Evaluation of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Imaging for the Early Estimate of Bevacizumab Effect on Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases

January 2, 2017 updated by: University Hospital, Tours

Medical and Economical Evaluation of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Imaging for the Early Estimate of Bevacizumab Effect on Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases

Bevacizumab, an anti-angiogenic agent, plus fluorouracil based chemotherapy is considered a new standard for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound with gas-encapsulated microbubbles can be used to assess tumour vascularity, particularly hepatic metastases, and may become a useful tool for monitoring anti-angiogenic therapies. The aim of this prospective, multicenter, non-randomized study is to evaluate the usefulness of hepatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound to predict response to bevacizumab based chemotherapy in patient with metastatic colorectal cancer. The primary objective of this study is to compare the functional vascular changes related to bevacizumab based chemotherapy and evaluated by hepatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound with classic RECIST criteria. The secondary objectives are to do a characterization of the pharmacokinetic of bevacizumab, to explore the pharmacodynamic effects of bevacizumab on functional vascular changes of hepatic metastases evaluated by hepatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound and to analyze the possible relationships between treatment efficacy or toxicity and constitutional gene polymorphisms linked to the bevacizumab.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Angers, France, 49033
        • CHRU d'Angers
      • Angers, France, 49033
        • CRLCC, Centre Paul Papin
      • Besançon, France, 25000
        • CHRU Besançon
      • Bordeaux, France, 33075
        • Hôpital Saint-André, CHRU Bordeaux
      • Nantes St Herblain, France, 44805
        • CRLCC, Centre René Gauducheau
      • Paris, France, 75651
        • Hôpital Pitié Salpétrière, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris
      • Pessac, France, 33604
        • Hôpital Haut-Lévêque
      • Poitiers, France, 86000
        • Hôpital La Milétrie, CHRU Poitiers
      • Reims, France, 51092
        • Hôpital Robert Debré, CHRU Reims
      • Rennes, France, 35033
        • CHU Pontchaillou
      • Rennes, France, 35042
        • CRLCC, Centre Eugène Marquis
      • Tours, France, 37044
        • Chru Tours

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically confirmed colorectal tumor
  • first line treatment by a bevacizumab based chemotherapy
  • Target hepatic metastases of size lower than 5 cm and higher than 5 mm detected by conventional ultrasonography and CT or MRI
  • Life expectancy > 2 months
  • OMS status =< 2
  • Major surgery, open biopsy, or significant traumatic injury within 28 days prior to Day 0
  • informed consent signed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no target hepatic lesion detected by conventional ultrasonography
  • Prior bevacizumab treatment
  • Prior chemotherapy treatment for advanced disease
  • Clinically significant cardiac disease (e.g. myocardial infarction or stroke within 12 months, unstable angina, New York Heart Association (NYHA) Grade II or greater congestive heart failure not well controlled with medication, endocarditis and prosthetic valve) and any contraindications in sulphur hexafluoride administration
  • Blood pressure >= 180/110 mmHg
  • Daily and chronic treatment by aspirin or AINS
  • Anticipation of need for major surgical procedure within 7 days prior day 0
  • Urine protein > 1g/24 Hours
  • Any contraindication in enhancing bevacizumab treatment
  • Serious, uncontrolled, concurrent infection(s) or illness(es)
  • pregnant and lactating woman

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: 1 (single arm)
patient with histologically confirmed colorectal tumor treated in first line by a bevacizumab based chemotherapy
Device: real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging (CEUS)
Real time contrast enhanced sonography was performed using an ultrasound dedicated system after bolus injection of 1.2 and 2x2.4 ml Sonovue ® (Bracco, Milan, Italy)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
functional vascular changes in tumour vascularity of hepatic metastases
Time Frame: 2 months
2 months
Pharmacokinetic of bevacizumab between each cure of bevacizumab based chemotherapy
Time Frame: 2 months
2 months
ratio cost/benefit of a strategy of therapeutic monitoring by contrast-enhanced ultrasound
Time Frame: 2 months
2 months
evaluation of the response to bevacizumab based chemotherapy by RECIST criteria
Time Frame: 2 months
2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
response duration
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
bevacizumab-related toxicity
Time Frame: 2 months
2 months
time to disease progression
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
survival time
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Tours

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: François TRANQUART, Professor, Centre Hospitalier de Tours, France
  • Principal Investigator: Thierry LECOMTE, Doctor, Centre Hospitalier de Tours, France
  • Study Chair: Bruno GIRAUDEAU, Doctor, INSERM CIC 2002, Centre Hospitalier de Tours, France
  • Study Chair: Emmanuel RUSCH, Professor, Centre Hospitalier de Tours, France

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 20, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 20, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 21, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 4, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 2, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • INCA06-FT/STIC-AVASTIN

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings