A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Golimumab (CNTO 148) in Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Previously Treated With Biologic Anti-TNFa Agent(s)

January 27, 2014 updated by: Centocor, Inc.

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of Golimumab, a Fully Human Anti-TNFa Monoclonal Antibody, Administered Subcutaneously in Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and Previously Treated With Biologic Anti- TNFa Agent(s)

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of golimumab (CNTO 148) in subjects who have active rheumatoid arthritis and have been treated previously with at least 1 dose of a biologic anti-TNFa agent (etanercept, adalimumab or infliximab).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Golimumab is a fully human protein (antibody) which binds to tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFa). TNFa is increased in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and plays a major role in causing the joint pain, swelling and damage from RA. Other marketed drugs that target TNFa (anti-TNFa drugs) have been shown to be effective in reducing the symptoms, signs and joint damage of RA, but have limitations with respect to safety and ease of use. This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of a new anti-TNFa drug, golimumab, at 2 doses, injected under the skin every 4 weeks in subjects with active RA previously treated with at least 1 dose of a biologic anti-TNFa agent (etanercept, adalimumab or infliximab). Concomitant therapy with methotrexate, sulfasalazine and/or hydroxychloroquine is permitted if the subject has tolerated these medications for at least 12 weeks prior to the first administration of study drug and is on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to the first administration of study agent. The study hypothesis is that golimumab will be a safe and effective treatment for RA in subjects with active RA previously treated with at least one biologic anti-TNFa agent as measured by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria, the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) responses and the change from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), without causing unacceptable significant adverse effects. The ACR response criteria were designed to assess the level of improvement in the signs and symptoms of RA. The DAS28 responses also measure improvement in the signs and symptoms of RA using the joint examination and laboratory testing. The HAQ is a series of questions that measure a subject's impairment in physical function caused by RA. Patients will receive golimumab 50 mg or 100 mg or placebo injections under the skin every 4 weeks until Week 24. After Week 24, all subjects receive golimumab 50 mg or 100 mg injections, and golimumab continues for all groups every 4 weeks for about 4 and a half more years.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
461

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Australia
      • Adelaide, Australia
      • Cotton Tree, Australia
      • Melbourne, Australia
  • Austria
      • Graz, Austria
      • Lainz/Wien N/A, Austria
      • Wien, Austria
  • Canada
      • Claire, Canada
    • British Columbia
      • Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
    • Manitoba
      • Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
    • Newfoundland and Labrador
      • St. John'S, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
    • Ontario
      • Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
      • Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    • Quebec
      • Sainte Foy, Quebec, Canada
  • Finland
      • Helsinki, Finland
      • Hyvinkaa, Finland
      • Jyvalskyla, Finland
  • Germany
      • Baden-Baden, Germany
      • Berlin, Germany
      • Erlangen, Germany
      • Hamburg, Germany
      • Herne, Germany
      • Köln, Germany
      • München, Germany
      • Vogelsang-Gommern, Germany
      • Würzburg, Germany
  • Netherlands
      • Maastricht, Netherlands
  • New Zealand
      • Auckland, New Zealand
      • Rotorua, New Zealand
      • Timaru, New Zealand
  • Spain
      • Santander, Spain
      • Sevilla, Spain
      • Valencia, Spain
  • United Kingdom
      • Leeds, United Kingdom
      • London, United Kingdom
      • Oxford, United Kingdom
  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States
      • Huntsville, Alabama, United States
    • Arizona
      • Paradise Valley, Arizona, United States
    • California
      • La Jolla, California, United States
      • Los Angeles, California, United States
      • Santa Monica, California, United States
      • Torrance, California, United States
      • Upland, California, United States
    • Connecticut
      • Trumbull, Connecticut, United States
    • Florida
      • Aventura, Florida, United States
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States
      • Jupiter, Florida, United States
      • Largo, Florida, United States
      • Palm Harbor, Florida, United States
      • Tamarac, Florida, United States
    • Illinois
      • Moline, Illinois, United States
      • Springfield, Illinois, United States
    • Iowa
      • Cedar Rapids, Iowa, United States
    • Kansas
      • Witchita, Kansas, United States
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States
    • Maryland
      • Wheaton, Maryland, United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
    • New York
      • Syracuse, New York, United States
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
      • Wilmington, North Carolina, United States
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
      • Mayfield, Ohio, United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
      • West Reading, Pennsylvania, United States
    • Tennessee
      • Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
    • Texas
      • Fort Worth, Texas, United States
      • Houston, Texas, United States
      • Lubbock, Texas, United States
    • Virginia
      • Arlington, Virginia, United States
    • Washington
      • Spokane, Washington, United States
    • Wisconsin
      • Brookfield, Wisconsin, United States
      • Racine, Wisconsin, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients have a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (according to the revised 1987 criteria of the ACR) for at least 3 months prior to screening
  • Have active RA as defined by persistent disease activity with at least 4 swollen and 4 tender joints, at the time of screening and baseline
  • Must have been previously treated with at least one dose of etanercept, adalimumab, or infliximab
  • If currently using methotrexate, sulfasalazine and/or hydroxychloroquine must have tolerated these agents for at least 12 weeks and be on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to the first administration of study agent
  • If using NSAIDs or other analgesics must be on a stable dose for at least 2 weeks prior to the first administration of study agent
  • If using oral corticosteroids must be on a stable dose equivalent to <= 10 mg of prednisone/day for at least 2 weeks prior to first administration of study agent
  • Are considered eligible according to specified tuberculosis (TB) screening criteria.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients cannot have other inflammatory diseases other than RA that might interfere with the evaluation of the benefit of golimumab therapy
  • No history of treatment with natalizumab, rituximab or cytotoxic agents
  • No history of demyelinating diseases such as multiple sclerosis or optic neuritis or of concurrent congestive heart failure (CHF), lymphoproliferative disease, known malignancy or history of malignancy within the previous 5 years (with the exception of a nonmelanoma skin cancer that has been treated with no evidence of recurrence)
  • No history of, or ongoing, chronic or recurrent infectious disease
  • No serious infection within 2 months prior to first administration of study agent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Group 1: Placebo
Placebo Subcutaneous (SC) injections every 4 weeks (wks) thru Wk 20 (unless early escape at Wk 16); Golimumab - if early escape, 50 mg SC injections from Wk 16 up to 5 yrs; Golimumab - 50 mg SC injections beginning Wk 24 up to 5 yrs (unless early escape); Golimumab - Dr's discretion after unblinding, dose adjusted from 50 to 100 mg and from 100 to 50mg. Duration of the blinded period will be until the week-24 database lock.
Drug: Placebo
SC injections
Biological: Golimumab 50 mg
SC injections
EXPERIMENTAL: Group 2: Golimumab 50 mg
Golimumab 50 mg SC injections every 4 wks from Wk 0 up to 5 yrs (unless early escape at Wk 16); Golimumab - if early escape, 100 mg SC injections every 4 wks beginning Wk 16 up to 5 yrs; Golimumab - Dr's discretion after unblinding, dose adjusted from 50 to 100 mg and from 100 to 50mg. Duration of the blinded period will be until the week-24 database lock.
Biological: Golimumab 50 mg
SC injections
EXPERIMENTAL: Group 3: Golimumab 100 mg
Golimumab 100 mg SC injections every 4 wks from Wk 0 up to 5 yrs; Golimumab - Dr's discretion after unblinding, dose adjusted from 100 to 50 mg. Duration of the blinded period will be until the week-24 database lock.
Biological: Golimumab 100 mg
SC injections

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 14.
Time Frame: Week 14
ACR 20 response is an improvement of >= 20% from baseline in both the tender and swollen joint count and in at least 3 of the 5 assessments ( patient's assessment of pain visual analog scale (VAS), patient's global assessment of disease activity VAS scale, Physician's global assessment of disease activity VAS scale, Health Assessment Questionnaire and C-reactive protein)
Week 14

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response at Week 14
Time Frame: Week 14
Number of patients who achieved an ACR 50 response at Week (Wk) 14. ACR 50 response is an improvement of >= 50% from baseline in both the tender and swollen joint count and in at least 3 of the 5 assessments ( patient's assessment of pain visual analog scale (VAS), patient's global assessemnt of disease activity VAS scale, Physician's global assessment of disease activity VAS scale, Health Assessment Questionnaire and C-reactive protein).
Week 14
Disease Activity Index Score 28 (DAS 28) (Using C-reactive Protein) Response at Week 14
Time Frame: Week 14
DAS 28 using C-reactive protein (CRP) is an index to measure disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis which combines tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), CRP value, and participant's global assessment of disease activity (using a Visual Analog Scale of 0 to 100 mm). The DAS 28 score ranges from 0 (best) to 10 (worst).
Week 14
American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 at Week 24
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 24
Number of patients who achieved ACR 20 response at Week (Wk) 24. ACR 20 response is an improvement of >= 20% from baseline in both the tender and swollen joint count and in at least 3 of the 5 assessments ( patient's assessment of pain visual analog scale (VAS), patient's global assessemnt of disease activity VAS scale, Physician's global assessment of disease activity VAS scale,HAQ and CRP)
From Baseline to Week 24
Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score at Week 24
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 24
Improvement from baseline in HAQ score at Week 24. This 20-question instrument assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area based on the worst score from the questions that pertain to that task. The HAQ score is determined by the average of the 8 scores; HAQ ranges from 0 to 3.
From Baseline to Week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centocor, Inc.

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Schering-Plough

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2006

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2007

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 3, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 3, 2006

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 7, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 27, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 27, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CR006334
  • C0524T11 (OTHER: Centocor)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings