腹腔冲洗能否进一步减轻低压vNOTES子宫切除术后的疼痛? (Low-Pressure)
腹腔冲洗能否进一步降低低压vNOTES子宫切除术后的疼痛?一项随机对照试验的结果。
The evolution of minimally invasive gynecology has transitioned from traditional laparotomy to laparoscopy, and most recently, to vNOTES (Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery). By combining the visual advantages of endoscopy with the scarless approach of vaginal surgery, vNOTES has demonstrated superior outcomes in terms of reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, and improved cosmetic results compared to traditional total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH).
Despite these advancements, post-laparoscopic pain syndrome (PLPS) remains a significant clinical challenge. Characterized by deep-seated abdominal pressure and referred shoulder-tip pain, PLPS is primarily attributed to the irritation of the phrenic nerve caused by residual carbon dioxide and the formation of carbonic acid on the peritoneal surface. In the Trendelenburg position required for gynecologic procedures, this gas often becomes trapped in the subdiaphragmatic space, leading to significant distress that can delay discharge even when the surgical site itself is healing well.
The physiological impact of the pneumoperitoneum is largely pressure-dependent. The landmark study by Barczyński and Herman (2004) in general surgery established that maintaining a low-pressure pneumoperitoneum (<10 mmHg) significantly reduces peritoneal stretching and the subsequent inflammatory response. Furthermore, the technique of intraperitoneal saline washout has been proposed to physically remove residual CO2 and dilute acidic metabolites, thereby mitigating phrenic nerve irritation.
While these techniques have been validated in abdominal laparoscopic procedures such as cholecystectomy, their efficacy within the unique framework of vNOTES hysterectomy remains unexplored. vNOTES naturally utilizes lower pressures than traditional laparoscopy, yet the incidence of referred pain persists. There is currently a lack of high-level evidence determining whether the addition of a standardized saline washout provides an incremental benefit over low-pressure vNOTES alone.
The aim of this prospective, randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the impact of intraperitoneal saline washout on postoperative pain scores and analgesic consumption in patients undergoing low-pressure vNOTES hysterectomy. The investigators hypothesize that the combination of low-pressure insufflation and active saline washout will result in a synergistic reduction in post-laparoscopic pain, facilitating an ultra-fast-track recovery protocol.
研究概览
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
-
Muğla、土耳其(türkiye)、35460
- Mugla Education and Research Hospital
-
Muğla、土耳其(türkiye)
- Muğla Sıtkı Kocman University
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Surgical Indication: Scheduled for elective total hysterectomy for gynecological conditions
- Deemed suitable candidates for the vNOTES (Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery) approach by a senior gynecologic surgeon.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I or III.
- Uterine volume ≤14 weeks of gestation (or a sonographically estimated weight of ≤ 500 grams) to ensure a standardized vNOTES procedural duration
- Ability to understand the study protocol and provide written informed consent, including the willingness to use the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain assessment.
- Sufficient literacy and fluency in Turkish to accurately complete postoperative pain and recovery surveys
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Chronic Pain Syndromes: Diagnosis of chronic pelvic pain, fibromyalgia, or any condition requiring long-term analgesic or opioid therapy, as these may distort postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores.
- Extensive Adhesions: Known or suspected severe pelvic adhesions (Stage III or IV endometriosis) or a history of multiple major abdominal surgeries that might necessitate conversion to traditional laparoscopy or laparotomy.
- Uterine Size: Uterine weight exceeding 500 grams or size greater than 14 weeks of gestation, potentially requiring morcellation or prolonged surgical time.
- Anatomical Constraints: Severe vaginal stenosis or insufficient vaginal access that precludes the vNOTES approach.
- Hypersensitivity: Known allergy or hypersensitivity to local anesthetics or medications used in the standardized postoperative pain protocol.
- Psychiatric/Cognitive Disorders: Any condition that impairs the patient's ability to reliably report pain levels using the VAS or follow the study protocol.
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:支持治疗
- 分配:随机化
- 介入模型:并行分配
- 屏蔽:三倍
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
无干预:Control Group
A standardized low-pressure pneumoperitoneum of 8 mmHg was utilized for all vNOTES hysterectomies and salpingectomies. Oophorectomy or additional surgical interventions were integrated into the procedure as required by the clinical findings |
|
|
实验性的:Study Group
Similar to the control group, vNOTES hysterectomy in the intervention group was performed under an 8 mmHg low-pressure pneumoperitoneum. However, this group received an additional intraperitoneal washout with warm saline (25mL/kg) at the end of the surgery. |
To maintain peritoneal homeostasis and prevent thermal-induced desiccation, the irrigation fluid was standardized to normothermic saline (37°C). A volume of $25 mL/kg was administered at the conclusion of the procedure, ensuring all subdiaphragmatic CO2 pockets were effectively displaced while preserving the peritoneal fibrinolytic environment. |
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
24 h postoperative VAS score
大体时间:24 hours
|
Postoperative pain was evaluated through a visual analog scale (VAS). Patients subjectively rated their pain on a 0-10 scale, where 0 represented no pain and 10 signified the worst possible pain. Pain assessment was conducted 24 hours after surgery, with evaluations performed by clinicians experienced in using the scale. |
24 hours
|
合作者和调查者
出版物和有用的链接
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.