Sorafenib to Overcome Resistance to Systemic Chemotherapy in Androgen-independent Prostate Cancer

February 28, 2014 updated by: Dr. Sigrun Hallmeyer, Oncology Specialists, S.C.

Phase I/II Study to Evaluate the Ability of Sorafenib in Overcoming Resistance to Systemic Chemotherapy in Androgen-independent Prostate Cancer (AIPC)

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of combining Sorafenib and chemotherapy (mitoxantrone or docetaxel) in patients with AIPC.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients who have AIPC and are progressing despite systemic chemotherapy will be offered participation in this study. Patients who relapse or progress shortly (within 12 weeks) after discontinuation of chemotherapy with either docetaxel/prednisone or mitoxantrone/prednisone will also be offered participation in this trial. Enrolled patients will receive sorafenib as per protocol define dose. Sorafenib will be administered in combination with the last chemotherapy utilized. If there is no disease progression after 6 cycles, chemotherapy will be stopped and Sorafenib may continue until disease progression.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
22

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Illinois
      • Niles, Illinois, United States, 60714
        • Onocology Specialists, S.C
      • Park Ridge, Illinois, United States, 60068
        • Oncology Specialists, S.C

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years old
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status 0, 1, or 2.
  • Patients with a known diagnosis of prostate cancer regardless of their Gleason grade.
  • Patients have AIPC.
  • Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function as assessed by:
  • Hemoglobin > 9.0 g/dl
  • absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 1,000/mm3
  • Platelet count > 75,000/mm3
  • Total bilirubin < 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • Alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) < 2.5 x the ULN (< 5 x ULN for patients with liver involvement). international normalized ratio (INR) < 1.5 or a Prothrombin time (PT)/partial thromboplastin time (PTT) within normal limits. Patients receiving anti-coagulation treatment with an agent such as warfarin or heparin may be allowed to participate.
  • Creatinine < 1.5 x ULN
  • Transfusions and the use of growth factors (for red and white cells) are allowed
  • Patients must have received either docetaxel or mitoxantrone as the chemotherapy regimen
  • Ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent. A signed informed consent must be obtained prior to any study specific procedures.

  • Patients must have progressed while receiving systemic chemotherapy for AIPC. Patients could have progressed within 12 weeks of their last systemic chemotherapy administration. The definition of progression is defined as follows:

    • 1-For patients who are receiving systemic chemotherapy (one criteria is sufficient):
    • Increase in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) by 25% or more than the previous value. This should be repeated within 3 weeks (while patient is off chemotherapy) to confirm that the PSA did not decrease.
    • For patients with visceral disease, radiographic evidence of progression by standard Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria (regardless of the PSA value).
    • For patients with bone only disease, progression on a whole body bone scan (2 or more new lesions) is sufficient to fulfill the definition of progressive disease, regardless of PSA value or the visceral disease status.
    • 2-For patients who have received chemotherapy previously (Both criteria are needed):
    • Not more than 12 weeks have elapsed since last chemotherapy administration
    • Either biochemical progression (25% increase in PSA that is confirmed with a repeat analysis within 3 weeks), OR radiographic progression (RECIST criteria for visceral disease patients OR 2 or more lesions on a whole body bone scan)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cardiac disease: Congestive heart failure > class II New York Heart Association 9NYHA). Patients must not have unstable angina or new onset angina or myocardial infarction within the past 6 months.
  • Known brain metastasis. Patients with neurological symptoms must undergo a CT scan or MRI of brain to exclude brain metastasis.
  • Cardiac ventricular arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy. Patients with history of chronic and well controlled atrial fibrillation are allowed. Beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, or digoxin are not considered anti-arrhythmics.
  • Uncontrolled hypertension defined as systolic blood pressure > 150 mmHg or diastolic pressure > 90 mmHg, despite optimal medical management.
  • Sorafenib is contraindicated in patients with known severe hypersensitivity to sorafenib or any of the excipients.
  • Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or chronic Hepatitis B or C.
  • Active clinically serious infection > Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects (CTCAE) Grade 2.
  • Thrombolic or embolic events such as a cerebrovascular accident including transient ischemic attacks within the past 6 months.
  • Pulmonary hemorrhage/bleeding event > CTCAE Grade 2 within 4 weeks of first dose of study drug.
  • Any other hemorrhage/bleeding event > CTCAE Grade 3 within 4 weeks of first dose of study drug.
  • Serious non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture.
  • Evidence or history of bleeding diathesis or uncontrolled coagulopathy.
  • Major surgery, open biopsy or significant traumatic injury within 4 weeks of first study drug.
  • Use of St. John's Wort or rifampin (rifampicin).
  • Known or suspected allergy to sorafenib or any agent given in the course of this trial.
  • Any condition that impairs patient's ability to swallow whole pills.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Single agent Sorafenib
Oral Single agent Sorafenib 400mg twice daily
Drug: Sorafenib
400mg twice daily
Other Names:
  • Nexavar

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Patients Needing a Dose Reduction.
Time Frame: participants were followed for an average of 25 months
The actual percentage was determined by taking the number of patients requiring a dose reduction divided by the total number of patients multiplied by100%
participants were followed for an average of 25 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Clinical Benefit (OCB)of This Combination as Calculated by the Sum of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), and Stable Disease (SD).
Time Frame: 3-10 months
Assessment of response was done per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria as outlined in the protocol. Complete Response (CR) defined as disappearance of all measurable lesions. Partial Response (PR) more than 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter of measurable lesions compared to baseline. Stable Disease (SD) lesions should have no sufficient decrease for PR any sufficient increase to meet criteria for PD. Progressive Disease (PD) more than 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter of measurable lesions compared to baseline, and/or evidence of new lesions on imaging studies or the appearance of 2 or more new bony lesions. For patient with measurable disease,prostate-specific antigen (PSA), progression in the absence of measurable disease progression will not be considered progressive disease. Overall Clinical Benefit (OCB) (CR + PR+ SD)/#participants.
3-10 months
PSA -Biochemical Response
Time Frame: 1-10 months
PSA Biochemical Response = PSA complete response + PSA partial response. A PSA complete response is defined as a non-detectable PSA (<4 ng/dl). A PSA partial response is defined as a PSA that decreases by greater than or equal to 50%.
1-10 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Oncology Specialists, S.C.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 19, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 19, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 21, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 7, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 28, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 0603

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings