating better acceptability.
15 to 24 months
mean change in acceptability using the Training Acceptability Rating Scale-2 (TARS-2)
Time Frame: 15 to 24 months
TARS-2 assesses perceived impact with eight items (0=not at all; 3=a great deal) and demonstrates good face and concurrent validity. Of particular interest, TARS-2 also includes three qualitative items asking about the most helpful part of the program and any recommended changes and invites other comments. The scale ranges from 0-24 with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
15 to 24 months
mean change in Acceptability, Feasibility, and Appropriateness Scale
Time Frame: 15 to 24 months
This acceptability (six items), feasibility (three items), and appropriateness (five items) instrument will be used to assess whether or not the intervention efforts were successful. The 14 total items across three subscales demonstrate good to excellent internal consistency and are rated on a five-point scale (1=not at all; 5=extremely). High scores of 30, 15, and 25 and low scores of 6, 3, and 5 indicate excellent and poor acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness, respectively.
15 to 24 months
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- work evaluation and experience
Time Frame: baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
Work evaluation and experience is the first of five domains in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 16 total questions. Total summed scores within this section range from 23-128 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items).
baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- work evaluation and experience
Time Frame: baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
Work evaluation and experience is the first of five domains in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 16 total questions. Total scores within this section range from 23-128 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items).
baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- workplace policies and culture
Time Frame: baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
Workplace policies and culture is the second of five domains in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 14 total questions. Total scores within this section range from 12-75 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items).
baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- workplace policies and culture
Time Frame: baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
Workplace policies and culture is the second of five domains in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 14 total questions. Total scores within this section range from 12-75 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items).
baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- workplace physical environment and safety climate
Time Frame: baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
Workplace physical environment and safety climate is the third of five domains in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 10 total questions. Total scores within this section range from 14-60 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items).
baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- workplace physical environment and safety climate
Time Frame: baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
Workplace physical environment and safety climate is the third of five domains in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 10 total questions. Total scores within this section range from 14-60 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items).
baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- health status
Time Frame: baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
Health status is the fourth of five domains in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 23 total questions. There are five open text box items within this section (i.e. asking for the number of days the respondent gets high intensity physical activity). Otherwise, total scores of the Likert scale items within this section range from 24-146 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items).
baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- health status
Time Frame: baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
Health status is the fourth of five domains in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 23 total questions. There are five open text box items within this section (i.e. asking for the number of days the respondent gets high intensity physical activity). Otherwise, total scores of the Likert scale items within this section range from 24-146 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items).
baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- home, community, and society
Time Frame: baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
Home, community, and society is the final domain in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 5 total questions. Total scores within this section range from 11-65 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items).
baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- home, community, and society
Time Frame: baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
Home, community, and society is the final domain in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 5 total questions. Total scores within this section range from 11-65 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items).
baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 21, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 28, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY00008720
  • K01OH012441 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Well-Being, Psychological

Clinical Trials on Health Protection and Promotion

3
Subscribe