Prevention of Osteoporosis in Breast Cancer Survivors

November 26, 2023 updated by: University of Nebraska
The purpose of this study is to test whether strength/weight training exercises enhance the effectiveness of calcium, vitamin D, and risedronate for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Each year, more than 192,200 women are diagnosed with breast cancer (Greenlee, Hill-Harmon, Murray, & Thun, 2001). With an increase in early detection and improved therapies, more of these women have become survivors (Vassilopoulou-Sellin & Theriault, 1994). However, many of these women are at increased risk for osteoporosis and the debilitating consequences. This increased risk occurs for two reasons. Over 50-70% of women under the age of 50 (premenopausal) who are treated with adjuvant chemotherapy experience ovarian failure and early menopause (Ali & Twibel, 1994; Cobleigh et al., 1994; Samaan et al., 1978), resulting in a long postmenopausal period of estrogen deprivation. Breast cancer survivors also are at greater risk for osteoporosis because they usually are not candidates for hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Estrogen can influence the growth of cancer in women, especially those with estrogen receptor positive tumors (ER+), and at least 60% of women have ER+ breast cancer (DeVita, Hellman & Rosenberg, 1997). While the use of HRT significantly reduces osteoporosis and the risk of forearm, vertebral, pelvic, and hip fractures in postmenopausal women (Cobleigh et al., 1994; Finkelstein, 1996), women with a history of breast cancer generally are not considered candidates for HRT. Without estrogen, women may lose up to 30% of their bone mass within the first 5-years postmenopause, with continued bone loss over time, but at a slower rate. Very little information has been reported on the incidence and treatment of osteoporosis in breast cancer survivors (Headley et al., 1998; Hosking et al., 1998).

Osteoporosis is a major risk factor for chronic disability and especially hip fractures. The majority of individuals with hip fractures never return to prefracture functional status and estimates of health care costs for individuals with osteoporosis exceed the costs for those with congestive heart failure or with asthma (U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment, 1994; Ray, Chan, Thamer & Meltin, 1997). Prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, by increasing bone mineral density (BMD) and muscle strength, may decrease the chronic disabilities associated with osteoporosis and improve quality and quantity of life (Mahon, 1998). Research on effective alternatives to HRT for the prevention of osteoporosis in breast cancer survivors has been targeted as a priority area by the Office of Cancer Survivorship (Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences) at the National Cancer Institute (Office of Cancer Survivorship, 1999). No reports were found in which the effectiveness of the combination of risedronate, calcium, and vitamin D (administered together and at the current recommended levels for postmenopausal women) was studied, nor has the effectiveness of the addition of long term progressive strength/weight training exercises been evaluated in this at risk population of breast cancer survivors.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

249

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Nebraska
      • Kearney, Nebraska, United States, 68849-4510
        • University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Nursing
      • Lincoln, Nebraska, United States, 68588-0220
        • University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Nursing
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68198-5330
        • University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Nursing
      • Scottsbluff, Nebraska, United States, 69361-4939
        • University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Nursing

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • read, speak and understand English;
  • be female;
  • be between the ages of 35 and 75;
  • have completed treatment (except tamoxifen) for stage 0, I or II breast cancer (i.e. surgery, chemotherapy, radiation) at least 6 months prior to admission to the study;
  • be 1 year postmenopausal (12-months amenorrheic; subjects 55-years or younger with history of hysterectomy without oophorectomy must have it confirmed by two baseline measures of FSH >40 IU/ml);
  • have a BMD T-score of -1.0 SD or lower at one or more sites (spine, hip or forearm); and
  • have agreement of their primary care provider for participation in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • have a recurrence of their breast cancer;
  • currently take hormone replacement therapy, bisphosphonates, calcitonin, raloxifene, calcitriol, or glucocorticosteroids.;
  • currently do strength/weight training exercises or high impact exercises (such as running, jumping rope, high impact aerobic dance, martial arts, volleyball, or basketball) two to three times weekly;
  • have a body mass index (BMI) equal to or greater than 35;
  • have serum calcium, creatinine or TSH (if on thyroid therapy) outside the normal limits;
  • have active gastrointestinal problems such as dysphagia, esophageal disease, gastritis, duodenitis, or ulcers;
  • have Paget=s disease;
  • have renal disease (renal stones or serum creatinine levels greater than the upper normal limits);
  • have a recent history of a spinal fracture (within the past 6 months);
  • have features of an acute fracture on baseline spinal x-rays;
  • have other concomitant conditions that prohibit strength/weight training exercises, calcium, or vitamin D intake.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Strength/Weight Training
Subjects in the G1 group receive drug/supplement combination and strength/weight training exercises for upper and lower extremities and the spine.
G1 group receives 1200 mg of calcium and 400 IU of vitamin D supplements per day, 35 mg of risedronate per week and strength/weight training exercises for upper and lower extremities and the spine.
Other Names:
  • Actonel
Experimental: Drug Supplement only
Subjects in the G2 group receive drug/supplement combination, but do not participate in strength/weight training exercises.
G2 group receives 1200 mg of calcium and 400 IU of vitamin D supplements per day, 35 mg of risedronate per week, but do not participate in strength/weight training exercises.
Other Names:
  • Actonel

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bone Mineral Density
Time Frame: at 12, 24, and 36 months
Bone Mineral Density (gm/cm2) will be measured by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) of the hip, spine and forearm
at 12, 24, and 36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Muscle Strength
Time Frame: at baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months
Muscle Strength (peak torque/body weight at 60 degrees) will be assessed using BiodexTM Velocity Spectrum Evaluation (Medical Systems, Inc., 1993)
at baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nancy L Waltman, PhD, ARNP, University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Nursing

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2002

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2007

First Posted (Estimated)

December 5, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

Clinical Trials on Strength/Weight Training & Drug/Supplement

Subscribe