此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

A Study of a Novel Investigational Drug in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients (MK-0873-012)(COMPLETED)

2015年7月29日 更新者:Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Double-Blind, 12-Week Study to Assess the Clinical Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of MK-0873 in Rheumatoid Arthritis

This study will look at whether this new drug is effective in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, and at whether it is safe and well-tolerated by participants with the disease.

研究概览

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

106

阶段

  • 阶段2

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 至 65年 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Rheumatoid arthritis, according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria, with active disease despite current medications
  • Other criteria also apply

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other major illnesses
  • Past history of certain other disorders
  • Certain prohibited medications

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:双倍的

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:MK-0873
MK-0873 1.25 mg twice daily for 12 weeks
MK-0873 1.25 mg twice daily for 12 weeks
安慰剂比较:Placebo
Matching placebo to MK-0873 1.25 mg twice daily for 12 weeks
Matching placebo to MK-0873 1.25 mg twice daily for 12 weeks

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count
大体时间:Baseline and the average of Treatment Weeks 8, 10 and 12
Swollen joint count (SJC) was determined by assessing 66 joints (33 right side, 33 left side) for swelling using the following grading system: 0=Absent, 1=Detectable synovial thickening without loss of bony contours, 2=Loss of distinctiveness of bony contours, or 3=Bulging synovial proliferation with cystic characteristics. The total number of joints graded 1, 2, or 3 were then counted to yield the SJC. SJC ranged from 1-66, with increasing score indicating greater number of swollen joints. SJC was averaged over weeks 8, 10 and 12 to yield a Treatment Period Mean. Change from Baseline = Treatment Period Mean SJC - Baseline SJC.
Baseline and the average of Treatment Weeks 8, 10 and 12

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20% Response [ACR20]
大体时间:Baseline and the average of Treatment Weeks 8, 10 and 12
Participants were categorized as meeting ACR20 criteria when they had at least 20% improvement from Baseline in tender and swollen joint counts, and improvement from Baseline in at least 3 of 5 of the following domains: Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Patient Global Assessement, Physician Global Assessment, Patient Physical Function (Disability) Score and acute-phase reactant (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate [ESR] or C-Reactive Protein [CRP]). The average percentage of participants that met the ACR20 responder criteria over Treatment Weeks 8, 10 and 12 was calculated.
Baseline and the average of Treatment Weeks 8, 10 and 12
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count
大体时间:Baseline and the average of Treatment Weeks 8, 10 and 12
Tender joint count (TJC) was to be determined by assessing 68 joints (34 right side, 34 left side) for pain using the following grading system: 0=No pain, 1=Patient states that there is pain, 2=Patient states that there is pain and winces, or 3=Patient states that there is pain, winces, and withdraws. The total number of joints graded 1, 2, or 3 were then to be counted to yield the TJC. TJC ranges from 1-68, with increasing score indicating greater number of tender joints. TJC was to be averaged over weeks 8, 10, and 12 to yield a Treatment Period Mean. Change from Baseline = Treatment Period Mean TJC - Baseline TJC.
Baseline and the average of Treatment Weeks 8, 10 and 12
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity
大体时间:The average of Treatment Weeks 8, 10 and 12
At each clinic visit, participants were to assess disease activity using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) in reponse to the question: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, mark an (X) through the line for how well you are doing." The VAS ranges from "Very Well" (0) to "Very Poor" (100). The mean score at Treatment Weeks 8, 10 and 12 was calculated. A lower score indicates a better disease activity.
The average of Treatment Weeks 8, 10 and 12
Investigator Global Assessment of Disease Activity
大体时间:Treatment Week 12
At each clinic visit, the Investigator was to make a global assessment of participant disease activity on a 5-point Likert scale with grading as follows: 1=Very well, 2=Well, 3=Fair, 4=Poor, or 5=Very poor (scale range: 1-5). A lower score indicates a more positive assessment of participant disease activity.
Treatment Week 12
Patient Global Assessment of Response to Therapy
大体时间:Treatment Week 12
Participants were to rate their overall response to the study drug on a 5-point Likert scale with grading as follows: 0=None, 1=Poor, 2=Fair, 3=Good, or 4=Excellent (scale range: 0-4). A higher score indicates a more positive response to study drug.
Treatment Week 12
Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index
大体时间:The average of Treatment Weeks 8, 10 and 12
The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index assesses participant functional ability based on 20 questions in 8 categories of functioning: dressing, rising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Responses range from 0=No disability to 3=Completely disabled. The score for each category subscale is the single response within the category with the highest score (greatest difficulty). The overall score for the Disability Index is the mean of the 8 category scores and also ranges from 0-3, with a lower score indicating less disability.
The average of Treatment Weeks 8, 10 and 12
Patient's Assessment of Pain
大体时间:Treatment Week 12
At each clinic visit, participants were to assess their amount of pain due to arthritis during the previous 48 hours on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) that ranged from "No pain" (0) to "Extreme pain" (100). A lower score indicates less pain.
Treatment Week 12
Ratio of On-treatment C-Reactive Protein to Baseline C-Reactive Protein
大体时间:Baseline and the average of Treatment Weeks 8, 10 and 12
C-reactive protein levels rise in response to inflammation in the body. The ratio of On-treatment serum C-reative protein:Baseline serum C-reactive protein was calculated to determine a treatment effect. On-treatment C-reactive protein = the mean of serum C-reactive protein levels for Treatment Weeks 8, 10 and 12. A ratio of less than 1.0 is consistent with lower inflammation and was to be considered an improvement.
Baseline and the average of Treatment Weeks 8, 10 and 12

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始

2005年1月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2005年11月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2005年11月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2005年8月2日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2005年8月19日

首次发布 (估计)

2005年8月22日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (估计)

2015年7月30日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2015年7月29日

最后验证

2015年7月1日

更多信息

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

MK-0873的临床试验

3
订阅