此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

导管与窥视笼

2026年9月23日 更新者:University of Pennsylvania

直接侧向室内融合(DLIF)的患者的导管与窥视笼:一项随机,前瞻性试验

In this study, the Principal Investigator aim to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients with degenerative lumbar disease undergoing direct lateral interbody fusion (DLIF) using two different types of lateral interbody cages: PEEK cages combined with rhBMP-2 versus CONDUIT cages. This will be a randomized, prospective, open-label clinical trial. By examining these two groups, the PI hope to determine whether PEEK cages with rhBMP-2 and CONDUIT cages are equally effective for DLIF procedures. The findings from this study will help us optimize the surgical approach for future patients undergoing DLIF.

研究概览

详细说明

Direct lateral interbody fusion (DLIF) is a powerful surgical tool in a spine surgeon's armamentarium to address lumbar spine pathology minimally invasively. It has been widely adopted amongst spine surgeons to gain access to the lumbar disc through a small incision on a patient's flank. Through a retroperitoneal approach, the surgeon can perform discectomy, prep end plates, and insert an interbody cage with a much longer (lateral-medial) and wider (anterior-posterior) footprint than posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Using either transpsoas or anterior-to-psoas (ATP) technique, the surgeons are now able to address lumbar spine pathologies affecting L2 to S1 minimally invasively. Both approaches are acceptable and widely adopted amongst spine surgeons. There are many commercially available FDA-approved DLIF cages in market for spine surgeons to use. The cages made of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and titanium are most commonly used. Many surgeons who use PEEK cages in DLIF supplement the construct with recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) to achieve fusion. PEEK has an inert and hydrophobic property which does not induce osteogenesis. In-vitro studies demonstrate absence of bone formation through PEEK. By adding rhBMP-2, it may induce robust osteoinduction around PEEK, achieving fusion across disk space over time. On the other hand, porous titanium has all three properties: osteoconductivity, osteoinductivity, and osseointegration. This may create a more favorable environment for fusion, which obviates the need for rhBMP-2 supplementation. Both types of cages are approved for the study's indications and are routinely used in DLIF at Penn. The surgical staff is qualified to implant both devices.

Aside from the type of cage used, subjects' DLIF procedures will not be altered for the purposes of the study. There are no known differences in the risks and benefits of the two cages being studied. Cage choice in routine care is based on each individual surgeon's standard-of-care preference. As such, there is a possibility of the patient getting either of these cages placed, should they choose to not participate in the study.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

32

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia、Pennsylvania、美国、19107
        • Pennsylvania Hospital

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 孩子
  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

不

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • Patients with one to two consecutive level lumbar degenerative disease from L2to S1, including Grade 1 (<25%) Spondylolisthesis

    • Patients undergoing direct lateral interbody fusion (transpsoas or anterior-to-psoas approach) for lumbar disease
    • Skeletally mature patients, aged 18 and older
    • Patients able to fully comply with the clinical protocol and adhere to the follow-up schedule and protocol requirements
    • Patients able to understand and sign the study-specific, IRB approved informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Spondylolisthesis greater than Grade 1

    • Traumatic lumbar disease

    • Spinal Deformity

      • Coronal Cobb angle greater than 40 degrees
      • Severe sagittal imbalance
    • Existing fusion construct longer than 2 consecutive levels

    • Active infection - systemic or local

    • Tumor diagnosis

    • Untreated osteoporosis, defined as T Spine < -2.5 on DEXA scan

    • Active smoking habit

    • Current incarceration

    • Pregnancy

    • Involvement in an active spinal litigation

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:单身的

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
其他:Conduit

Patients undergoing DLIf (transposons or anterior-to-psoas approach) will be randomized to PEEK cages + rhBMP-2 vs. CONDUIT cages to compare the clinical outcomes and determine the associated cost.

Comparison between cages to determine the effectiveness and cost related to the study procedures.

其他:PEEK + rh-BMP-2 cage

Patients undergoing DLIf (transposons or anterior-to-psoas approach) will be randomized to PEEK cages + rhBMP-2 vs. CONDUIT cages to compare the clinical outcomes and determine the associated cost.

Comparison between cages to determine the effectiveness and cost related to the study procedures.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Clinical outcomes
大体时间:24 months

Difference in fusion rates for patients who get the PEEK + rh-BMP-2 cage and those who get the CONDUIT cage.

24 months
ODI scores
大体时间:24 months

The ODI is comprised of ten items with associated statements for the patient to select which reflect the patient's ability to manage their everyday life while dealing with their pain. Each of the ten items in the ODI has six statements from which patients are requested to select one. This allows scoring from 0-5 for each item. A maximum score of 50 is possible. The score obtained by individual patients can be multiplied by 2, and this will provide a percentage score

24 months

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Cost
大体时间:24 months

Costs associated with the PEEK + rh-BMP-2 and CONDUIT cages will be assessed.

24 months

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2021年3月13日

初级完成 (实际的)

2026年7月31日

研究完成 (实际的)

2026年7月31日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2025年3月7日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2025年3月24日

首次发布 (实际的)

2025年4月1日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年9月24日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年9月23日

最后验证

2026年9月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • 844964

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

未定

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

是的

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