Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Ledning vs. peek bure

23. september 2026 opdateret af: University of Pennsylvania

Conduit vs. peek bure hos patienter, der gennemgår direkte lateral interbody fusion (DLIF): et randomiseret, potentielt forsøg

In this study, the Principal Investigator aim to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients with degenerative lumbar disease undergoing direct lateral interbody fusion (DLIF) using two different types of lateral interbody cages: PEEK cages combined with rhBMP-2 versus CONDUIT cages. This will be a randomized, prospective, open-label clinical trial. By examining these two groups, the PI hope to determine whether PEEK cages with rhBMP-2 and CONDUIT cages are equally effective for DLIF procedures. The findings from this study will help us optimize the surgical approach for future patients undergoing DLIF.

Studieoversigt

Status

Afsluttet

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Direct lateral interbody fusion (DLIF) is a powerful surgical tool in a spine surgeon's armamentarium to address lumbar spine pathology minimally invasively. It has been widely adopted amongst spine surgeons to gain access to the lumbar disc through a small incision on a patient's flank. Through a retroperitoneal approach, the surgeon can perform discectomy, prep end plates, and insert an interbody cage with a much longer (lateral-medial) and wider (anterior-posterior) footprint than posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Using either transpsoas or anterior-to-psoas (ATP) technique, the surgeons are now able to address lumbar spine pathologies affecting L2 to S1 minimally invasively. Both approaches are acceptable and widely adopted amongst spine surgeons. There are many commercially available FDA-approved DLIF cages in market for spine surgeons to use. The cages made of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and titanium are most commonly used. Many surgeons who use PEEK cages in DLIF supplement the construct with recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) to achieve fusion. PEEK has an inert and hydrophobic property which does not induce osteogenesis. In-vitro studies demonstrate absence of bone formation through PEEK. By adding rhBMP-2, it may induce robust osteoinduction around PEEK, achieving fusion across disk space over time. On the other hand, porous titanium has all three properties: osteoconductivity, osteoinductivity, and osseointegration. This may create a more favorable environment for fusion, which obviates the need for rhBMP-2 supplementation. Both types of cages are approved for the study's indications and are routinely used in DLIF at Penn. The surgical staff is qualified to implant both devices.

Aside from the type of cage used, subjects' DLIF procedures will not be altered for the purposes of the study. There are no known differences in the risks and benefits of the two cages being studied. Cage choice in routine care is based on each individual surgeon's standard-of-care preference. As such, there is a possibility of the patient getting either of these cages placed, should they choose to not participate in the study.

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

32

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Forenede Stater, 19107
        • Pennsylvania Hospital

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Barn
  • Voksen
  • Ældre voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • Patients with one to two consecutive level lumbar degenerative disease from L2to S1, including Grade 1 (<25%) Spondylolisthesis

    • Patients undergoing direct lateral interbody fusion (transpsoas or anterior-to-psoas approach) for lumbar disease
    • Skeletally mature patients, aged 18 and older
    • Patients able to fully comply with the clinical protocol and adhere to the follow-up schedule and protocol requirements
    • Patients able to understand and sign the study-specific, IRB approved informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Spondylolisthesis greater than Grade 1

    • Traumatic lumbar disease

    • Spinal Deformity

      • Coronal Cobb angle greater than 40 degrees
      • Severe sagittal imbalance
    • Existing fusion construct longer than 2 consecutive levels

    • Active infection - systemic or local

    • Tumor diagnosis

    • Untreated osteoporosis, defined as T Spine < -2.5 on DEXA scan

    • Active smoking habit

    • Current incarceration

    • Pregnancy

    • Involvement in an active spinal litigation

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Enkelt

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Andet: Conduit

Patients undergoing DLIf (transposons or anterior-to-psoas approach) will be randomized to PEEK cages + rhBMP-2 vs. CONDUIT cages to compare the clinical outcomes and determine the associated cost.

Comparison between cages to determine the effectiveness and cost related to the study procedures.

Andet: PEEK + rh-BMP-2 cage

Patients undergoing DLIf (transposons or anterior-to-psoas approach) will be randomized to PEEK cages + rhBMP-2 vs. CONDUIT cages to compare the clinical outcomes and determine the associated cost.

Comparison between cages to determine the effectiveness and cost related to the study procedures.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Clinical outcomes
Tidsramme: 24 months

Difference in fusion rates for patients who get the PEEK + rh-BMP-2 cage and those who get the CONDUIT cage.

24 months
ODI scores
Tidsramme: 24 months

The ODI is comprised of ten items with associated statements for the patient to select which reflect the patient's ability to manage their everyday life while dealing with their pain. Each of the ten items in the ODI has six statements from which patients are requested to select one. This allows scoring from 0-5 for each item. A maximum score of 50 is possible. The score obtained by individual patients can be multiplied by 2, and this will provide a percentage score

24 months

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Cost
Tidsramme: 24 months

Costs associated with the PEEK + rh-BMP-2 and CONDUIT cages will be assessed.

24 months

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

13. marts 2021

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

31. juli 2026

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

31. juli 2026

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

7. marts 2025

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

24. marts 2025

Først opslået (Faktiske)

1. april 2025

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

24. september 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

23. september 2026

Sidst verificeret

1. september 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • 844964

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

UBESLUTET

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ja

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Abonner