Prevention of Osteoporosis in Breast Cancer Survivors

November 26, 2023 updated by: University of Nebraska
The purpose of this study is to test whether strength/weight training exercises enhance the effectiveness of calcium, vitamin D, and risedronate for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Each year, more than 192,200 women are diagnosed with breast cancer (Greenlee, Hill-Harmon, Murray, & Thun, 2001). With an increase in early detection and improved therapies, more of these women have become survivors (Vassilopoulou-Sellin & Theriault, 1994). However, many of these women are at increased risk for osteoporosis and the debilitating consequences. This increased risk occurs for two reasons. Over 50-70% of women under the age of 50 (premenopausal) who are treated with adjuvant chemotherapy experience ovarian failure and early menopause (Ali & Twibel, 1994; Cobleigh et al., 1994; Samaan et al., 1978), resulting in a long postmenopausal period of estrogen deprivation. Breast cancer survivors also are at greater risk for osteoporosis because they usually are not candidates for hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Estrogen can influence the growth of cancer in women, especially those with estrogen receptor positive tumors (ER+), and at least 60% of women have ER+ breast cancer (DeVita, Hellman & Rosenberg, 1997). While the use of HRT significantly reduces osteoporosis and the risk of forearm, vertebral, pelvic, and hip fractures in postmenopausal women (Cobleigh et al., 1994; Finkelstein, 1996), women with a history of breast cancer generally are not considered candidates for HRT. Without estrogen, women may lose up to 30% of their bone mass within the first 5-years postmenopause, with continued bone loss over time, but at a slower rate. Very little information has been reported on the incidence and treatment of osteoporosis in breast cancer survivors (Headley et al., 1998; Hosking et al., 1998).

Osteoporosis is a major risk factor for chronic disability and especially hip fractures. The majority of individuals with hip fractures never return to prefracture functional status and estimates of health care costs for individuals with osteoporosis exceed the costs for those with congestive heart failure or with asthma (U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment, 1994; Ray, Chan, Thamer & Meltin, 1997). Prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, by increasing bone mineral density (BMD) and muscle strength, may decrease the chronic disabilities associated with osteoporosis and improve quality and quantity of life (Mahon, 1998). Research on effective alternatives to HRT for the prevention of osteoporosis in breast cancer survivors has been targeted as a priority area by the Office of Cancer Survivorship (Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences) at the National Cancer Institute (Office of Cancer Survivorship, 1999). No reports were found in which the effectiveness of the combination of risedronate, calcium, and vitamin D (administered together and at the current recommended levels for postmenopausal women) was studied, nor has the effectiveness of the addition of long term progressive strength/weight training exercises been evaluated in this at risk population of breast cancer survivors.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
249

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Nebraska
      • Kearney, Nebraska, United States, 68849-4510
        • University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Nursing
      • Lincoln, Nebraska, United States, 68588-0220
        • University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Nursing
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68198-5330
        • University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Nursing
      • Scottsbluff, Nebraska, United States, 69361-4939
        • University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Nursing

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • read, speak and understand English;
  • be female;
  • be between the ages of 35 and 75;
  • have completed treatment (except tamoxifen) for stage 0, I or II breast cancer (i.e. surgery, chemotherapy, radiation) at least 6 months prior to admission to the study;
  • be 1 year postmenopausal (12-months amenorrheic; subjects 55-years or younger with history of hysterectomy without oophorectomy must have it confirmed by two baseline measures of FSH >40 IU/ml);
  • have a BMD T-score of -1.0 SD or lower at one or more sites (spine, hip or forearm); and
  • have agreement of their primary care provider for participation in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • have a recurrence of their breast cancer;
  • currently take hormone replacement therapy, bisphosphonates, calcitonin, raloxifene, calcitriol, or glucocorticosteroids.;
  • currently do strength/weight training exercises or high impact exercises (such as running, jumping rope, high impact aerobic dance, martial arts, volleyball, or basketball) two to three times weekly;
  • have a body mass index (BMI) equal to or greater than 35;
  • have serum calcium, creatinine or TSH (if on thyroid therapy) outside the normal limits;
  • have active gastrointestinal problems such as dysphagia, esophageal disease, gastritis, duodenitis, or ulcers;
  • have Paget=s disease;
  • have renal disease (renal stones or serum creatinine levels greater than the upper normal limits);
  • have a recent history of a spinal fracture (within the past 6 months);
  • have features of an acute fracture on baseline spinal x-rays;
  • have other concomitant conditions that prohibit strength/weight training exercises, calcium, or vitamin D intake.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Strength/Weight Training
Subjects in the G1 group receive drug/supplement combination and strength/weight training exercises for upper and lower extremities and the spine.
Other: Strength/Weight Training & Drug/Supplement
G1 group receives 1200 mg of calcium and 400 IU of vitamin D supplements per day, 35 mg of risedronate per week and strength/weight training exercises for upper and lower extremities and the spine.
Other Names:
  • Actonel
Experimental: Drug Supplement only
Subjects in the G2 group receive drug/supplement combination, but do not participate in strength/weight training exercises.
Combination product: Drug/Supplement only
G2 group receives 1200 mg of calcium and 400 IU of vitamin D supplements per day, 35 mg of risedronate per week, but do not participate in strength/weight training exercises.
Other Names:
  • Actonel

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bone Mineral Density
Time Frame: at 12, 24, and 36 months
Bone Mineral Density (gm/cm2) will be measured by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) of the hip, spine and forearm
at 12, 24, and 36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Muscle Strength
Time Frame: at baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months
Muscle Strength (peak torque/body weight at 60 degrees) will be assessed using BiodexTM Velocity Spectrum Evaluation (Medical Systems, Inc., 1993)
at baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Nebraska

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Nancy L Waltman, PhD, ARNP, University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Nursing

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2002

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 3, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 3, 2007

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 5, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 26, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 0536-01-FB
  • 1R01NR007743-04 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

Clinical Trials on Strength/Weight Training & Drug/Supplement

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings