神经调节辅助的自我脱离:NEURO-EGO 研究第一阶段
神经调节辅助的自我脱离:神经自我研究
这项临床试验的目的是了解大脑刺激技术是否可以帮助人们快速轻松地达到冥想状态,而无需进行多年的冥想训练。 研究人员想看看这是否能帮助人们远离自己的想法和感受,以及是否能像冥想一样改善开放性和幸福感。
参与者将:
- 完成调查问卷
- 执行引导冥想任务(贝尔任务)
- 佩戴高密度耳蜗电图 (hdEEG) 帽
- 接受大脑刺激
研究概览
详细说明
这项研究的目的是评估不同类型的非侵入性脑刺激 - NIBS(TES-TI 和 TES)对经验丰富的冥想者和初次冥想的健康成年人的主观自我脱离和皮质活动的相对有效性。
第 1a 阶段旨在建立最佳刺激水平,以实现经验丰富的冥想者的自我位移。 阶段 1b 将使用阶段 1a 中建立的刺激水平来辨别后内侧皮层 (PMC) 区域,在该区域中,干扰对于经验丰富的冥想者实现自我位移最为有效。 第二阶段将使用最有效的刺激和 PMC 参数来冥想天真的健康成年人。
研究类型
注册 (估计的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习联系方式
- 姓名:Simone Bruno
- 电话号码:608-209-4108
- 邮箱:sbruno3@wisc.edu
学习地点
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Madison、Wisconsin、美国、53719
- 招聘中
- University of Wisconsin
-
首席研究员:
- Melanie Boly, MD, PhD
-
接触:
- Simone Bruno
- 电话号码:608-209-4108
- 邮箱:sbruno3@wisc.edu
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 成人
- 年长者
接受健康志愿者
描述
纳入标准:
- 成人,年龄 18 至 55 岁,任何性别
- 医学上健康
- 会说英语(能够提供同意书并完成调查问卷)
- 坚持冥想练习的健康成年人
排除标准:
- 任何当前或既往的神经系统疾病或获得性神经系统疾病病史(例如,神经系统疾病) 中风、创伤性脑损伤),包括颅内病变
- 目前或既往有双相情感障碍和/或轻躁狂病史
- 目前或既往有任何精神病史
- 头部外伤史导致长时间失去知觉;或有 >3 级 I 级脑震荡病史
- 目前头痛控制不良的病史,包括顽固性或控制不良的偏头痛
- 任何全身性疾病或不稳定的医疗状况,在诱发癫痫发作时可能会导致医疗紧急情况(心脏畸形、心律失常、哮喘等)
- 不明或未确定病因的昏厥史,可能构成癫痫发作
- 癫痫病史、癫痫诊断、异常(癫痫样)脑电图病史或治疗难治性癫痫家族史,良性病因的单次癫痫发作除外(例如癫痫发作)。 热性惊厥)根据委员会认证的神经科医生的判断
- 可能怀孕。 所有育龄女性参与者都必须进行妊娠测试
- 大脑、头骨或其他地方的任何金属
- 任何医疗设备或植入物(即 心脏起搏器、药物输液泵、人工耳蜗、迷走神经刺激器、牙科植入物),除非得到负责的医学博士批准
- 过去六个月内药物滥用或依赖
- 任何可能改变癫痫阈值的药物,即 ADHD 兴奋剂(阿得拉、安非他明);三环/非典型抗抑郁药(阿米替林、二氧塞平、丙咪嗪、马普替林、去甲替林、安非他酮);抗精神病药(氯丙嗪、氯氮平)、支气管扩张剂(茶碱、氨茶碱);抗生素(氟喹诺酮类、亚胺培南、青霉素、头孢菌素、甲硝唑、异烟肼);抗病毒药(伐昔洛韦、利托那韦);非处方药(苯海拉明)
- 幽闭恐惧症(对狭小或封闭的地方的恐惧)
- 背部问题导致无法平躺两个小时
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:基础科学
- 分配:不适用
- 介入模型:单组作业
- 屏蔽:无(打开标签)
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的:刺激
参与者将在完成认知评估的同时接受假刺激、TES 或 TES-TI 刺激。
|
TES 使用特定的电极排列模式来选择性地刺激大脑。
参与者将佩戴 hdEEG(高密度脑电图)帽,允许 TES 间歇性刺激。
TES-TI 使用特定的电极排列模式来选择性地刺激大脑。
参与者将佩戴 hdEEG(高密度脑电图)帽,这将允许 TES-TI 进行间歇性刺激。
TES-TI假手术包括以相同频率接收所有电极的刺激。
假手术将包括施用经颅随机噪声刺激(TRN),随机振荡电流。
它还将包括没有刺激的时期和加速周期,然后没有刺激。
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
自我脱离量表
大体时间:一次研究访视时收集的数据(任何时间最多 2 周的研究)
|
自我脱离将使用响铃任务来测量。
这个冥想任务由五个“钟声试验”组成。
在每次试验中,受试者将被要求集中注意力在铃声上,直到铃声消失,然后在声音消失后留下的空白处,尽可能长时间地休息(冥想条件)。
之后,受试者将回答一些旨在评估试验期间自我脱离程度的问题。
这是一个包含五个问题的表格,要求受试者按照 0-4 的等级对他们在之前的钟声试验中感知某事、想象某事、思考自己或思考某事的程度进行评分,然后进行评分试验期间他们情绪状态的效价从 1(高度消极)到 6(高度积极)。
|
一次研究访视时收集的数据(任何时间最多 2 周的研究)
|
|
皮质活动 - 伽马带功率的变化
大体时间:一次研究访视时收集的数据(任何时间最多 2 周的研究)
|
伽玛波段功率将在刺激期间用 hdEEG 进行测量。
减少表明自我脱离程度更高。
|
一次研究访视时收集的数据(任何时间最多 2 周的研究)
|
|
皮质活动 - α 波段功率的变化
大体时间:一次研究访视时收集的数据(任何时间最多 2 周的研究)
|
刺激期间将使用 hdEEG 测量 Alpha 波段功率。
增加表明自我脱离程度更高。
|
一次研究访视时收集的数据(任何时间最多 2 周的研究)
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
隐式关联任务:响应时间
大体时间:一次研究访视时收集的数据(任何时间最多 2 周的研究)
|
IAT 是一种心理工具,旨在测量对象或概念的心理表征之间自动关联的强度。
IAT 通常涉及尽快将计算机屏幕上出现的单词或图像分类为不同的组。
例如,参与者可能会被要求将单词分类为“愉快”或“不愉快”,将图像分类为“年轻”或“年老”。
参与者对项目进行分类的速度至关重要。
更快的响应时间表明正在测试的类别之间的隐式关联更强。
|
一次研究访视时收集的数据(任何时间最多 2 周的研究)
|
|
隐式关联任务:以错误分类数量报告的准确性
大体时间:一次研究访视时收集的数据(任何时间最多 2 周的研究)
|
IAT 是一种心理工具,旨在测量对象或概念的心理表征之间自动关联的强度。
IAT 通常涉及尽快将计算机屏幕上出现的单词或图像分类为不同的组。
例如,参与者可能会被要求将单词分类为“愉快”或“不愉快”,将图像分类为“年轻”或“年老”。
参与者完成 8 个区块,每组 24 项试验,包括两组,每组 4 个不一致区块和 4 个一致区块。
在每组块中,第一次试验作为练习试验。
|
一次研究访视时收集的数据(任何时间最多 2 周的研究)
|
|
隐式关联任务:D 分数
大体时间:一次研究访视时收集的数据(任何时间最多 2 周的研究)
|
IAT 是一种心理工具,旨在测量对象或概念的心理表征之间自动关联的强度。 IAT 通常涉及尽快将计算机屏幕上出现的单词或图像分类为不同的组。 例如,参与者可能会被要求将单词分类为“愉快”或“不愉快”,将图像分类为“年轻”或“年老”。 这里报告的是 D 分数,用于衡量一致和不一致配对的平均响应时间之间的标准化差异,并根据错误数量进行调整。 它的范围通常是 -2 到 2。接近零的分数表示无私地处理恐惧。 正分数预计代表对恐惧的认同。 相反,负分预计代表对恐惧的负面自我参照评价。 |
一次研究访视时收集的数据(任何时间最多 2 周的研究)
|
|
快速判别任务:速度
大体时间:一次研究访视时收集的数据(任何时间最多 2 周的研究)
|
快速辨别任务是一项认知任务,用于评估个体快速准确地区分不同刺激的能力。 参与者会受到一系列刺激,这些刺激的属性可能有所不同,例如形状、颜色、大小或情绪表达。 该任务要求参与者通常在时间限制下对刺激做出快速决定。 测量反应的速度和准确性来评估感知和认知能力。 对于快速辨别任务,使用 Eprime 呈现两个相邻的黑白几何形状。 在某些幻灯片中,这两个形状是相同的,而在其他幻灯片中,它们的不同之处在于形状的一条线或外边缘与另一条略有不同。 如果它们相同,则指示参与者按键盘上的“S”按钮,如果不同,则按键盘上的“L”按钮。 此操作将重复最多 25 分钟,直到任务结束。 |
一次研究访视时收集的数据(任何时间最多 2 周的研究)
|
|
快速判别任务:准确性
大体时间:一次研究访视时收集的数据(任何时间最多 2 周的研究)
|
快速辨别任务是一项认知任务,用于评估个体快速准确地区分不同刺激的能力。 参与者会受到一系列刺激,这些刺激的属性可能有所不同,例如形状、颜色、大小或情绪表达。 该任务要求参与者通常在时间限制下对刺激做出快速决定。 测量反应的速度和准确性来评估感知和认知能力。 对于快速辨别任务,使用 Eprime 呈现两个相邻的黑白几何形状。 在某些幻灯片中,这两个形状是相同的,而在其他幻灯片中,它们的不同之处在于形状的一条线或外边缘与另一条略有不同。 如果它们相同,则指示参与者按键盘上的“S”按钮,如果不同,则按键盘上的“L”按钮。 此操作将重复最多 25 分钟,直到任务结束。 |
一次研究访视时收集的数据(任何时间最多 2 周的研究)
|
|
自发心理任务
大体时间:一次研究访视时收集的数据(任何时间最多 2 周的研究)
|
睁眼或闭眼的参与者都会在蜂鸣声的提示下报告在声音响起之前他们脑海中最后想到的事情(图像、想法、感觉、情绪……)。 在这份开放式报告之后,参与者还将被要求根据 VAS 量表(例如,从 0 到 5)对他们的意识、心理内容的一些质量方面进行评分(例如,它是如何像思想或图像一样;或认知努力的程度)。 【VAS评分会报告吗?】 |
一次研究访视时收集的数据(任何时间最多 2 周的研究)
|
|
自动情绪调节任务
大体时间:一小时 MRI 访视时收集的数据(安排在研究两周内)
|
自动情绪调节(AER)任务旨在研究个体如何在无意识的情况下调节自己的情绪反应。 在此任务中,参与者在此实验图像中受到各种情绪刺激,这些刺激通常被分类为积极的(例如小狗或日落)、消极的(例如自然灾害或遇险者的图像) ,或中性(例如,椅子或建筑物的照片)。 这些刺激会迅速呈现,以最大限度地减少有意识的调节努力。 在任务期间,将记录功能性 MRI 数据。 目标是衡量参与者如何有效地自动调节他们的情绪反应。 数据分析侧重于比较不同情绪条件下的反应,以推断自动情绪调节的效率。 参与者将根据 VAS 量表(从 1 到 10)对每张图片引发的情感内容的强度进行评分,数字越高表示越强烈。 |
一小时 MRI 访视时收集的数据(安排在研究两周内)
|
|
静息状态任务
大体时间:一小时 MRI 访视时收集的数据(安排在研究两周内)
|
参与者只需安静地休息,保持清醒但放松,记录大脑活动,不受任何外部刺激的影响。 每个体素内测量的信号基于血氧水平依赖性 (BOLD) 对比度,反映了与神经活动相关的血流和氧合作用的变化。 虽然静息状态活动可以帮助解释不同的任务状态,但它本身将主要作为一种衡量标准来评估参与者的基线大脑功能组织。 |
一小时 MRI 访视时收集的数据(安排在研究两周内)
|
|
Big Five Aspects Scale (BFAS)
大体时间:Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
This is a 44-item inventory that measures five different personality traits by asking subjects to respond to various items (e.g., I see myself as someone who is talkative) on a scale from 1 (disagree strongly) to 5 (agree strongly).
|
Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
|
Fulfilled Life Scale (FLS)
大体时间:Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
This is a 32-item inventory that asks subjects to respond to various items (e.g., When I look back on my life, I feel deep inner contentment) on a scale from 1 (does not apply at all) to 6 (applies completely) and is designed to assess subjects' feelings of having lived a full life.
|
Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety
大体时间:Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
This is an 8-item inventory asking subjects to rate from 1-5 the frequency with which they have experienced components of anxiety in the last seven days.
Higher scores reflect greater anxiety.
|
Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
|
PROMIS Depression
大体时间:Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
This is an 8-item inventory asking subjects to rate from 1-5 the frequency with which they have experienced components of depression in the last seven days.
Higher scores reflect greater depression.
|
Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
|
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
大体时间:Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
This is a 10-item inventory asking subjects to rate from 0-4 the frequency with which they have felt various kinds of stress in the last month.
Participants rate each item on a scale ranging from "Never (0)" to "Very often (4)".
Seven of the items with positive statements are scored in reverse.
As the scores obtained from the scale increase, the perceived stress level of the person increases.
Scores range from 0-40.
|
Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
|
Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being (QEWB)
大体时间:Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
This is a 21-item inventory asking subjects to rate from 0-4 the extent to which they agree with various statements designed to assess their overall well-being.
Scores range from 0-84 with higher scores indicating higher levels of well-being.
|
Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
|
Psychological Wellbeing Scale (PWB)
大体时间:Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
The PWB Scale is a tool designed to measure various aspects of an individual's psychological well-being.
The scale consists of 18 items and assesses six key dimensions of well-being: Autonomy - The ability to make independent decisions and resist social pressures; Environmental Mastery -The capacity to manage one's life and surrounding environment effectively; Personal Growth - A sense of continued development and realization of one's potential; Positive Relations with Others -The presence of meaningful, trusting relationships; Purpose in Life - Having goals and a sense of direction in life; Self-Acceptance - A positive attitude towards oneself and one's past life.
There are three items per each dimension.
Each item is rated on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree), higher scores indicate higher wellbeing.
|
Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
|
IQSS Flourishing Measure
大体时间:Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
The Human Flourishing Measures is designed to assess various domains of human well-being and flourishing.
Developed by the Human Flourishing Program at Harvard University, this measure aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of an individual's overall well-being, across different domains such as, health, life satisfaction, purpose, close relationships.
The questionnaire consists of 12 items, rated from 0 (Strongly disagree) to 10 (Strongly agree).
High scores imply that people perceive themselves very positively in terms of human flourishing.
|
Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
|
Metacognitive Processes of Decentering Scale (MPoD)
大体时间:Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
The MPoD is designed to measure the ability to decenter from internal experiences.
Decentering involves viewing thoughts and feelings as temporary and objective events in the mind, rather than as reflections of the self.
Items are scored from 1 (never or very rarely) to 5 (very often or always) for a total range of scores from 15-75 where higher scores indicate higher levels of engagement with trait-like metacognitive processes of decentering.
|
Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
|
Experiences Questionnaire (EQ)
大体时间:Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
This 20-item self-report measure assesses trait levels of decentering and rumination.
Decentering refers to the ability to view one's thoughts and feelings as temporary, objective events rather than reflections of the self.
It is a key component of mindfulness and is often developed through meditation practices.
The component Rumination includes items that measure the tendency to dwell on negative thoughts and feelings.
For example, items might ask about the frequency of repetitive, negative thinking.
Items are scored from 1 (never) to 5 (all the time) where higher scores indicate indicate higher decentering and rumination.
|
Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
|
Self-Reflection Insight Scale (SRIS)
大体时间:Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
The SRIS is a psychometric tool designed to measure two critical components of self-awareness: self-reflection and insight.
It provides a reliable means of assessing individuals' tendencies to engage in introspection and their ability to gain clear understanding from such introspection.
Participants respond to each item using a Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree).
Higher scores indicate self-awareness.
|
Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
|
Non-Attachment Scale (NAS)
大体时间:Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
NAS is designed to assess the extent to which individuals experience nonattachment in their daily lives.
The NAS consists of 30 items that participants rate based on their agreement from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree).
The items are designed to capture various aspects of nonattachment, such as the ability to let go of thoughts and emotions, and the tendency to experience life without excessive clinging or aversion.
Higher scores indicate more non-attachment.
|
Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
|
Non-Attachment to Self Scale (NTS)
大体时间:Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
NTS is a psychological measure designed to assess the degree to which individuals are not fixated on self-related concepts, thoughts, and feelings.
It captures the ability to interact with these self-related elements flexibly and without trying to control them.
It is a single factor, 7-item scale, where each item is scored from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 7 (Strongly Agree).
Higher scores indicate more non-attachment to self.
|
Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
|
Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ)
大体时间:Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
FFMQ is a comprehensive self-report instrument designed to assess mindfulness across five distinct dimensions.
The FFMQ consists of 39 items, divided into five subscales, each representing a different facet of mindfulness: observing, describing, acting with awareness, nonjudging of inner experience, nonreactivity to inner experience.
Participants respond to each item using a Likert scale ranging from 1 (never or very rarely true) to 5 (very often or always true).
Higher scores on the FFMQ reflects a higher level of mindfulness (a better outcome).
|
Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
|
Drexel Defusion Scale (DDS)
大体时间:Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
DDS is a psychometric instrument developed to measure the construct of defusion, which refers to the ability to achieve psychological distance from internal experiences such as thoughts and feelings.
Participants respond to each item using a six-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much), for a total possible range of scores from 0-50, higher scores indicate increased ability to defuse.
|
Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
|
Relationship Questionnaire (RQ)
大体时间:Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
RQ is a self-report instrument designed to assess various dimensions of interpersonal relationship styles.
The RQ consists of 4 items, each describing a specific relationship style.
Participants rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from "1 = Strongly Disagree" to "7 = Strongly Agree."
|
Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
|
UCLA Loneliness Scale (ULS)
大体时间:Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
ULS is a widely used tool designed to measure an individual's subjective feelings of loneliness and social isolation.
The scale consists of 20 items.
Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Never) to 4 (Often).
Some items are reverse-scored to control for response bias.
The total score ranges from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater levels of loneliness.
|
Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
|
Social Connectedness Scale (SCS)
大体时间:Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
SCS, developed by Richard M. Lee and Steven B. Robbins in 1995, is a self-report questionnaire designed to measure the extent to which individuals feel connected to others in their social environment.
The scale assesses feelings of closeness and belongingness, which are crucial for psychological well-being.
The scale consists of 20 items.
Each item is rated on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree).
Higher scores indicate a greater sense of social connectedness, while lower scores suggest feelings of social isolation or disconnection.
|
Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
|
Attachment Style Questionnaire (ASQ)
大体时间:Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
ASQ is a self-report measure designed to assess adult attachment styles.
This questionnaire helps identify how individuals typically think, feel, and behave in close relationships.
The ASQ consists of 40 items rated on 6-point Likert Scale (1 Totally disagree - 6 Totally Agree).
It measures five dimensions of attachment, that is, confidence, discomfort with closeness, need for approval, preoccupation with relationship, relationship as secondary.
|
Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
|
Emotional Intelligence Scale (EIS)
大体时间:Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
EIS is designed to measure the ability to identify, assess, and manage the emotions of oneself, others, and groups.
The EIS consists of 33 items.
Participants rate each item on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
Higher scores indicate higher emotional intelligence.
|
Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
|
Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11)
大体时间:Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
BIS-11 is a widely used self-report measure designed to assess the personality/behavioral construct of impulsiveness. The BIS-11 consists of 30 items, each rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (rarely/never) to 4 (almost always/always). The BIS-11 measures three primary dimensions of impulsiveness:
Each of these dimensions is further broken down into subscales, providing a detailed profile of an individual's impulsivity traits. The total score ranges from 30 to 120, with higher scores indicating higher levels of impulsiveness. |
Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
|
Dickman Impulsivity Inventory (DII)
大体时间:Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
DII is a self-report measure designed to assess two distinct types of impulsivity: functional impulsivity and dysfunctional impulsivity. Functional Impulsivity is characterized by the tendency to act quickly and effectively in situations where such behavior is beneficial. Dysfunctional Impulsivity involves acting with less forethought than most people, leading to negative outcomes. The DII consists of 23 items that are true or false statements. Each true statement is scored as 1. The scores for each subscale (functional impulsivity and dysfunctional impulsivity) are summed, with higher scores indicating higher levels of functional or dysfunctional impulsivity. |
Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
|
Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (VVIQ)
大体时间:Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
VVIQ is a tool developed to assess the vividness of an individual's visual imagination.
Items are scored on a 5-point Likert Scale from 1 (no image at all) to 5 (Perfectly clear and as vivid as normal vision).
The questionnaire includes scenarios such as visualizing a friend's face, a rising sun, and other common scenes to gauge the vividness of the mental images.
Higher scores indicate more vivid visual imagery.
|
Data collected at one study visit (anytime up to 2 weeks on study)
|
合作者和调查者
调查人员
- 首席研究员:Melanie Boly, MD, PhD、University of Wisconsin, Madison
出版物和有用的链接
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (估计的)
研究完成 (估计的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.