A Study Comparing the Effectiveness and Safety of Extended Release Tramadol Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Knee

June 20, 2012 updated by: Bausch Health Americas, Inc.

Double-blind, Randomized, Dose-titration, Parallel-group Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Extended Release Tramadol Hydrochloride (Tramadol HCl ER) and Placebo in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee.

The purpose of this study is to compare the analgesic effectiveness and safety of tramadol HCl ER to placebo in patients with moderate to severe pain due to osteoarthritis (OA). The study hypothesis is that tramadol HCl ER is effective and safe in the treatment of OA.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Immediate release (IR) tramadol has demonstrated efficacy in several pain conditions including: obstetrical, gynecological, orthopedic, abdominal, and oral surgery. The short elimination half-life of IR tramadol requires every 4-6 hour dosing to maintain optimal levels of analgesia in chronic pain. The study medication in this study is a once-daily, extended-release (ER) tramadol formulation. This is a 12-week, multi-center, double-blind, randomized, dose-titration, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study designed to evaluate the analgesic effectiveness and safety of once daily tramadol HCl ER with placebo in the treatment of patients with OA of the knee. Patients with OA Functional Class I-III of the knee will be eligible for participation, if appropriate criteria are met. After a 2-7 day washout period, during which the use of all analgesic medications used for chronic pain management will be discontinued, patients experiencing moderate to severe pain (pain intensity >= 40 mm on a 100 mm visual analog scale) in the index knee and who meet all other study criteria will enter a 2-week, double-blind, titration period. During this period, patients will be randomly assigned to treatment with tramadol HCl ER or placebo, once daily (QD). The initial dose will be tramadol HCl ER 100 mg or matching placebo QD. On Day 4 and for the remainder of the week, patients will be titrated to 200 mg or matching placebo QD, based on tolerability. Beginning at Visit 3, a minimum dose of 200 mg or matching placebo QD are to be maintained for the remainder of the 12-week study. Patients unable to tolerate at least 200 mg or matching placebo QD will be discontinued from the study. After Week 1 (Visit 3), further increases to 300 mg or 400 mg or matching placebo QD were permitted, depending on the adequacy of pain relief and tolerability of side effects. Efficacy and safety evaluations will be collected at study visits occurring at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 or at early termination. Study medication will be discontinued at Week 12 and patients will return after 1 week for a post-treatment visit (Week 13).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
245

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Functional Class I-III OA of the knee; involvement of at least one knee joint that warrants treatment with NSAIDs, acetaminophen, or opioid analgesics for at least 75 of the 90 days preceding the screening visit; patients with radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis within the last 6 months; patients with a pain intensity in index joint > = 40 mm on the visual analog scale (VAS) at the baseline visit; patients who are able to discontinue NSAIDs, COX-2 selective inhibitors, and other analgesics during the washout period and throughout double-blind study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a medical condition, other than OA, uncontrolled with treatment or any clinically significant condition that, in the investigator's opinion, precludes study participation or interferes with the assessment of chronic pain and other OA symptoms; patients with a diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis, gout, pseudo-gout or Paget's disease, that, in the investigator's opinion, interferes with the assessment of pain and other symptoms of OA; patients with a diagnosis of chronic pain syndrome, patients with an ACR or a clinical diagnosis of fibromyalgia; patients with a clinically significant form of joint disease or prior joint replacement surgery at the index joint; patients with an anticipated need for surgery or other invasive procedure in the index joint.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
The primary efficacy outcome is the change in arthritis pain intensity score
averages over the 12 weeks of the study.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
The secondary outcomes include change from baseline in the daily arthritis
pain intensity VAS score from patient diaries; WOMAC OA Index pain subscale
scores for pain and physical function, patient's global assessment, patient's
sleep assessment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Bausch Health Americas, Inc.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2000

Study Completion

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2001

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 2, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 2, 2006

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 4, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 21, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 20, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • B00.CT3.015.TRA PO3

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings