手动轮椅使用者的运动学习方法
SCI 手动轮椅使用者轮椅推进训练的运动学习方法
研究概览
详细说明
该项目的目标是进行试点随机对照试验 (RCT),检查 (1) 改变轮椅推进技术所需的特定任务重复次数,以及 (2) 确定最有利的表面(地面或固定设备,例如作为滚轮)用于实施基于重复的手动轮椅推进训练计划。 这项研究的长期目标是尽量减少上肢疼痛和慢性过度使用损伤,并提高使用 MWC 进行日常活动的 SCI 患者的活动效率。 当前的项目目标是测试基于重复的手动轮椅推进训练计划的效果,该计划强调推荐的临床实践指南 (CPG)。 预期结果将成为证据,用于培训 MWUs 与 SCI 的正确推进技术,以预防或延迟疼痛和慢性过度使用伤害,并通过有效的轮椅推进技术最大限度地提高活动能力。 长期影响将是实施适量的基于证据的 MWC 推进训练,以促进减轻疼痛和功能障碍,降低健康成本,并延长患有 SCI 的 MWU 参与主要生活活动。
我们的研究目标是:
- 比较三个独立组(滚轮组、地上组、轮椅技能组)的轮椅推进运动学、动力学和轮椅性能变化。
- 表征基于重复的推进实践的剂量反应关系。
- 评估推进训练对生活环境中表现的长期影响。
将进行单盲试点随机对照试验。 将招募 48 名使用 MWC 且不遵循推荐的推进临床指南的 SCI 患者。 每个参与者将被随机分配到三个独立组中的一个:滚轮系统上的运动学习重复 (RG)、地面运动学习重复 (OG) 或接受常规 MWC 技能训练 (WSG) 的安慰剂对照组。 WSG 将通过接受基本的 MWC 技能培训(当前的康复护理标准)来充当安慰剂。 参与者的运动学(视频运动分析)、动力学(SmartWheel)和轮椅地面性能(轮椅推进测试)将在干预前(基线)、干预后立即(跟进)和干预后三个月( 3 个月的随访)。
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
Missouri
-
Saint Louis、Missouri、美国、63108
- Washington University School of Medicine
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
描述
纳入标准:
- 参与者年龄必须在 18 至 60 岁之间
- 由于 SCI 而行动不便,需要使用手动轮椅 (MWC)
- 能够用上肢双侧自行推进 MWC
- 计划将 MWC 用于全天至少 75% 的活动
- 住在社区
- 理解六年级或更高水平的英语
- 能够遵循多步骤说明
- 参与者必须能够独立提供知情同意
- 能够忍受独立推动轮椅 10 米
- 愿意参加 Enabling Mobility in the Community Laboratory (EMC Lab) 的三项评估和最多 13 次培训课程。
排除标准:
- 如果人们用下肢或仅用一个上肢操纵 MWC,他们将被排除在外。
- 在筛选过程中展示正确的 MWC 推进技术的个人、已经遵循 CPG 的人,或者其 MWC 位置阻止他们遵循 CPG 的人将被排除在外。
- 如果潜在参与者由于力量不平等或神经系统受累而影响稳定、直线的推进力而出现双侧不协调,也将被排除在外。 具体来说,如果某人表现出上肢力量不均导致与标记路径偏离 12 英寸,则他或她将被排除在外。
- 其他排除标准包括过去一年内有损上肢完整性或心血管并发症的手术。
- 如果根据 Wong-Baker FACES 数字疼痛量表 (FACES),上肢或全身疼痛的评分为 8/10 或更高,则潜在参与者也将被排除在外。 -此外,如果潜在参与者目前正在接受急性上肢损伤治疗、IV 期压力损伤或正在住院治疗,则他们将被排除在外。
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:治疗
- 分配:随机化
- 介入模型:并行分配
- 屏蔽:单身的
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
有源比较器:滚轮系统组 (RG)
一组在滚轮系统上执行电机学习手动轮椅推进重复。
|
他们将首先接受康复中经常使用的护理标准:一个 30 分钟的关于推荐的推进技术的教育课程,没有实施运动学习原则。
此外,他们将每 1 小时在滚轮系统上执行 750-1250 次轮椅推进重复(每周 2-3 次,持续 4-6 周),直到达到大约 10,000 次重复(10 次)。
每节课都将重点放在最小化推动力和频率,同时在推进过程中使用更长的推动行程。
|
|
有源比较器:地上组 (OG)
一组在地面上进行电机学习手动轮椅推进重复。
|
他们将首先接受康复中经常使用的护理标准:一个 30 分钟的关于推荐的推进技术的教育课程,没有实施运动学习原则。
此外,他们将每 1 小时在地面上执行 750-1250 次轮椅推进重复(每周 2-3 次,持续 4-6 周),直到达到大约 10,000 次重复(10 次)。
每节课都将重点放在最小化推动力和频率,同时在推进过程中使用更长的推动行程。
|
|
安慰剂比较:安慰剂 - 轮椅技能组 (WSG)
接受传统手动轮椅技能培训的一组。
|
他们将接受康复中经常使用的护理标准:关于推荐的推进技术的 30 分钟教育课程,但不实施运动学习原则。
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
视频动作捕捉-手轴关系变化
大体时间:基线,干预后最多 4 周和干预后 3 个月
|
将使用 3D 红外 VMC 系统(VICON,Centennial,CO)收集运动学数据。 106
VMC 系统由 14 个 Vero 2.2 数码相机组成,用于检测反射标记的位置,反射标记将连接到参与者的第三掌骨和参与者 MWC 的轮轴。
当参与者推进捕获体积时,VMC 将记录参与者的第三掌骨相对于轮椅轴的运动。
手轴关系将以厘米为单位进行测量,并在三个测试阶段进行比较。
该变量对应于 CPG 中概述的建议(在恢复过程中将手向下朝向车轴 [手-车轴关系]。
|
基线,干预后最多 4 周和干预后 3 个月
|
|
视频动作捕捉-推角变化
大体时间:基线,干预后最多 4 周和干预后 3 个月
|
将使用 3D 红外 VMC 系统(VICON,Centennial,CO)收集运动学数据。 106
VMC 系统由 14 个 Vero 2.2 数码相机组成,用于检测反射标记的位置,反射标记将连接到参与者的第三掌骨和参与者 MWC 的轮轴。
当参与者推进捕获体积时,VMC 将记录参与者的第三掌骨相对于轮椅轴的运动。
将在三个测试阶段比较推角。
此变量对应于 CPG 中概述的建议(使用更长的推压行程 [推压角度]。
|
基线,干预后最多 4 周和干预后 3 个月
|
|
轮椅推进测试(WPT)-推动次数变化
大体时间:基线,干预后最多 4 周和干预后 3 个月
|
WPT 评估 MWU 的轮椅移动性和性能。
WPT 要求 MWU 使用自选的自然速度从静态开始跨越 10 米的光滑平坦表面推进。
完成 10 米所需的推动次数将全部记录下来。
WPT 具有出色的重测信度 (r = .72-.96)、评分者间信度 (r = .80-.96) 和结构效度 (p < .04).14
从 WPT 收集的数据将有助于确定干预前后推进性能的变化,以及这些变化如何与脊髓损伤后上肢功能保护临床实践指南 (CPG) 的建议相关,以最大限度地减少在保持相同速度的同时推动。
|
基线,干预后最多 4 周和干预后 3 个月
|
|
轮椅推进测试(WPT)-完成 10 米推 Change 的时间
大体时间:基线,干预后最多 4 周和干预后 3 个月
|
WPT 评估 MWU 的轮椅移动性和性能。
WPT 要求 MWU 使用自选的自然速度从静态开始跨越 10 米的光滑平坦表面推进。
观察参与者的推进模式以及他们的手是否与推轮接触,恢复,完成 10 米的时间将被收集。
WPT 具有出色的重测信度 (r = .72-.96)、评分者间信度 (r = .80-.96) 和结构效度 (p < .04).14
从 WPT 收集的数据将有助于确定干预前后推进性能的变化,以及这些变化如何与脊髓损伤后上肢功能保护临床实践指南 (CPG) 的建议相关,以最大限度地减少在保持相同速度的同时推动。
|
基线,干预后最多 4 周和干预后 3 个月
|
|
轮椅推进测试(WPT)-时间点之间的推进模式比较类型
大体时间:基线,干预后最多 4 周和干预后 3 个月
|
WPT 评估 MWU 的轮椅移动性和性能。
WPT 要求 MWU 使用自选的自然速度从静态开始跨越 10 米的光滑平坦表面推进。
参与者的主要推进模式将被记录下来。
WPT 具有出色的重测信度 (r = .72-.96)、评分者间信度 (r = .80-.96) 和结构效度 (p < .04).14
从 WPT 收集的数据将有助于确定干预前后推进性能的变化,以及这些变化如何与脊髓损伤后上肢功能保护临床实践指南 (CPG) 的建议相关,以最大限度地减少在保持相同速度的同时推动。
|
基线,干预后最多 4 周和干预后 3 个月
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
户外推进测试-总推进次数
大体时间:基线,干预后最多 4 周和干预后 3 个月
|
参与者将被要求按照固定路线在停车场内和周围推动他们的轮椅。
这是为了评估在不同环境下推进模式可能与室内实验室环境不同。
将记录总推进计数并在受试者内部和受试者之间进行比较。
|
基线,干预后最多 4 周和干预后 3 个月
|
|
户外推进测试 - 符合临床指南的推进次数
大体时间:基线,干预后最多 4 周和干预后 3 个月
|
参与者将被要求按照固定路线在停车场内和周围推动他们的轮椅。
这是为了评估在不同环境下推进模式可能与室内实验室环境不同。
将记录推进计数并在受试者内部和受试者之间进行比较。
|
基线,干预后最多 4 周和干预后 3 个月
|
|
Outdoor Propulsion Test-Type 推进模式
大体时间:基线,干预后最多 4 周和干预后 3 个月
|
参与者将被要求按照固定路线在停车场内和周围推动他们的轮椅。
这是为了评估在不同环境下推进模式可能与室内实验室环境不同。
推进模式将被记录下来,并在受试者内部和受试者之间进行比较。
|
基线,干预后最多 4 周和干预后 3 个月
|
|
完成路线的户外推进测试时间
大体时间:基线,干预后最多 4 周和干预后 3 个月
|
参与者将被要求按照固定路线在停车场内和周围推动他们的轮椅。
这是为了评估在不同环境下推进模式可能与室内实验室环境不同。
完成路线的时间将被记录下来,并在受试者内部和受试者之间进行比较。
|
基线,干预后最多 4 周和干预后 3 个月
|
其他结果措施
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
轮椅使用者肩痛指数 (WUSPI)
大体时间:基线,干预后最多 4 周和干预后 3 个月
|
手动轮椅使用者 (MWU) 在功能活动期间肩痛的自我报告测量。
WUSPI 由 15 项问卷组成,涉及四个领域内 15 项活动期间的肩痛:转移、轮椅移动、自我护理和一般活动。
使用从 0(无痛)到 10(最痛)的 10 点视觉模拟量表来确定每次活动期间经历的疼痛强度。
WUSPI 评分(从 0 [无痛] 到 150 [最痛] 所有项目)表示参与者在功能活动期间的肩痛水平。
通过抽样长期 MWU 确定了可靠性和有效性。
WUSPI 具有出色的重测信度 (ICC = .99),3
出色的内部一致性 (α = .97),3
和适度的同时有效性 (r = -.49)。
通过将 WUSPI 与数字评分量表上的疼痛强度相关联(r = .77;
p <.003)。
|
基线,干预后最多 4 周和干预后 3 个月
|
合作者和调查者
出版物和有用的链接
一般刊物
- Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x. Erratum In: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Sep;67(9):1991.
- Bailey RR, Klaesner JW, Lang CE. An accelerometry-based methodology for assessment of real-world bilateral upper extremity activity. PLoS One. 2014 Jul 28;9(7):e103135. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103135. eCollection 2014.
- National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. (2016). Facts and Figures at a Glance. Birmingham, AL: University of Alabama at Birmingham.
- Cott CA. Client-centred rehabilitation: client perspectives. Disabil Rehabil. 2004 Dec 16;26(24):1411-22. doi: 10.1080/09638280400000237.
- Morgan KA, Engsberg JR, Gray DB. Important wheelchair skills for new manual wheelchair users: health care professional and wheelchair user perspectives. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017 Jan;12(1):28-38. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2015.1063015. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
- Cox RJ, Amsters DI, Pershouse KJ. The need for a multidisciplinary outreach service for people with spinal cord injury living in the community. Clin Rehabil. 2001 Dec;15(6):600-6. doi: 10.1191/0269215501cr453oa.
- Estores IM. The consumer's perspective and the professional literature: what do persons with spinal cord injury want? J Rehabil Res Dev. 2003 Jul-Aug;40(4 Suppl 1):93-8. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2003.08.0093.
- National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. (2015). Annual Statistical Report-Complete Public Version. Birmingham, AL: University of Alabama at Birmingham.
- Kaye, H. S., Kang, T., & LaPlante, M. P. (2002). Wheelchair use in the United States [abstract]. Disability Statistics Abstract, 23, 1-4.
- LaPlante MP, Kaye HS. Demographics and trends in wheeled mobility equipment use and accessibility in the community. Assist Technol. 2010 Spring;22(1):3-17; quiz 19. doi: 10.1080/10400430903501413.
- Kilkens OJ, Dallmeijer AJ, De Witte LP, Van Der Woude LH, Post MW. The Wheelchair Circuit: Construct validity and responsiveness of a test to assess manual wheelchair mobility in persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Mar;85(3):424-31. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.05.006.
- Kilkens OJ, Post MW, Dallmeijer AJ, van Asbeck FW, van der Woude LH. Relationship between manual wheelchair skill performance and participation of persons with spinal cord injuries 1 year after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005 May-Jun;42(3 Suppl 1):65-73. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2004.08.0093.
- Ozturk A, Ucsular FD. Effectiveness of a wheelchair skills training programme for community-living users of manual wheelchairs in Turkey: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2011 May;25(5):416-24. doi: 10.1177/0269215510386979. Epub 2010 Nov 8.
- Bernard, B. P., Cohen, A. L., Fine, L. J., Gjessing, C. C., & McGlothlin, J. D. (1997). Elements of ergonomics programs: A primer based on workplace evaluations of musculoskeletal disorders. US Department of Health and Human Services publication, (97-117).
- Kohn, J. P. (1998). Ergonomics Process Management: A Blueprint for Quality and Compliance. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
- Boninger ML, Cooper RA, Robertson RN, Rudy TE. Wrist biomechanics during two speeds of wheelchair propulsion: an analysis using a local coordinate system. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Apr;78(4):364-72. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90227-6.
- Hoover, A. E., Cooper, R. A., Dan, D., Dvorsnak, M., Cooper, R., Fitzgerald, S. G., & Boninger, M. L. (2003). Comparing driving habits of wheelchair users: Manual versus power. In Proceedings of the Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America (RESNA) 26th International Conference on Technology & Disability: Research, Design, Practice, and Policy, (pp. 19-23).
- Koontz AM, Yang Y, Boninger DS, Kanaly J, Cooper RA, Boninger ML, Dieruf K, Ewer L. Investigation of the performance of an ergonomic handrim as a pain-relieving intervention for manual wheelchair users. Assist Technol. 2006 Fall;18(2):123-43; quiz 145. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2006.10131912.
- Akbar M, Balean G, Brunner M, Seyler TM, Bruckner T, Munzinger J, Grieser T, Gerner HJ, Loew M. Prevalence of rotator cuff tear in paraplegic patients compared with controls. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Jan;92(1):23-30. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01373.
- Boninger ML, Baldwin M, Cooper RA, Koontz A, Chan L. Manual wheelchair pushrim biomechanics and axle position. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 May;81(5):608-13. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(00)90043-1.
- Collinger JL, Impink BG, Ozawa H, Boninger ML. Effect of an intense wheelchair propulsion task on quantitative ultrasound of shoulder tendons. PM R. 2010 Oct;2(10):920-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.06.007.
- Davidoff G, Werner R, Waring W. Compressive mononeuropathies of the upper extremity in chronic paraplegia. Paraplegia. 1991 Jan;29(1):17-24. doi: 10.1038/sc.1991.3.
- Finley MA, Rasch EK, Keyser RE, Rodgers MM. The biomechanics of wheelchair propulsion in individuals with and without upper-limb impairment. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004 May;41(3B):385-95. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2004.03.0385.
- Gellman H, Chandler DR, Petrasek J, Sie I, Adkins R, Waters RL. Carpal tunnel syndrome in paraplegic patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988 Apr;70(4):517-9.
- Koontz AM, Cooper RA, Boninger ML, Yang Y, Impink BG, van der Woude LH. A kinetic analysis of manual wheelchair propulsion during start-up on select indoor and outdoor surfaces. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005 Jul-Aug;42(4):447-58. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2004.08.0106.
- Mercer JL, Boninger M, Koontz A, Ren D, Dyson-Hudson T, Cooper R. Shoulder joint kinetics and pathology in manual wheelchair users. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006 Oct;21(8):781-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.04.010. Epub 2006 Jun 30.
- Richter WM, Axelson PW. Low-impact wheelchair propulsion: achievable and acceptable. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005 May-Jun;42(3 Suppl 1):21-33. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2004.06.0074.
- Robertson RN, Boninger ML, Cooper RA, Shimada SD. Pushrim forces and joint kinetics during wheelchair propulsion. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Sep;77(9):856-64. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90270-1.
- Collinger JL, Boninger ML, Koontz AM, Price R, Sisto SA, Tolerico ML, Cooper RA. Shoulder biomechanics during the push phase of wheelchair propulsion: a multisite study of persons with paraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Apr;89(4):667-76. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.052.
- Dalyan M, Cardenas DD, Gerard B. Upper extremity pain after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 1999 Mar;37(3):191-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100802.
- Nichols PJ, Norman PA, Ennis JR. Wheelchair user's shoulder? Shoulder pain in patients with spinal cord lesions. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1979;11(1):29-32.
- Sie IH, Waters RL, Adkins RH, Gellman H. Upper extremity pain in the postrehabilitation spinal cord injured patient. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992 Jan;73(1):44-8.
- Boninger ML, Cooper RA, Baldwin MA, Shimada SD, Koontz A. Wheelchair pushrim kinetics: body weight and median nerve function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Aug;80(8):910-5. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90082-5.
- Boninger ML, Koontz AM, Sisto SA, Dyson-Hudson TA, Chang M, Price R, Cooper RA. Pushrim biomechanics and injury prevention in spinal cord injury: recommendations based on CULP-SCI investigations. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005 May-Jun;42(3 Suppl 1):9-19. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2004.08.0103.
- Fay BT, Boninger ML, Fitzgerald SG, Souza AL, Cooper RA, Koontz AM. Manual wheelchair pushrim dynamics in people with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Jun;85(6):935-42. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.08.093.
- Morgan KA, Tucker SM, Klaesner JW, Engsberg JR. A motor learning approach to training wheelchair propulsion biomechanics for new manual wheelchair users: A pilot study. J Spinal Cord Med. 2017 May;40(3):304-315. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2015.1120408. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
- Paralyzed Veterans of America Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. Preservation of upper limb function following spinal cord injury: a clinical practice guideline for health-care professionals. J Spinal Cord Med. 2005;28(5):434-70. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2005.11753844. No abstract available.
- Sawatzky B, DiGiovine C, Berner T, Roesler T, Katte L. The need for updated clinical practice guidelines for preservation of upper extremities in manual wheelchair users: a position paper. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Apr;94(4):313-24. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000203.
- Boninger ML, Souza AL, Cooper RA, Fitzgerald SG, Koontz AM, Fay BT. Propulsion patterns and pushrim biomechanics in manual wheelchair propulsion. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 May;83(5):718-23. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.32455.
- Askari S, Kirby RL, Parker K, Thompson K, O'Neill J. Wheelchair propulsion test: development and measurement properties of a new test for manual wheelchair users. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Sep;94(9):1690-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.03.002. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
- MacPhee AH, Kirby RL, Coolen AL, Smith C, MacLeod DA, Dupuis DJ. Wheelchair skills training program: A randomized clinical trial of wheelchair users undergoing initial rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Jan;85(1):41-50. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00364-2.
- Kendall MB, Ungerer G, Dorsett P. Bridging the gap: transitional rehabilitation services for people with spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2003 Sep 2;25(17):1008-15. doi: 10.1080/0963828031000122285.
- Best KL, Miller WC, Routhier F. A description of manual wheelchair skills training curriculum in entry-to-practice occupational and physical therapy programs in Canada. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10(5):401-6. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.907368. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
- Fliess-Douer O, Vanlandewijck YC, Lubel Manor G, Van Der Woude LH. A systematic review of wheelchair skills tests for manual wheelchair users with a spinal cord injury: towards a standardized outcome measure. Clin Rehabil. 2010 Oct;24(10):867-86. doi: 10.1177/0269215510367981. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
- McNevin NH, Wulf G, Carlson C. Effects of attentional focus, self-control, and dyad training on motor learning: implications for physical rehabilitation. Phys Ther. 2000 Apr;80(4):373-85. doi: 10.1093/ptj/80.4.373.
- Axelson, P., Chesney, D. Y., Minkel, J., & Perr, A. (1996). The manual wheelchair training guide. Santa Cruz, CA: Pax Press.
- Kirby RL, Dupuis DJ, Macphee AH, Coolen AL, Smith C, Best KL, Newton AM, Mountain AD, Macleod DA, Bonaparte JP. The wheelchair skills test (version 2.4): measurement properties. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 May;85(5):794-804. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.07.007.
- Isaacson, M. (2011). Best practices by occupational and physical therapists performing seating and mobility evaluations. Assistive Technology, 23(1), 13-21.
- Mitchell, M., Jin, B. T., Kim, A. J., Giesbrecht, E. M., Miller, W. C. (2014). METTA: A tablet-based platform for monitored at-home training as demonstrated through the EPIC Wheels Wheelchair Skills Training Program. In Proceedings of the Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America Conference. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
- Baddeley, A. D. & Longman, D. J. A. (1978). The influence of length and frequency of training session on the rate of learning to type. Ergonomics, 21(8), 627-635.
- Karni A. The acquisition of perceptual and motor skills: a memory system in the adult human cortex. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1996 Dec;5(1-2):39-48. doi: 10.1016/s0926-6410(96)00039-0. No abstract available.
- Kitago T, Krakauer JW. Motor learning principles for neurorehabilitation. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;110:93-103. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52901-5.00008-3.
- Korman M, Raz N, Flash T, Karni A. Multiple shifts in the representation of a motor sequence during the acquisition of skilled performance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Oct 14;100(21):12492-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2035019100. Epub 2003 Oct 6.
- Rice I, Gagnon D, Gallagher J, Boninger M. Hand rim wheelchair propulsion training using biomechanical real-time visual feedback based on motor learning theory principles. J Spinal Cord Med. 2010;33(1):33-42. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2010.11689672.
- Rice IM, Pohlig RT, Gallagher JD, Boninger ML. Handrim wheelchair propulsion training effect on overground propulsion using biomechanical real-time visual feedback. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Feb;94(2):256-63. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
- Boudreau SA, Farina D, Falla D. The role of motor learning and neuroplasticity in designing rehabilitation approaches for musculoskeletal pain disorders. Man Ther. 2010 Oct;15(5):410-4. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2010.05.008. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
- Dayan E, Cohen LG. Neuroplasticity subserving motor skill learning. Neuron. 2011 Nov 3;72(3):443-54. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.10.008.
- Lang CE, Macdonald JR, Reisman DS, Boyd L, Jacobson Kimberley T, Schindler-Ivens SM, Hornby TG, Ross SA, Scheets PL. Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Oct;90(10):1692-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.04.005.
- Nudo RJ. Mechanisms for recovery of motor function following cortical damage. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006 Dec;16(6):638-44. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.10.004. Epub 2006 Nov 3.
- Karni A, Meyer G, Rey-Hipolito C, Jezzard P, Adams MM, Turner R, Ungerleider LG. The acquisition of skilled motor performance: fast and slow experience-driven changes in primary motor cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Feb 3;95(3):861-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.3.861.
- Lang CE, MacDonald JR, Gnip C. Counting repetitions: an observational study of outpatient therapy for people with hemiparesis post-stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007 Mar;31(1):3-10. doi: 10.1097/01.npt.0000260568.31746.34.
- Krebs HI, Hogan N, Hening W, Adamovich SV, Poizner H. Procedural motor learning in Parkinson's disease. Exp Brain Res. 2001 Dec;141(4):425-37. doi: 10.1007/s002210100871. Epub 2001 Oct 18.
- Mak MK, Hui-Chan CW. Cued task-specific training is better than exercise in improving sit-to-stand in patients with Parkinson's disease: A randomized controlled trial. Mov Disord. 2008 Mar 15;23(4):501-9. doi: 10.1002/mds.21509.
- Birkenmeier RL, Prager EM, Lang CE. Translating animal doses of task-specific training to people with chronic stroke in 1-hour therapy sessions: a proof-of-concept study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 Sep;24(7):620-35. doi: 10.1177/1545968310361957. Epub 2010 Apr 27.
- Kimberley TJ, Samargia S, Moore LG, Shakya JK, Lang CE. Comparison of amounts and types of practice during rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury and stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(9):851-62. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2010.02.0019.
- de Groot S, Veeger HE, Hollander AP, van der Woude LH. Influence of task complexity on mechanical efficiency and propulsion technique during learning of hand rim wheelchair propulsion. Med Eng Phys. 2005 Jan;27(1):41-9. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.08.007.
- DeGroot KK, Hollingsworth HH, Morgan KA, Morris CL, Gray DB. The influence of verbal training and visual feedback on manual wheelchair propulsion. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2009 Mar;4(2):86-94. doi: 10.1080/17483100802613685.
- Rice LA, Smith I, Kelleher AR, Greenwald K, Boninger ML. Impact of a wheelchair education protocol based on practice guidelines for preservation of upper-limb function: a randomized trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Jan;95(1):10-19.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.06.028. Epub 2013 Jul 13.
- Zwinkels M, Verschuren O, Janssen TW, Ketelaar M, Takken T; Sport-2-Stay-Fit study group; Sport-2-Stay-Fit study group. Exercise training programs to improve hand rim wheelchair propulsion capacity: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2014 Sep;28(9):847-61. doi: 10.1177/0269215514525181. Epub 2014 Mar 10.
- Rodgers MM, Keyser RE, Rasch EK, Gorman PH, Russell PJ. Influence of training on biomechanics of wheelchair propulsion. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2001 Sep-Oct;38(5):505-11.
- de Groot S, de Bruin M, Noomen SP, van der Woude LH. Mechanical efficiency and propulsion technique after 7 weeks of low-intensity wheelchair training. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008 May;23(4):434-41. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.11.001. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
- Kotajarvi BR, Basford JR, An KN, Morrow DA, Kaufman KR. The effect of visual biofeedback on the propulsion effectiveness of experienced wheelchair users. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Apr;87(4):510-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.12.033.
- Klaesner J, Morgan KA, Gray DB. The development of an instrumented wheelchair propulsion testing and training device. Assist Technol. 2014 Spring;26(1):24-32. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2013.792020.
- Kwarciak AM, Turner JT, Guo L, Richter WM. Comparing handrim biomechanics for treadmill and overground wheelchair propulsion. Spinal Cord. 2011 Mar;49(3):457-62. doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.149. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
- Stephens CL, Engsberg JR. Comparison of overground and treadmill propulsion patterns of manual wheelchair users with tetraplegia. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5(6):420-7. doi: 10.3109/17483101003793420.
- DiGiovine CP, Cooper RA, Boninger ML. Dynamic calibration of a wheelchair dynamometer. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2001 Jan-Feb;38(1):41-55.
- Best KL, Routhier F, Miller WC. A description of manual wheelchair skills training: current practices in Canadian rehabilitation centers. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10(5):393-400. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.907367. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
- Kilkens OJ, Post MW, Dallmeijer AJ, Seelen HA, van der Woude LH. Wheelchair skills tests: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2003 Jul;17(4):418-30. doi: 10.1191/0269215503cr633oa.
- Belmont PJ, Owens BD, Schoenfeld AJ. Musculoskeletal Injuries in Iraq and Afghanistan: Epidemiology and Outcomes Following a Decade of War. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016 Jun;24(6):341-8. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00123.
- Blair JA, Patzkowski JC, Schoenfeld AJ, Cross Rivera JD, Grenier ES, Lehman RA Jr, Hsu JR; Skeletal Trauma Research Consortium (STReC). Spinal column injuries among Americans in the global war on terrorism. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Sep 19;94(18):e135(1-9). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00502.
- Blackbourne LH. Combat damage control surgery. Crit Care Med. 2008 Jul;36(7 Suppl):S304-10. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31817e2854.
- Ma VY, Chan L, Carruthers KJ. Incidence, prevalence, costs, and impact on disability of common conditions requiring rehabilitation in the United States: stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, limb loss, and back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 May;95(5):986-995.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.10.032. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
- National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. (2016). Spinal Cord Injury Data Sheet. Birmingham: University of Alabama at Birmingham.
- Finley MA, Rodgers MM. Prevalence and identification of shoulder pathology in athletic and nonathletic wheelchair users with shoulder pain: A pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004 May;41(3B):395-402. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2003.02.0022.
- Fritz HA, Lysack C, Luborsky MR, Messinger SD. Long-term community reintegration: concepts, outcomes and dilemmas in the case of a military service member with a spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(16):1501-7. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.967415. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
- Krahn GL, Suzuki R, Horner-Johnson W. Self-rated health in persons with spinal cord injury: relationship of secondary conditions, function and health status. Qual Life Res. 2009 Jun;18(5):575-84. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9477-z. Epub 2009 Apr 19.
- Plach HL, Sells CH. Occupational performance needs of young veterans. Am J Occup Ther. 2013 Jan-Feb;67(1):73-81. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2013.003871.
- Walker KA, Morgan KA, Morris CL, DeGroot KK, Hollingsworth HH, Gray DB. Development of a community mobility skills course for people who use mobility devices. Am J Occup Ther. 2010 Jul-Aug;64(4):547-54. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2010.08117.
- Goins AM, Morgan K, Stephens CL, Engsberg JR. Elbow kinematics during overground manual wheelchair propulsion in individuals with tetraplegia. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6(4):312-9. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2010.528143. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
- Julien MC, Morgan K, Stephens CL, Standeven J, Engsberg J. Trunk and neck kinematics during overground manual wheelchair propulsion in persons with tetraplegia. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014 May;9(3):213-8. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2013.775362. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
- Will, K., Engsberg, J. R., Foreman, M., Klaesner, J., Birkenmeier, R., & Morgan, K. A. (2015). Repetition based training for efficient propulsion in new manual wheelchair users. Journal of Physical Medicine, Rehabilitation & Disabilities, 1(001), 1-9.
- Flaherty E. Using pain-rating scales with older adults. Am J Nurs. 2008 Jun;108(6):40-7; quiz 48. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000324375.02027.9f. No abstract available.
- SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
- Gray DB, Hollingsworth HH, Stark SL, Morgan KA. Participation survey/mobility: psychometric properties of a measure of participation for people with mobility impairments and limitations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Feb;87(2):189-97. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.09.014.
- Curtis KA, Roach KE, Applegate EB, Amar T, Benbow CS, Genecco TD, Gualano J. Development of the Wheelchair User's Shoulder Pain Index (WUSPI). Paraplegia. 1995 May;33(5):290-3. doi: 10.1038/sc.1995.65.
- Toglia J, Fitzgerald KA, O'Dell MW, Mastrogiovanni AR, Lin CD. The Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment in persons with mild subacute stroke: relationship to functional outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 May;92(5):792-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.12.034.
- Rushton PW, Kirby RL, Miller WC. Manual wheelchair skills: objective testing versus subjective questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Dec;93(12):2313-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.06.007. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
- Lindquist NJ, Loudon PE, Magis TF, Rispin JE, Kirby RL, Manns PJ. Reliability of the performance and safety scores of the wheelchair skills test version 4.1 for manual wheelchair users. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Nov;91(11):1752-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.226.
- Mountain AD, Kirby RL, Smith C. The wheelchair skills test, version 2.4: Validity of an algorithm-based questionnaire version. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Mar;85(3):416-23. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00427-1.
