使用 SPI-1005 进行耳保护以防止暂时性听觉阈值偏移
SPI-1005 口服制剂预防暂时性听觉阈值漂移的安全性和有效性的第 2 期研究
研究概览
详细说明
The objective of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of SPI-1005 in the prevention of sensorineural hearing loss or temporary auditory threshold shift (TTS) using pure tone audiometry. Subjects with normal to slight hearing loss were screened on clinic visit day 1 (CV1) and after satisfying specific otologic inclusion and exclusion criteria, were enrolled and randomized to either SPI-1000 (placebo) or one of three doses of ebselen (SPI-1005): 200, 400 or 600 mg. Subjects began taking placebo or SPI-1005 by mouth for four days beginning two days prior to CV2. On CV2 subjects had their blood drawn for peak/trough analysis of ebselen and metabolites and their baseline hearing thresholds determined by audiometry. Subjects were then exposed to 100 decibels (dBA) of sound delivered from a calibrated iPod® via insert earphones for 4 continuous hours. Subjects had their hearing serially tested at 4 additional times post-noise exposure on the same day to determine their threshold shift. Subjects returned to clinic 24 hours later on CV3 and 7 days later on CV4 for additional safety and efficacy assessments including repeat audiometry. Efficacy was determined by comparing the threshold shift in an SPI-1005 treated group vs placebo.
Exposure to SPI-1005 (ebselen and the major and minor metabolites) was quantified from plasma by LC-MS/MS. The plasma values from the peak/trough sampling were taken before and after the 5th oral dose on Clinic Visit 2 (CV2) when subjects were expected to be at steady-state. Plasma selenium levels were quantified by ICP-MS prior to dosing at CV1, at CV2 during peak/trough sampling for ebselen and metabolites, and at CV4 or 5 days after the last scheduled dose.
The multi-dose safety of SPI-1005 was determined by repeated History & Physical examinations, serology (Chemistry Panel-20), hematology (CBC with differential), and radiology (chest x-rays). Safety was determined by comparing the changes in laboratory values in SPI-1005 groups vs placebo.
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
阶段
- 阶段2
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
Florida
-
Gainesville、Florida、美国、32610
- University of Florida
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
描述
纳入标准:
- 入组时身体健康。
- 每个受试者将给予参与本研究的知情同意并同意治疗方案。
- 每个受试者将接受有关听力和健康的访谈,以揭示任何听力损失、耳鸣、已知耳部病理、使用任何潜在耳毒性药物(即 利尿剂、米诺环素)。
- 在基线测试前的 24 小时期间和整个研究期间,将避免非职业性声音暴露(例如,音乐会、枪支、烟花、电动工具)。
- 受试者的生命体征(即心率、血压、呼吸、体温)在体检时处于正常范围内。
- 受试者必须在基线时进行正常的听力学评估,包括:
- 基线测听评估证实受试者具有对称性听力,双侧频率在 0.25 至 8 千赫兹 (kHz) 之间的气导阈值不低于 25 分贝听力损失 (dBHL)。
- 没有明显的阈值不对称性(即 大于 15 dB) 在任何测试频率的耳朵之间。
- 没有明显的气骨间隙(即 大于 10 分贝)
- 双侧 A 型鼓室图,定义为 -140 至 +40 dekaPascals (daPa) 范围,基于成人的 90% 范围(Margolis 和 Hunter 2000)
排除标准:
- • 在任何测试频率(250、500、1000、2000、3000、4000、6000 和 8000 Hz)下,双耳异常听力水平 > 25 dBHL 的对象。
- 在基线听力测试之前的 24 小时内暴露于任何持续时间的非职业性高水平声音(例如,音乐会、枪支、烟花、电动工具),如受试者调查问卷或体检期间所示。
- 通过耳镜检查发现的外耳病理。
- 通过耳镜检查、鼓室压测量异常或报告的中耳病史发现的中耳病理学。
- 报告的病史所揭示的内耳或听觉神经的病理学。
- 受试者主诉耳痛、压力、饱胀感或流液。
- 怀孕测试呈阳性的受试者将被排除在研究之外。
- 首席研究员可酌情排除有其他医疗/健康问题会妨碍自愿参与药物研究的受试者。
- 先前接受过任何已知的潜在耳毒性药物治疗的受试者。 这包括但不限于高剂量水杨酸盐(>2 克/天)、铂类化疗药物和氨基糖苷类抗生素,例如链霉素、庆大霉素、妥布霉素、阿米卡星、新霉素和奈替霉素。
- 目前正在使用任何潜在耳毒性药物的受试者(即 利尿剂或米诺环素)。
- 在本研究之前的六个月内接受过任何研究性治疗(药物或设备)的受试者。
- 受试者表现出或自我报告呼吸急促、喘息、咳嗽或咯血
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:预防
- 分配:随机化
- 介入模型:并行分配
- 屏蔽:四人间
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
有源比较器:SPI-1005 低剂量
200 毫克 SPI-1005,胶囊,bid,po,x4d
|
口服胶囊,200 毫克依布硒啉,每天两次,连续 4 天
其他名称:
|
|
有源比较器:SPI-1005 中剂量
400mg SPI-1005,胶囊,bid,po,x4d
|
口服胶囊,400 毫克依布硒啉,每天两次,连续 4 天
其他名称:
|
|
有源比较器:SPI-1005 高剂量
600 毫克 SPI-1005,胶囊,bid,po,x4d
|
口服胶囊,600 毫克依布硒啉,每天两次,4 天
其他名称:
|
|
安慰剂比较:安慰剂
0mg SPI-1005,胶囊,bid,po,x4d
|
口服胶囊,0 毫克依布硒啉,每天两次,4 天
其他名称:
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Temporary Threshold Shift at 4 kHz--Intent To Treat (ITT) Population
大体时间:15 minutes post Controlled Sound Challenge
|
The primary efficacy analysis was change in air conduction threshold at 4 kHz collected in the ITT Population on the day of sound exposure.
Baseline hearing thresholds were collected on Clinic Visit 2 prior to sound exposure and used in calculating the primary efficacy endpoints.
Hearing thresholds after sound exposure were collected and compared to baseline threshold to calculate change from baseline.
Threshold changes from baseline were determined for each ear, frequency, and post sound time point, then analyzed by Mixed-effects Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) methods using triply repeated measurements for each subject.
The MMRM had fixed effects for treatment, ear, frequency, and time, all 2-way interactions and the 3-way interaction treatment by-frequency-by-time plus a random effect for subject nested within treatment.
|
15 minutes post Controlled Sound Challenge
|
|
Change in Temporary Threshold Shift at 4 kHz--Per Protocol (PP) Population
大体时间:15 minutes post Controlled Sound Challenge
|
The primary efficacy analysis was change in air conduction threshold at 4 kHz collected in the PP Population on the day of sound exposure.
Baseline hearing thresholds were collected on Clinic Visit 2 prior to sound exposure and used in calculating the primary efficacy endpoints.
Hearing thresholds after sound exposure were collected and compared to baseline threshold to calculate change from baseline.
Threshold changes from baseline were determined for each ear, frequency, and post sound time point, then analyzed by Mixed-effects Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) methods using triply repeated measurements for each subject.
The MMRM had fixed effects for treatment, ear, frequency, and time, all 2-way interactions and the 3-way interaction treatment by-frequency-by-time plus a random effect for subject nested within treatment.
|
15 minutes post Controlled Sound Challenge
|
合作者和调查者
调查人员
- 首席研究员:Colleen Le Prell, PhD、University of Florida
- 研究主任:Jonathan Kil, MD、SOUND PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
出版物和有用的链接
一般刊物
- Kil J, Pierce C, Tran H, Gu R, Lynch ED. Ebselen treatment reduces noise induced hearing loss via the mimicry and induction of glutathione peroxidase. Hear Res. 2007 Apr;226(1-2):44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.08.006. Epub 2006 Oct 6.
- Pourbakht A, Yamasoba T. Ebselen attenuates cochlear damage caused by acoustic trauma. Hear Res. 2003 Jul;181(1-2):100-8. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(03)00178-3.
- Lynch ED, Gu R, Pierce C, Kil J. Ebselen-mediated protection from single and repeated noise exposure in rat. Laryngoscope. 2004 Feb;114(2):333-7. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200402000-00029.
- Lynch ED, Gu R, Pierce C, Kil J. Reduction of acute cisplatin ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity in rats by oral administration of allopurinol and ebselen. Hear Res. 2005 Mar;201(1-2):81-9. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.08.002.
- Yamasoba T, Pourbakht A, Sakamoto T, Suzuki M. Ebselen prevents noise-induced excitotoxicity and temporary threshold shift. Neurosci Lett. 2005 Jun 3;380(3):234-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.01.047. Epub 2005 Feb 1.
- Lynch ED, Kil J. Compounds for the prevention and treatment of noise-induced hearing loss. Drug Discov Today. 2005 Oct 1;10(19):1291-8. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6446(05)03561-0.
- Lynch E, Kil J. Development of Ebselen, a Glutathione Peroxidase Mimic, for the Prevention and Treatment of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. Semin Hear 2009; 30(1): 047-055
- Le Prell CG, Yang Q, Harris JG. Modification of digital music files for use in human temporary threshold shift studies. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Oct;130(4):EL142-6. doi: 10.1121/1.3630017.
- Le Prell CG, Dell S, Hensley B, Hall JW 3rd, Campbell KC, Antonelli PJ, Green GE, Miller JM, Guire K. Digital music exposure reliably induces temporary threshold shift in normal-hearing human subjects. Ear Hear. 2012 Nov-Dec;33(6):e44-58. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31825f9d89.
- Kil J, Lobarinas E, Spankovich C, Griffiths SK, Antonelli PJ, Lynch ED, Le Prell CG. Safety and efficacy of ebselen for the prevention of noise-induced hearing loss: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2017 Sep 2;390(10098):969-979. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31791-9. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
- Spankovich C, Le Prell CG. Associations between dietary quality, noise, and hearing: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2002. Int J Audiol. 2014 Nov;53(11):796-809. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2014.921340. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (估计的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.