- Heinemann AW, Lai JS, Magasi S, Hammel J, Corrigan JD, Bogner JA, Whiteneck GG. Measuring participation enfranchisement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Apr;92(4):564-71. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.220. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
- Stinson JN, Kavanagh T, Yamada J, Gill N, Stevens B. Systematic review of the psychometric properties, interpretability and feasibility of self-report pain intensity measures for use in clinical trials in children and adolescents. Pain. 2006 Nov;125(1-2):143-57. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.05.006. Epub 2006 Jun 13.
- Gagnon DH, Roy A, Verrier MC, Duclos C, Craven BC, Nadeau S. Do Performance-Based Wheelchair Propulsion Tests Detect Changes Among Manual Wheelchair Users With Spinal Cord Injury During Inpatient Rehabilitation in Quebec? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jul;97(7):1214-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.02.018. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
- Pradon D, Pinsault N, Zory R, Routhier F. Could mobilty performance measures be used to evaluate wheelchair skills? J Rehabil Med. 2012 Mar;44(3):276-9. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0919.
- Sawatzky B, Hers N, MacGillivray MK. Relationships between wheeling parameters and wheelchair skills in adults and children with SCI. Spinal Cord. 2015 Jul;53(7):561-4. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.29. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
- Motion Analysis Corporation. HiRes Motion Analysis Corporation System. Santa Rosa, CA.
- Cowan RE, Nash MS, Collinger JL, Koontz AM, Boninger ML. Impact of surface type, wheelchair weight, and axle position on wheelchair propulsion by novice older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Jul;90(7):1076-83. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.10.034.
- Three Rivers Holdings, LLC. SmartWheel. Mesa, AZ.
- Asato KT, Cooper RA, Robertson RN, Ster JF. SMARTWheels: development and testing of a system for measuring manual wheelchair propulsion dynamics. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1993 Dec;40(12):1320-4. doi: 10.1109/10.250587.
- Cooper RA. SMARTWheel: From concept to clinical practice. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2009 Sep;33(3):198-209. doi: 10.1080/03093640903082126.
- Lui J, MacGillivray MK, Sawatzky BJ. Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change of the SmartWheel clinical protocol. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Dec;93(12):2367-72. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.07.008. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
- ActiGraph, LLC. GT9X Activity Monitors. Pensacola, FL.
- Garcia-Masso X, Serra-Ano P, Garcia-Raffi LM, Sanchez-Perez EA, Lopez-Pascual J, Gonzalez LM. Validation of the use of Actigraph GT3X accelerometers to estimate energy expenditure in full time manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2013 Dec;51(12):898-903. doi: 10.1038/sc.2013.85. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
- Nyland J, Quigley P, Huang C, Lloyd J, Harrow J, Nelson A. Preserving transfer independence among individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2000 Nov;38(11):649-57. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101070.
- Wulf G, McNevin N, Shea CH. The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2001 Nov;54(4):1143-54. doi: 10.1080/713756012.
- Wulf G, Shea C, Lewthwaite R. Motor skill learning and performance: a review of influential factors. Med Educ. 2010 Jan;44(1):75-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03421.x.
- Shea, J. B. & Morgan, R. L. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 179-187.
- Del Rey P, Wughalter EH, Whitehurst M. The effects of contextual interference on females with varied experience in open sport skills. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1982 Jun;53(2):108-15. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1982.10605236. No abstract available.
- Hall KG, Domingues DA, Cavazos R. Contextual interference effects with skilled baseball players. Percept Mot Skills. 1994 Jun;78(3 Pt 1):835-41. doi: 10.1177/003151259407800331.
- Schmidt RA, Young DE, Swinnen S, Shapiro DC. Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: support for the guidance hypothesis. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1989 Mar;15(2):352-9. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.15.2.352.
- Gevins A, Smith ME, Leong H, McEvoy L, Whitfield S, Du R, Rush G. Monitoring working memory load during computer-based tasks with EEG pattern recognition methods. Hum Factors. 1998 Mar;40(1):79-91. doi: 10.1518/001872098779480578.
- Schmidt RA, Wulf G. Continuous concurrent feedback degrades skill learning: implications for training and simulation. Hum Factors. 1997 Dec;39(4):509-25. doi: 10.1518/001872097778667979.
- Goodwin JE, Eckerson JM, Voll CA Jr. Testing specificity and guidance hypotheses by manipulating relative frequency of KR scheduling in motor skill acquisition. Percept Mot Skills. 2001 Dec;93(3):819-24. doi: 10.2466/pms.2001.93.3.819.
- MATLAB version 7.10.0. (2010). Natick, Massachusetts: The MathWorks Inc.
- SPSS Inc. (2012). SPSS Statistics Version 21. Chicago, IL: IBM.
- Chisholm D, Toto P, Raina K, Holm M, Rogers J. Evaluating capacity to live independently and safely in the community: Performance Assessment of Self-care Skills. Br J Occup Ther. 2014 Feb;77(2):59-63. doi: 10.4276/030802214X13916969447038.
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.